Great that ATSC 3.0 will be coming out sooner. Thanks for the update.Could be sooner than that, before NAB in April the standards should be fully set for system to be in place at studios, is my understanding:
http://www.tvtechnology.com/atsc3/0031/atsc-30-standard-to-be-ready-by-2017-nab-show/279777
ATSC 3.0 tuner silicon already exists from LG and there are also retrofit cases:
http://www.tvtechnology.com/resources/0006/coming-soon-atsc-30/278850
![]()
![]()
Seriously, so it's straight up deprecated now? That sucks. Meanwhile, any PC (Mac or Windows) can be used to play videos from any source for at least the next 15 years.Pretty sure the ATV3 is not receiving any new Apps so it would probably have to be the ATV4.
A few years back, we were highly suspicious of our home Verizon ISP throttling Amazon Instant Video because it was downloading at such slow rates on our high-tier connection that we couldn't really use it. All other video services were fast. And Amazon was fast on our cousins' crappy TWC connection.Gee, I wonder how much Comcast will throttle that service.
all looks enticing. SlingTV was enticing though, but it had terrible stability. If they can pull it off, I'm all in on streaming TV.
Really? I can't think of any of the computers I had 15 years ago playing videos very well back then and doubt they'd have much luck with today's formats.Meanwhile, any PC (Mac or Windows) can be used to play videos from any source for at least the next 15 years.
Seriously, so it's straight up deprecated now? That sucks. Meanwhile, any PC (Mac or Windows) can be used to play videos from any source for at least the next 15 years.
15 years ago, PCs weren't very often used for playing videos. Today, they are, and the video formats aren't going to change in ways that require significantly more computation power in the next 15 years.Really? I can't think of any of the computers I had 15 years ago playing videos very well back then and doubt they'd have much luck with today's formats.
I'm not.Don't make things up.
I'm not.
Sure it can. You should check the history of 2001 Macintoshes. Remember that they came with iMovie. I used to edit videos with my friend on his 2001 PowerMac G4, and Apple released the FireWire-equipped iMac DV in 2001 with a focus on video editing capability. Of course, non-Apple PCs came with all sorts of hardware and could be even more powerful.You are. A computer from 2001 can not play any video file.
I am assuming it was meant to be U-Verse TV service. Why would they kill their Internet service?Killing off U-verse? Is that even practical with all the fiber optics that were laid around the country?
Do you have any datacaps on your plan?Charter Spectrum? I wouldn't wish their internet service on my worst enemy. They are about as ass-backwards of an ISP as you can possibly be in 2016. Why? They think it's perfectly logical to cap upstream throughput at 5 Mbps when the downstream is provisioned at 100 Mbps. On business accounts, they cap upstream at 7 Mbps (ooooh...thanks for the extra 2 megabits, Charter!) So completely asinine. They either don't understand -- or don't care to acknowledge -- that in this day and age of putting things in the cloud, upstream throughput is just as important as downstream throughput.
One of the major drawbacks of them choosing to cap their upstream throughput at either 5 Mbps or 7 Mbps is that if you're trying to upload a ton of data to the cloud and have an AirPort Extreme or Express router (which doesn't have QoS), the upstream channel gets completely saturated to the point that no other device on your network is able to send out anything -- even something as simple as a DNS lookup request, thus rendering your connection completely unusable for anything except the upload to the cloud. Have VoIP? Kiss your phone service goodbye while an upload is in progress.
If my family ever moves, one of my requirements is that the house be in a neighborhood that has AT&T fiber installed. If the neighborhood only has Charter service, it is a no go for me. I am that passionate about staying away from Charter. Charter wanted me to pay $120/month for 100 Mbps down/5 Mbps up last year. That's how much they charge if you only want internet service from them as soon as the promo rate expires. As soon as AT&T fiber was available in our neighborhood last year, I jumped on it and we now have 1 Gbps up and down and pay $70/month. Just for the fiber internet -- no bundle. Yeah, $50 less per month for 10x more downstream bandwidth and 200x more upstream bandwidth! Charter can kiss my ass!!
I thought there was NFL GamePass on Apple TV now. No need to go to DirectTV.My only question is can I buy NFL Sunday Ticket? It is literally the only reason I have DirecTV. I was a cord cutter for a year and went back for the football package. It is a need for me and even more for my wife.
Do you have any datacaps on your plan?
Yea but those channels keep your rates down. Yea Right.Will be interesting to see what the channel line up consists of. Is it padded with shopping networks, channels not in my native language, 12 variations on the news, and a plethora of religious channels? I'm not saying that the cable and satellite providers don't do this on their entry-level "150 stations for $29.99" offers either, but I'm sure that there are "just enough" channels missing to sour the deal.
Been using Sling for 4 or so months and loving it, except I want my traditional guide view. Got $60 off 4th gen AppleTV with Sling.
Would put Sling on hold for 3 months to try this and get free AppleTV, although a little more expensive than current Sling package, it includes more channels.
has anyone tried to get 2 atv4? Maybe signing up under spouse name for the 2nd atv4?
Still available.I think this promo is long gone.