Am I able to bump up my plan to 2GB for $25 before sunday???
I don't want to have to pay $30 for an extra GB that I won't use...
Yes, you can log on now and change it.
Am I able to bump up my plan to 2GB for $25 before sunday???
I don't want to have to pay $30 for an extra GB that I won't use...
Old Data Plans
200 MB / $15 = $13.33 / MB
2000 MB / $25 = $80.00 / MB
New Data Plans
300 MB / $20 = $15.00 / MB
3000 MB / $30 = $100.00 / MB
5000 MB / $50 = $100.00 / MB
$15 and $100 per MB is higher than $13 and $80. Isn't innovation supposed to make things cheaper? Someone is making a pretty penny off these latest increases.
Well considering that I pay $30 for unlimited and am getting tethered at the 2GB mark and slowed down to unusable speeds, the 3GB for the same price doesn't sound so bad....
As the 3 biggest carriers move to LTE, I have hope that people who use unlocked iPhones and other multi-band phones will have the ability to just swap SIM cards (Verizon's LTE phones have SIM cards) without any restrictions. The big four have benefitted from the fact that their networks are largely incompatible, thus stifling the ability of people to switch networks and lowering the demand for monthly plans that don't include the costs of a subsidized phone. T-Mobile is the only carrier that offers plans that don't include the cost of a phone, and they're encumbered with that stupid AWS 3G band.
AT&T listen to me. Allow tethering for free on every (limited) plan. A lot less people will despise you if you do this. And you still make money, because when people start tethering, they start buying more data for $10 a gig.
This is yet another money grubbing move by AT&T to try and make everyone go up to one plan higher than they want to. Low tier users are getting jipped, so they bump up to the 3GB. Those on the 3GB want to tether, so they must bump up to 5GB.
The cost of data should go down over time, not up.
That's partly because they don't have much in the way of zoning laws. People complain about bad signal, but they also don't want visible antennas.
Wish I had the unlimited data before they took it away.
This is nothing but a price increase. If you have $30 unlimited -- why pay $30 to get stuck with 3 gig -- at least the $25/2-gig had some monetary incentive.
Stupid AT&T.
Remember a few years ago when it was $30 for unlimited service....
So basically, they want to screw over people on the low tier plans (250MB) by charging them $5 more a month for only 50MB more data. Gee thanks AT&T :roll eyes: $20 for 300MB works out to $1/15MB versus $1/16.6MB before. 500MB would be halfway reasonable, but seeing as I am getting 2GB for $25 it makes no sense.
THIS exactly. I have the grandfathered unlimited data plan for $30/month. Just the other day i reviewed my data usage over the past 12 months and realized I never go above 2 GB in a month, and I was planning on dropping down to the 2GB/$25 per month plan to save $5/month (and to enable tethering once in a while). Apparently that option will be gone come Sunday.
Now I'm not sure if I should drop to the 2GB plan before Sunday or just hang on to my unlimited data. . . which I don't need.
So what do you imagine will happen? Will the next iPhone not have LTE, or will we go back to having different models for different carriers?There's a couple of problems with the idealism behind your statement:
1) Given that pentaband HSPA antennas are still highly uncommon, the idea that we'll get an LTE antenna that supports the majority of the LTE bands that are deployed and that are to be deployed anytime soon is somewhat bogging for me.
2) There will still be incompatibilities between the four major US carriers in the future Funnily enough. First off, Verizon and Sprint's fallback is CDMA/EV-DO; AT&T's fallback is HSPA+. This fallback is important for when you're in areas where LTE coverage is weak or doesn't exist. Then there's the matter of spectrum. Verizon is using certain chunks of the 700 band as well as the 1700 band for LTE; AT&T's chunks of the 700 band are incompatible with Verizon's. Sprint, meanwhile, is going to be using the 850, 1900, and 2600 bands. The ultraregionals are primarily deploying in varying chunks of the 700 band and/or the 1700 band. That's going to be a lot of fun for OEMs and their suppliers; I bring this up because, to my knowledge, there isn't an antenna that'll support anything being a single carrier's frequencies at the moment. And, in Apple's case, they prefer to have their iPhone be as single of a model as possible, so you're going to have to factor in the 800, 1600, and 2100 bands being used overseas.
Actually, it's $15 for 200MB (13.3MB/dollar). So $20 for 300MB is a better deal if you use it all (15MB/dollar).