Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,033
38,735



In late July, AT&T announced that as of October 1st it would begin throttling data speeds for customers on unlimited data plans who registered in the top 5% of heaviest data users. While AT&T no longer offers unlimited data plans, customers who had signed up for such plans prior to their discontinuation, including many iPhone users, have been grandfathered in and allowed to keep their unlimited plans.

att_throttle_warning.jpg



Reddit user "TheReverendZ" yesterday reported (via 9to5Mac) that he had received a text message from AT&T warning him that he had fallen into that top 5% group and encouraging him to use Wi-Fi to help avoid throttling of his data speeds. TheReverendZ notes that he typically uses 10-12 GB of data per month, as he does not have home Internet service, while "skelatwork" reports that he received a similar notice when he had passed approximately 11 GB of data for the month.

AT&T has noted that it will provide multiple warnings and a grace period before beginning to throttle data speeds, and it now appears that the carrier has begun the warning process. Customers subject to throttling will retain access to unlimited data but will see their speeds reduced until the start of the next billing cycle.

Article Link: AT&T Begins Warning High-Volume Data Users of Upcoming Throttling
 
And now I begin to live in fear of Verizon with my average 9GB of usage per month.

Help me LTE. You're my only hope.
 
Just do it. Those people are impacting network quality.

Seems reasonable to me, as much as I dislike AT&T. Every other ISP has fair use policies to prevent the select few from affecting everyone else.

Agree. You should see how some of these people boasted in the forum.
 
The reverend needs a life...

12GB per month? Streaming porn for sure...
Get off the internet, Reverend and try a social life... :rolleyes:
 
Interesting, being in the top 5% is relative. If the top 5% reduce their internet consumption then the data limit for being in the top 5% reduces. So the more you reduce your consumption the lower the overall limit decreases.

So if everyone is downloading only 1kb per month, and someone downloads 2kb then they would be in the top 5%.

I wonder if they have a 'lower' limit?
 
Throttled access ≠ No access. And as always if you're dissatisfied, switch to Sprint. Voting with your wallet always works.

Forget it. If they advertise it as unlimited then that's what it should be. If they throttle it then it is no longer unlimited.
All ISPs should be prevented from using the term unlimited unless they specify up front clearly what they mean by it.

----------

Interesting, being in the top 5% is relative. If the top 5% reduce their internet consumption then the data limit for being in the top 5% reduces. So the more you reduce your consumption the lower the overall limit decreases.

So if everyone is downloading only 1kb per month, and someone downloads 2kb then they would be in the top 5%.

I wonder if they have a 'lower' limit?

Your siggy is pointed at those from the US no?
 
It is not at all reasonable.

Every ISP has fair use policies to prevent the select few from affecting everyone else.

No. If your contract stipulates unlimited access, then you are entitled to it. Arbitrarily throttling your usage violates that.

Modern networks are not dump trucks—they do not become full and then stop taking more load. You get apportioned bandwidth based on availability. Period.

If he fully utilizes the network during low activity, why throttle him?
 
How is it possible to use 11-12GB/mo on a phone without stealing tethering service? I'm going to have to go with "reasonable" on this policy from AT&T.
 
Throttled access ≠ No access. And as always if you're dissatisfied, switch to Sprint. Voting with your wallet always works.

If they throttle speeds down to, say, 10kbps, then I would say that is tantamount to cutting off access.

If they didn't want people using unlimited data, they should not have advertised it.
 
No. If your contract stipulates unlimited access, then you are entitled to it. Arbitrarily throttling your usage violates that.

Modern networks are not dump trucks—they do not become full and then stop taking more load. You get apportioned bandwidth based on availability. Period.

If he fully utilizes the network during low activity, why throttle him?

look at the small print on the contract every contract in the uk says subject to fair useage policy
 
12 gigs?? holy crap! How do u use that much? i understand u dont have home internet.. but 12 gigs on a mobile phone?? whaat are you doin lol?
 
What the...

I'm torrenting every file ever shared on the internet right now,
all thanks to 3g.
 
oh well, if they do that, i'll certainly have my eyes on Sprint's offering.

i think between 5 and 10 gigs is more reasonable than 2 to 3 gigs per month for the same monthly rate.
 
10 GB of data? Good lord.

Throttling sounds reasonable in this case.

Most people who have unlimited don't really need it anyway. It's one of those psychological things.
 
You pay for unlimited access, but the speed of the connection isn't in the contract as far as I know.

Again, like a few have already mentioned, throttle speed is still unlimited data. You still getting unlimited data, just slower in speed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.