Ha ha. You've fallen for ATT (and other carriers) reasons for getting rid of unlimited data. Let's revisit ATT history ok?
Back in August 2009, ATT starting mandating (requiring) all smartphone users be put on UNLIMITED DATA. Read please:
http://bgr.com/2009/08/21/att-to-require-smartphone-data-plans-starting-september-6th/
"
We want our customers to have the best possible experience with their Smartphones. A predictable bill is a key factor in customer satisfaction, "
For consumers back in 2009, there was only one choice $30 unlimited data plan. There wasn't any other option. Corporate users paid $45 for unlimited data plan. So before the mandate if you had a smartphone, you could opt out of data. You could have opted out of iPhone data plan altogether. You had two choices, unlimited data or no data (put a data block on). Pretty simple stuff. The iPhone didn't have anything to do with data requirements. Just a money grab by ATT.
So ATT back in 2009 starting forcing any smartphone user to be put on unlimited data. Because they wanted to give users a "better experienced with predictable bills with unlimited data".
It's just a money ploy back in 2009. Once they realize they couldn't make any more more off data users on unlimited data. They started using "tiered data" as another money maker.
So when they switched to tiered data, they tried to blame heavy data users for congesting their network. You see they no longer use the "predictable bill excuse when they switched to tiered data". But it's been proven over and over again, heavy data users don't use much of their data during peak times. Most heavy data users are using it at off peak time.
So each time, ATT's lame excuse falls on its face. And yes I am an ATT shareholder.
The bottom line is ATT needs to show revenue to shareholders. Don't believe the excuses they make.
----------
You sure you are saving $70 a month. Are you losing your subsidy with this? Do you have to pay full price for your next phone?