You're paying 74$ monthly? Wow Im only paying 15$ more on AT&T (on the rollover plan with more minutes than ill ever use) with way better LTE and reception everywhere I go! Like inside of buildings and stuff too!
Yeah, I used to be like you. And admittedly, AT&T has marginally more coverage than T-Mobile in some regions, but not by a whole lot in my experience of late. Of course, everyone's mileage may vary. But saving $40 a month off my bill and getting more data in exchange (for both my iPhone AND iPad, rather than just having to tether off the iPhone) is really, really nice, and I haven't been wanting in coverage either, including inside buildings. I've even found a few spots where I used to just put up with AT&T not working, and now T-Mobile has me covered. Who woulda thunk it?
If AT&T is truly better for you (in that, you've actually tried out T-Mobile recently and found the coverage to be subpar) then all I can do is
feel sorry that you have to berate others to justify your continued use of them. If a carrier works for a person, by all means, let them use that carrier.
(Except for Sprint... there's just no excuse for using Sprint.)
----------
In any case, back to the topic:
They won't. The Target rep was blowing hot air. I din't even think AT&T knows what it's going to do, if anything when the iPhone 6 goes on sale in terms of data plans. But ending grandfathers unlimited is highly unlikely anytime soon.
I didn't realize I did all that in one simple phrase.
What I do see is that
1. You got sensitive, (maybe its to do with being on T-Mobile which is considered a poor network compared to VZ/ATT.)
2. You tried to rudely make it out to be bigger than it was and then had the attitude of "lets change the subject" like as if I was off subject when I wasn't... like as if your an authority. Suspect you feel the need to push that agenda. Again, see number 1.
3. I work at a steel manufacturing plant, everyone gets reception in the building except my dad who is the only one on T-Mobile on a Note3. He doesn't receive calls in the building and needs to go outside--this is as of yesterday. Ive been working in the cell phone industry for 11 years and know T-mobile well, on paper and in the field, from their history to their current situation.
4. And like I said before, 15$ a month or so isn't worth the hassle. If you had an outside the norm experience thats either a rarity/oddity that doesn't reflect the mass of users in your city and especially not nationwide, it could be your phone, or it could just be that your dishonest because... see 1.
A lot of people boast about having T-Mobile when the handful of dollars they save doesn't justify the slower internet and the B-level reception nationwide.
----------
Also I have never been throttled on my unlimited plan.
A lot of people forget you have to go over 5GB three consecutive months in a row before your actually throttled.
Ive never seen my LTE be any slower than WiFi.
People act like throttling is a common issue. Most of us have Wifi at Home and at work now.
All the extra stuff T-Mobile boasts is a moot point. It gives you slower internet for less money but its not capped off.
Well thats assuming I have to deal with being capped off in the first place, I don't. All I care about is not having to get charged money for extra internet if and when I ever need it.
Tmobiles boast all assume throttling is a real life issue. And sell you on the potential of that.
But on paper you're just getting slower internet straight up. My first 5GB of LTE are way better than your first 5GB.
And since I don't go over that, what ever boast you have about what happens when you go over is meaningless to me because I never go over 3 months back to back.