Looks Ok to me. not that much of a difference.
Looks Ok to me. not that much of a difference.
Click the 3G for each one![]()
Min I reminds you that those maps are terribly inaccurate. Both of them. AT&T doesn't cover all that, nor does Verizon.
Those maps include roaming areas that would not be covered and have limitations imposed, of coarse AT&T and Verizon won't say anything about it.
Real coverage maps are seen if you look at the Pre-Paid coverage maps.
Click Data for AT&T and Mobile Broadband for Verizon... stays the same... also big surprise. AT&T has coverage in places Verizon lacks and vice-versa.
Wow, I never realized AT&Ts non-roaming coverage in the west was that bad.
AT&T 3g coverage is about 1/3 of verizons and that map.
Verizon's 3G coverage speed is only a littler faster than AT&T's edge network. AT&T's 3G coverage is way faster than Verizon.
This is a major reason why rural carriers have petitioned the FCC to stop phone exclusivity, or at least let them have access to those phones in the rural areas. It would not hurt AT&T (or Verizon or Sprint) to allow people outside their coverage areas to own one of their exclusive phones.
Verizon's 3G coverage speed is only a littler faster than AT&T's edge network. AT&T's 3G coverage is way faster than Verizon.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Either you're just a blind fanboy or you've done nothing but read Wiki articles about this stuff. Verizon's EVDO blows AT&T's edge out of the water, and is really close to AT&T's 3G. Yea, theoretically 3G is faster than EVDO but real world experience has been anything but. I've ran speed tests on my iPhone with 3G turned on (and strong 3G signal) where I got near dial-up speeds, on way more than one occasion.
iPhone data plans don't even come close to paying for what AT&T's doing.With all the $$ AT&T is making from iPhone data plans you think they could have atleast HALF the network as Verizon.
According to the ad, Verizon has FIVE times the 3G coverage.