Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
exactly $30 is more but oh well, its for faster data. The unlimited data never included messages so I don't know where anyone was thinking that idea. The text messages come with the voice plan, which starts at 39.99 and includes 200 messages just like the older plans, the $30 is strictly an increase for unlimited data, big deal.
 
I spoke to an ATT rep yesterday about the 3G iPhone. I'm a college student so when I originally bought the first iPhone, i didn't have a need for the data services when I was in school so I got rid of it, and just added texts to my plan. I have Wi Fi all over campus and in my apartment and ride to campus is 5 minutes so I never had a use for it. So when I called the ATT rep, I told him if that could be applied again to the 3G iPhone (I am unlocking my Iphone and selling it for twice as much as the new 3G iPhone). He told me it was possible to get rid of the data and just add texts. He told me when I go to buy the iPhone at the ATT store, they'll force you to put the data plan, just call ATT customer service and have them talk to the store rep and they'll keep my plan currently under the new iPhone or they could get reported. I don't know if this is true but that's what he told me, and he seemed to know alot about Iphones and the new 3G iPhone. He said store reps could be reported if they force customers to get the data plan if they didn't have it before. again I don't know how much of this is true but ima try it out when the Iphone 3g comes out... Just in case anyone is wondering why I would even get the 3G phone, its cuz i just want the new one out and i like the form factor, similar to my macbook air. and plus if i get to keep my current plan, then I get back 200+ after selling the first one


thank you for this info. hopefully this is true, because that could make a big difference for ppl who dont need data 24/7
 
Except you are dissatisfied because something that Apple did not promise to you was taken away. I understand the frustration, but you never had a promise or expectation that Apple was going to support unlockers forever and ever. They've tried blocking the unlocks and jailbreaks in software updates, and now AT&T stepped in as well. It sucks if you were depending on that, but since Apple has never said they'd operate otherwise I guess you're SOL.

I think you need to realize that there's a huge difference between actively supporting multiple carriers and an underground movement supporting multiple carriers. With the latter, you've got to operate under the assumption that as the business and software changes, you might lose what you've created and be forced to start over. No one promised and took it away, you took it without any guarantees and are now pissed off about it.



Except almost every other mobile phone in the United States is sold in a similar fashion to the iPhone. No one has promised you an iPhone on your terms, only on the terms of the corporation producing it. Whether or not you like it, that has always been what was presented. The corporations have the right to change the rules, and the best weapon you have to fight back is to choose not to work with them. Bitching and moaning about how you can't unlock it doesn't change the fact that Apple never promised you an unlocked iPhone and has no obligation to provide one to you.


i never said they promised it. i never said they werent justified. i just said it sucks. GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS.
 
so can you get that on an unlocked iphone 3g (assuming we can unlock it)???

in theory, assuming that you can somehow buy it without signing an att contract. Which they seem to have completely eliminated by making you purchase the phone with a contract.
 
So for the UK do you reckon its going to be possible to buy a 8gb payg iphonev2 and then be able to unlock it to use any sim card ( aka an o2 contract sim card)???????
 
So for the UK do you reckon its going to be possible to buy a 8gb payg iphonev2 and then be able to unlock it to use any sim card ( aka an o2 contract sim card)???????

Yes it will be as they're not making have a contract so you can get out of PAYG easy.
 
exactly $30 is more but oh well, its for faster data. The unlimited data never included messages so I don't know where anyone was thinking that idea. The text messages come with the voice plan, which starts at 39.99 and includes 200 messages just like the older plans, the $30 is strictly an increase for unlimited data, big deal.

I SEE, sorry i was mistaken
 
Quick question: For the current iPhone, if you unlock it and stick a t-mobile sim card, can you get internet access with it? If the iPhone 3g were to be unlocked, can we get 3G access from t-mobile???

I don't think so. Doesn't t-mobile's 3G use a different chipset?

-Kevin
 
It's HERE at the bottom is prices.



Should not be more than £199 though not bad.

I doubt its gonna be 200 quid for a payg iphone!

Other wise everyone would just get that, take it home and unlock it, then its going to be the whole unlocking process all over again.

I predict the payg iphones to be more around 350 400 mark!
 
are you seriously not getting this? att will take a hit when they sell the iphone 3G for $199 that they expect to make up through the plan. unlocking the iphone 3G and using it on t-mobile is essentially stealing $1680 ($40 x 24 months of voice + $30 x 24 months of data) from att that you would have paid had you honored your contract.

