Damn AT&T really know how to tick their customers off!![]()
You mean the stupid ones that don't know how to read don't you?
Damn AT&T really know how to tick their customers off!![]()
Other carriers have REAL unlimited plans for a reasonable $50 a month, just in case anyone is finally coming to their senses about AT&T.
Voice traffic bandwidth requirements are real, real low. I am a network engineer and when we size the WAN for concurrent calls, we allow for about 12-16kbs per call. This service will have no impact whatsoever on your current ISP connection.
Got sources that prove your claim or are you just paranoid? Why would anyone turn down the power of their WI-FI? Is that even possible? Let me guess, you believe in alien abductions too? Seriously, you have more to worry about just going out for a Sunday drive and stopping off at McDonalds on the way home.
...
Now I'm wondering, does this mean I still get that unlimited usage AND the rebate? If so, then I'm only out of pocket $50 bucks to improve the poor service in my house.
If this works out the way I hope (I'm sure there will be a loop hole preventing it), I'll certainly drop the $50 get get what I already pay AT&T to do in the first place... WORK in a major metropolitan area.
My house in a GSM/3G deadzone (neighborhood is in a topographical depression). Neither T-mobile nor at&t have a usable signal when I'm at home. I'd love something like this, but I'm not paying 20 bucks a month for it...unless it could eliminate the need for my Vonage service. I despise having home phone service when my wife and I each have wireless phones.
I think that all Wireless Carriers have the same problem.....Physics. You can not send a radio signal thru a metal/concrete structure or other barriers (thick walls, tinted windows, etc). This is one way to get around it. The other option is to install cell towers every 500 feet in your neighborhood. Do you really want that....do you really want to pay for that?
This service is FREE if you want your existing minutes. Reread the article.
Well, yes it is.
UNIX was created by AT&T....this is the foundation for MAC OS X.
Apple's core growth is now wireless....a service invented by AT&T many years ago.
The ties are stronger than you think (or want it to be) !
NO!
You DO NOT have to pay an additional $20 a month!
That is ***ONLY*** if you want to get the unlimited calling plan.
You can just buy the unit outright, and use your already established plan minutes just like you do now when you use your cell phone in your home.
The amount of mis-information on this is scaring me.
If you use your 3G cell phone a lot at home, you could actually lower your calling plan and get the $20 unlimited plan and be ahead.
Again, this is only if you want to.
I'm getting this baby!
I need coverage inside my home that I am not getting now.
I don't feel it's AT&T's fault that I live on the skirt of town, with blown in insulation and metal studs in my house.
CAN"T WAIT FOR IT!
Wireless was invented by AT&T? I don't think so. Wireless technology could be taken back to the days of Marconi. IIRC he was Italian.
Got sources that prove your claim or are you just paranoid? Why would anyone turn down the power of their WI-FI? Is that even possible? Let me guess, you believe in alien abductions too? Seriously, you have more to worry about just going out for a Sunday drive and stopping off at McDonalds on the way home.
Probably no different than they do about Skype or Vonage. If the FCC gets its way (with the net neutrality rules it's trying to formalize), then it won't matter what Comcast thinks anyways.I have to wonder how Comcast feels about AT&T freeloading on their network?
EXACTLY!
Finally someone who GETS IT!
It's only $20 if you want/need that option.
I can see people getting the $20 unlimited plan and cancelling their landline. Or if you run a small biz outta your home.
THis is perf!
As much as I HATE government intervention, with the grueling 2 year contracts the carriers have, the consumer really doesn't have a way to fight this effectively. I either continue to put up with crappy service, or I pay them extra to fix it. Any "voting with your wallet" type of thing here would take 2 years to implement and I'd likely find myself in a similar boat with the next carrier. Never mind the fact that I can't use my device with the other carriers because of another monopolistic policy. This whole wireless market is getting more and more wacky in the US and it is not consumer oriented at all at this point.
If the bandwidth requirements are listed at 256kbps, I'm not imagining it's going to put a load on the average consumers broadband connection.1. this hooks up to your wire
2. it eats bandwith
3. I'll bet money there is no COS monitoring, so you would need to buy a router that can restrict that (granted I have them)
I live on a residential street that nobody's going to frequent. Boingo isn't going to earn me any money. Besides, none of AT&T/Sprint/T-Mobile/Verizons MicroCells are "open networks". Nobody can use them until you've authorized their device.instead of paying AT&T why don't we sign up for boingo, and get $ paid to us when someone uses our network. at lease 1 way you are making some cash, instead of further opening the vein and "donating" to AT&T
...this is an option....buy it if you feel there is value in it....no one is forcing you to buy this.
Wireless Service was never intended to replace wireline service....so don't feel that you should have a 'right' for perfect 3G service within your metal and concrete enclosures that you call HOME or WORK. It just so happens that many of us are lucky to be close enough to existing 3G Cell towers that we are able to pick up a strong enough signal inside building where we work and live.
This is an optional service to allow those customers who can not receive 3G signals behind a tinted window, metal framing, or other barrier so that you to get 3G signals almost anywhere.
Jeez....grow up folks.
Since I didn't make any claims, just asked a question, so I don't have anything to "substantiate". Go back to college. If we're fighting credentials, I have two masters degree and a PhD from a top-4 school. As for comparing risks, I can choose whether to go to McDonalds, I can't choose if my neighbor puts a cell station below my aapartment. Let me guess, you're a smoker?
That being said, I do believe that EM radiation can cause cancer and other problems, it's a question of range and of frequencies, and has been proven scientifically in vitro. The question is whether Wi-Fi and 3G and DECT cause cancers in household ranges. That hasn't been proven yet, just like it took a while to demonstrate that cigarettes cause cancer. I do think that there may be cause for concern, so when possible I like to minimize transmission powers around the house. Again, basic physics.
I live in a 1000sq apartment. When my wi-fi is set to maximum power, I can get my network 5 blocks away. That's a waste. So I went into my router's configuration menu and reduced the transmission power, yours can do it too.
I would also not live somewhere that is right under a huge cell tower.
I encourage you to put an iphone continuously downloading in your pants pocket in a single-bar zone. Natural selection.
David.there is value in it. this is a great idea in a data center network darkspot etc, I think what people/me are irritated about it the recurring monthly charges.
Oh btw, having Wi-Fi also affects you.
But they don't hav ethe iPhone. So for most here that is not an option.
"How little regard for your customers do you have to have to offer a product that fixes your own product for an additional fee every month? "
^ Adam/Gizmodo really hit the nail on the head.
![]()
AT%T must think I'm stupid!
"...if you're too stupid to see the benefits of this technology, than you're an idiot IMO."
But you're too stupid to understand what this argument is about. The problem isn't that the technology doesn't have a benefit. The problem is that the benefit it provides (good cellular service) is something AT&T should already be providing. Seriously, have the people applauding AT&T completely lost the plot?