Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Happy to see the battery life improvements. My Air 1 was able to hold up a charge for 3-4 days with light use. The Air 2 has only about 70-80% of that battery life.
 
the lack of ram really hurts


To be fair, the Ars Technica article did address this point, although not as exaggerated as "really hurts".

Some of our more technically inclined readers—theoretically, the target audience for a “Pro” version of the iPad—are also worried about the tablet’s RAM. The 9.7-inch iPad Pro has 2GB of RAM instead of the 4GB of the 12.9-inch version.

RAM doesn't have quite the same effect in an iOS device as it does in laptops and desktops—iOS was originally designed for low RAM devices, and even though current iPhones and iPads have much more RAM than the 128MB in the first iPhone, the OS is still aggressive about ejecting apps from memory. Giving an iPhone or iPad more RAM doesn't necessarily speed up general performance, but it does mean that apps and browser tabs need to be ejected from memory less often. Today this is particularly beneficial in Safari, which needs to reload tabs when they're ejected from RAM—at best this process adds a couple of extra seconds to what ought to be a simple tab switch, and at worst you don't have connectivity and so can't see the tab you're trying to open.

For the iPad Pro, the consequences could be more far-reaching, just because developers are going to be able to do things with 4GB of RAM that just won't fit into 2GB of RAM. And Apple has occasionally stopped supporting certain devices because of RAM limitations rather than raw performance limitations—the original iPad had 256MB of RAM and didn't get either iOS 6 or iOS 7, while the 512MB iPhone 4 with the same A4 chip got both updates. It's going to be fine for now (many actively supported iPads still have 1GB or even 512MB of RAM), but it could one day be a problem nevertheless.

If this A9X had shown up in an iPad Air 3 and the 12.9-inch iPad Pro didn’t exist, it would have blown us away. It still represents a tangible improvement over the A8X in the Air 2. It’s only next to the full-fat, 4GB-of-RAM A9X in the big Pro that this one looks a little disappointing.

I think it's a pretty balanced analysis, and I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I still consider it an iPad Air 3, not an iPad Pro 9.7".
 
look at the benchmarks, the 9.7 could easily be the best, but apple just has to fracture the line up
 
And the benchmarks are insane ! Benchs better than the new MacBook and runs bett than my MacBook Air 2013.

As expected Apple is delivering much better horsepower than intel and given the low power requirements it's quite a technological achievement in terms of power/watt yields
 
  • Like
Reactions: austriak
look at the benchmarks, the 9.7 could easily be the best, but apple just has to fracture the line up
Quite likely, it's not the amount of RAM that's affecting the benchmarks but the memory subsystem speed.

Reasonable assumptions based on benchmarks and known data on A9 and A9X:
6s: A9, 2GB DDR4, single channel, 64-bit mem bus
Air 2: A8X, 2GB DDR3, single channel, 128-bit mem bus
Pro 9.7: A9X, 2GB DDR4, single channel, 128-bit mem bus
Pro 12.9: A9X, 4GB (2x2GB) DDR4, dual channel, 128-bit mem bus

Lack of RAM wouldn't be much of an issue if iOS implemented a storage-backed paging system/virtual RAM like we have on full desktop OSes. Shouldn't be a problem for those with 64-256GB. Might be an issue for those with 16G-32GB, though.
 
Last edited:
the lack of ram really hurts

There is something else going on that we probably won't find until they do a scan of the chipset. It's either a single-vs-dual channel difference, DDR3 vs DDR4 or 64-bit vs 128-bit going on between the two iPP sizes.

For most people it won't mean a damn thing though and the 2GB vs 4GB is causing more heartburn than it should.
 
I was really hoping for 4GB of RAM. Really had my hopes up for 4GB of RAM :(
What would be awesome is an iPad Mini with these specs :D
 
There is something else going on that we probably won't find until they do a scan of the chipset. It's either a single-vs-dual channel difference, DDR3 vs DDR4 or 64-bit vs 128-bit going on between the two iPP sizes.

For most people it won't mean a damn thing though and the 2GB vs 4GB is causing more heartburn than it should.


Problem is I can see Pro Apps from Developers using 4GB RAM on the iPad Pro and somehow those Pro Apps won't run on the other iPad Pro
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery
There is something else going on that we probably won't find until they do a scan of the chipset. It's either a single-vs-dual channel difference, DDR3 vs DDR4 or 64-bit vs 128-bit going on between the two iPP sizes.

For most people it won't mean a damn thing though and the 2GB vs 4GB is causing more heartburn than it should.

Pretty much. The next "gate" that everyone is riled up about and people forget after 3-4 months and move on with their lives.

Ridiculous to be riled up about. If no benchmark program existed such that no one knew the amount of RAM to begin with, and you actually used the device, no one would have ever noticed the difference. They only notice the difference now artificially being told its 2gb and complaining before the device is even in their hands.

Just the next thing to complain about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HiItsMe
Problem is I can see Pro Apps from Developers using 4GB RAM on the iPad Pro and somehow those Pro Apps won't run on the other iPad Pro
Not likely. Most developers will develop for devices with even less than 2 GB of RAM.

I agree with the response, and I think more likely the devs will adjust their apps accordingly now knowing that the 9.7 is 2gb.

They are not going to alienate potential purchasers as the majority of the "pro" user base will be 9.7 IPP (well over 50%); just how it works as the big device is more a niche product still compared to overall sales/sizes.
 
So much shortsightedness, you all sound like people from the 90s saying all youneed is 1 megabyte of memory for the rest of your life
 

The article that the OP linked actually answered that. The author acknowledges that it doesn't matter right now and that performance will be great. The issue is that a 2GB RAM device will need to be upgraded sooner than one using 4GB. Although iOS is designed to run at lower RAM levels -- not all apps that run on iOS do. Less RAM eventually means less value.

My underpowered iPad 3 proved that point to me and Apple emphasized it by replacing that model with an early off cycle upgrade. I think the larger iPad Pro is currently the better value and will have more longevity.
 
Last edited:
So much shortsightedness, you all sound like people from the 90s saying all youneed is 1 megabyte of memory for the rest of your life

Rest of your life? You sund like you just are cheap and dont want to buy a new device every 2-3 years

Apple has NO duty to you to future-proof your device ANY number of years. Don't like their policies? buy another tablet brand; it's your money to spend. But let's see you run say Android 3 years from now on 3 year old hardware- good luck with that if you are even on the newest OS come then.
 
Apple has NO duty to you to future-proof your device ANY number of years. Don't like their policies? buy another tablet brand; it's your money to spend. But let's see you run say Android 3 years from now on 3 year old hardware- good luck with that if you are even on the newest OS come then.
Even new android devices don't run the latest version of android
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.