1. There is no confirmation at all, or even indication, that AT&T is paying Apple more than $199 per phone. Meaning, there is no indication whatsoever of a standard subsidy. For all AT&T has indicated and said directly, they will sell us the iPhone for the price Apple has dictated, which is the price Apple charges: $199. Period. AT&T is out nothing.

2. Defaulting on a contract is not equivalent to stealing the dollar value of the contract, for in exchange for the dollar value of the contract one expects to receive like value of goods. A contract has a maximum value of materials exchanged to initiate it. If that is $200 (again, your supposition entirely, not supported by any external facts), then the value of the contract is $200. If that is $0, then the value of the contract is $0.
 
So much for business standards of support

The in-store activation alone is a deal-breaker simply in terms of having to replace a phone under warranty. Do they ship you a DOA replacement already activated? What do they do with corporate customers, make you go to the nearest AT&T or Apple store? This policy is going to last all of about two months. It's idiotic.
 
I doubt its gonna be 200 quid for a payg iphone!

Other wise everyone would just get that, take it home and unlock it, then its going to be the whole unlocking process all over again.

I predict the payg iphones to be more around 350 400 mark!

I dunno really as Steve said no more that 199 around the world but I don't mind £300.
 
The in-store activation alone is a deal-breaker simply in terms of having to replace a phone under warranty. Do they ship you a DOA replacement already activated? What do they do with corporate customers, make you go to the nearest AT&T or Apple store? This policy is going to last all of about two months. It's idiotic.

It seems to me that they're simply going back to the "traditional" method of activating phones that's been in use for years. I suspect what will happen is they sign you up to a contract and scan the IMEI and SIM card numbers from the outside of the box which will tie them up on their system. Then when you get home and plug the phone in, it will activate automatically when the two match what's already on their system. For warranty replacements, they'd either update the new IMEI number to your existing SIM card in store, or else ship one out and you phone a CSR with the details when you get the new phone.
This is how every new phone I've bought over the last 10 years or so before the iPhone was handled and the simple reason for it is to make sure you're tied into a contract before you leave the store. If you then subsequently unlock it, you still have your contract to pay so they don't lose out.
 
1. There is no confirmation at all, or even indication, that AT&T is paying Apple more than $199 per phone. Meaning, there is no indication whatsoever of a standard subsidy. For all AT&T has indicated and said directly, they will sell us the iPhone for the price Apple has dictated, which is the price Apple charges: $199. Period. AT&T is out nothing.

http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=25791

In the near term, AT&T anticipates that the new agreement will likely result in some pressure on margins and earnings, reflecting the costs of subsidized device pricing, which, in turn, is expected to drive increased subscriber volumes.

If they aren't paying apple a subsidy, why are they warning about the subsidy affecting earnings on their Apple 3G iPhone intro page.
 
I agree completely...

The in-store activation alone is a deal-breaker simply in terms of having to replace a phone under warranty. Do they ship you a DOA replacement already activated? What do they do with corporate customers, make you go to the nearest AT&T or Apple store? This policy is going to last all of about two months. It's idiotic.

How long does Apple think it is going to take to get everyone through that iPhone line on July 11th now that they have signed up to do all of ATT's activations for them. It's gonna be a disaster at the stores for sure. All Apple store employees will now be ATT activation reps, nice job Steve!
 
Honestly, has anyone ever priced a smartphone in Asia? You can't buy a reputable 3g flip or slider for under $300 to $400 US. Smartphones run $500 to $1000 US.

It's obvious that you buy an iPhone, sign up with ATT and pay the termination fee if you want to go the unlock route. You'll own a device that will cost you less US dollars then the crappiest BB or Nokia available worldwide.

The new iPhone is a bargain at $500 to $600 US dollars. Shop around the world and you'll see that the device is fairly priced even if you pay ATT to terminate.

And besides, even if the termination fee is $250, the base model iPhone 3g will only cost you $450.

You're buying into a "platform". If you don't see the benefit, buy something else. Apple is going to do just fine without you.
 
1. There is no confirmation at all, or even indication, that AT&T is paying Apple more than $199 per phone. Meaning, there is no indication whatsoever of a standard subsidy. For all AT&T has indicated and said directly, they will sell us the iPhone for the price Apple has dictated, which is the price Apple charges: $199. Period. AT&T is out nothing.

Apart from this you mean?: This clearly states that the phone is subsidized by AT&T:

In the near term, AT&T anticipates that the new agreement will likely result in some pressure on margins and earnings, reflecting the costs of subsidized device pricing, which, in turn, is expected to drive increased subscriber volumes.
 
All of this talk leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I think that Apple dropped the price and let the carriers have it their way in order to quickly increase market share. Apple has the AppStore + iTunes to make additional revenue without having to share with the carriers.
 
