Then, there goes Steve's "maximum $199"...![]()
Yep -- that is exactly why AT&T will not sell the iPhone 3G to someone who isn't "upgrade eligible" at the subsidized price ($199/$299). Well put.
Yep -- that is exactly why AT&T will not sell the iPhone 3G to someone who isn't "upgrade eligible" at the subsidized price ($199/$299). Well put.
What if that someone upgraded a few months ago & so is not eligible for an upgrade but bought an iPhone a couple of weeks ago? Having the iPhone trumps the upgrade eligibility, right?
Upgrade and Eligibility info...posted by our very own Arn (if you haven't seen it yet):
I have to agree with him -- this looks like the way it will be and echoes what the AT&T rep said in his email to me earlier today.
Arn saying it is good enough for me. He is always on point.
Edit: Gizmodo is now reporting the same:
http://gizmodo.com/5016912/ineligible-att-customers-need-to-pay-full-price-for-iphone-3g
What if that someone upgraded a few months ago & so is not eligible for an upgrade but bought an iPhone a couple of weeks ago? Having the iPhone trumps the upgrade eligibility, right?
To be fair, I was using the Gizmodo report as reference.
Having the original iPhone makes you "upgrade eligible" from my understanding.
arn
the way i see it, it would be almost criminal for att to try and make current iphone owners pay the full price for an iphone 3g and heres why.
when i bought my iphone on DAY 1, i paid the FULL PRICE AND SIGNED A TWO YEAR CONTRACT. no subsidies, no discounts, NOTHING. so att didnt lose any money in subsidies. i can understand making someone wait until they are eligable if att paid for part of their phone. but in this case att didnt lose anything as a matter of fact they should want me to upgrade to an iphone 3g so then they get at least 36 months out of me.
any comments?
the way i see it, it would be almost criminal for att to try and make current iphone owners pay the full price for an iphone 3g and heres why.
when i bought my iphone on DAY 1, i paid the FULL PRICE AND SIGNED A TWO YEAR CONTRACT. no subsidies, no discounts, NOTHING. so att didnt lose any money in subsidies. i can understand making someone wait until they are eligable if att paid for part of their phone. but in this case att didnt lose anything as a matter of fact they should want me to upgrade to an iphone 3g so then they get at least 36 months out of me.
any comments?
so after having my iPhone for 1 year
AT&T doesnt want me to pay $199 and have another 2 year contract? (1 year longer then original?) and also pay $10 more a month??
yes 36 months...they got my business for 12 months without having to subsidize anything. so by subsidizing the iphone 3g they will get me for another 24 months. sounds like a no brainer to me for ATT.
the way i see it, it would be almost criminal for att to try and make current iphone owners pay the full price for an iphone 3g and heres why.
any comments?
so after having my iPhone for 1 year
AT&T doesnt want me to pay $199 and have another 2 year contract? (1 year longer then original?) and also pay $10 more a month??
I spoke with Apple and an ATT rep today over the phone and they have both reiterated that you can get the iphone for $199 regardless of upgrade. They also said to ignore the stories coming out. I'm holding faith that they are correct.
UPDATE: WRONG?
wtf, why can't we just get some solid information?
I'd like to believe them but a little thing called logic prevents me![]()
So (as I've said before) I can sign up as a new customer on July 10, buy a subsidized Tilt or Centro or Blackberry, flip it on eBay for a big profit, then show up on the 11th and buy a subsidized 3G? Sorry, but I just can't imagine AT&T permitting this.
As far as those saying AT&T would not be "turning away business", you are talking about potential 3G buyers already under contract.
So (as I've said before) I can sign up as a new customer on July 10, buy a subsidized Tilt or Centro or Blackberry, flip it on eBay for a big profit, then show up on the 11th and buy a subsidized 3G? Sorry, but I just can't imagine AT&T permitting this.