The in-store activation alone is a deal-breaker simply in terms of having to replace a phone under warranty. Do they ship you a DOA replacement already activated? What do they do with corporate customers, make you go to the nearest AT&T or Apple store? This policy is going to last all of about two months. It's idiotic.

Not making excuses, but this policy is the same as for other phones you purchase under contract from most carriers here in the US, including AT&T. You have to sign the contract and pick a phone and plan all at the same time. When replacing a broken phone (insurance replacement), I think you call your carrier and they program it over the AIR without going to the store.
 
The only thing I'm going to bitch about...

Is the fact that I have to activate it at the store.

Now, I know I'm jumping to conclusions here since nothing formal has been released as to the process, but I really don't want some ill-informed AT&T neanderthal, who has no clue that Apple makes computers too, opening MY box and touching MY iPhone before me. This is sacrilegious!

The fact that I ordered MY iPhone online, opened it up in MY home, plugged it into MY Mac, launched MY itunes was a great experience.

Most of the time, these workers don't even know anything about the plans or the phones themselves. Case in point: We get new cell phones in Feb 07. Told the AT&T(then Cingular) worker that I wouldn't get an iPhone until they dropped the price. The worker proceeded to tell me that Cingular was going to offer huge discounts on the iPhone when it came out and that I would be able to pick one up for $99 with signing a new 2 year contract. I looked at them like they had lobsters crawling out of their ears. I asked them where they heard that, the response was classic. "Every phone company offers those kind of deals." I chuckled at her and told her that she was in for a rude awakening because Apple wasn't going to have any of that. She didn't believe me. Hmmmmm..... who was correct in this situation?????

The more I think of it the more I am uneasy with the iPhone being this cheap. The iPhone will become the next iPod at the Apple Store... Some snot nosed teenager standing in line because his iPhone won't work and there I am purchasing a new MacBook Pro, while the Apple Store employees treat him better than me.... Go Figure!
 
There are some naive people in the world, and you have just landed yourself in the top 5%.

This is not a restaurant. Anyway if you would like to get your analogy accurate, the food is being pre-cooked & delivered to your restaurant. Previously we could order and have home delivery, now we are being forced to go and not only purchase the food, but sit in and eat it in a place we don't want to.

Regards,

.Joel

So I'm naive, and my analogy isn't accurate? Lets take a look at your post, but still use my analogy:
This is not a restaurant. Anyway if you would like to get your analogy accurate, the food is being pre-cooked & delivered to your restaurant. Previously we could order and have home delivery, now we are being forced to go and not only purchase the food, but sit in and eat it in a place we don't want to.

You're not being forced to go and purchase the food, nor are you "forced to sit in and eat in a place you don't want to". Choose another restaurant. If you want home delivery, why order from a restaurant that doesn't offer home delivery, and why would you still expect it to be delivered? In fact, the restaurant NEVER offered home delivery. They were just being nice by not really trying to stop customers from placing orders that way. Now they are, as it was always explicitly stated that you couldn't get it delivered.

Wow you guys are using some pretty twisted logic.

While I would first state that arguing through analogy is a very weak tactic, the restaurant analogy is quite apt. I don't like Mexican food, so I don't go to Mexican restaurants. If I don't like AT&T that much, I can just go with another another carrier. If its more inconvenient to go with another carrier, too damn bad, and get over it. If the closest restaurant was Mexican and I had to drive another 4 miles to one I liked, too damn bad, I'll just have to deal with it.

You made too much sense.

Except you are dissatisfied because something that Apple did not promise to you was taken away. I understand the frustration, but you never had a promise or expectation that Apple was going to support unlockers forever and ever. They've tried blocking the unlocks and jailbreaks in software updates, and now AT&T stepped in as well. It sucks if you were depending on that, but since Apple has never said they'd operate otherwise I guess you're SOL.

I think you need to realize that there's a huge difference between actively supporting multiple carriers and an underground movement supporting multiple carriers. With the latter, you've got to operate under the assumption that as the business and software changes, you might lose what you've created and be forced to start over. No one promised and took it away, you took it without any guarantees and are now pissed off about it.



Except almost every other mobile phone in the United States is sold in a similar fashion to the iPhone. No one has promised you an iPhone on your terms, only on the terms of the corporation producing it. Whether or not you like it, that has always been what was presented. The corporations have the right to change the rules, and the best weapon you have to fight back is to choose not to work with them. Bitching and moaning about how you can't unlock it doesn't change the fact that Apple never promised you an unlocked iPhone and has no obligation to provide one to you.

You too.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.