Unlimited iPad data plan here, enjoying never being throttled. Glad to see they're loosening up their policies on the phone end of things, less of a chance they'll start to mess with my plan.
So you've been paying an extra $30 a month for 5 years?
Unlimited iPad data plan here, enjoying never being throttled. Glad to see they're loosening up their policies on the phone end of things, less of a chance they'll start to mess with my plan.
What does this mean though? If I have a non-unlimited plan (let's say 30GB a month), I won't get throttled even in a congested area. But those who have unlimited plans will get throttled in a congested area? If they don't have to throttle a person that pays for their data in buckets, obviously there isn't congestion to begin with?
Not necessarily. During congestion, it makes some sense to throttle the unlimited data guys to ensure there is sufficient bandwidth available for those who bought the bucket of data. From AT&T's point of view, those are the "paying" customers who have a higher priority than the "freeloading" guys with old unlimited plans.
That was AT&T's goal all along. They wanted to make that grandfathered plan so unattractive that you'd want to move to one of their more profitable plans.
Which is what never made sense to me about the grandfathered "unlimited" plans. Slow internet annoys me more than $10 per gig overage fee, or no internet at all for that matter. You are better off getting 6GB of data plan.fantastic news. when i hit my limit - 5Gb - i can't even stream a song without it chopping up.
Too late. I left for Verizon long ago with no regrets.
What does this mean though? If I have a non-unlimited plan (let's say 30GB a month), I won't get throttled even in a congested area. But those who have unlimited plans will get throttled in a congested area? If they don't have to throttle a person that pays for their data in buckets, obviously there isn't congestion to begin with?
Not necessarily. During congestion, it makes some sense to throttle the unlimited data guys to ensure there is sufficient bandwidth available for those who bought the bucket of data. From AT&T's point of view, those are the "paying" customers who have a higher priority than the "freeloading" guys with old unlimited plans.
Why would they throttle until the next billing cycle. Why not until congestion is gone
"As a result of AT&T's network management process, customers on a 3G or 4G smartphone or on a 4G LTE smartphone with an unlimited data plan who have exceeded 3 gigabytes (3G/4G) or 5 gigabytes (4G LTE) of data in a billing period may experience reduced speeds when using data services at times and in areas that are experiencing network congestion. All such customers can still use unlimited data without incurring overage charges, and their speeds will be restored with the start of the next billing cycle."
What does this mean though? If I have a non-unlimited plan (let's say 30GB a month), I won't get throttled even in a congested area. But those who have unlimited plans will get throttled in a congested area? If they don't have to throttle a person that pays for their data in buckets, obviously there isn't congestion to begin with?
If you read the quote from the article, that's what they're doing:
According to that quote, if you're are:
1) an unlimited plan user
and
2) over the threshold (3GB 3G/4G or 5GB 4G LTE)
and
3) in a congested area
then you may 'experience reduced speeds.
Each of those conditions are linked with an *and*, so they must all be true before you get throttled.
If you're not an unlimited user, the other two don't matter, because the first will never be true.
At the start of your billing cycle you're no longer over the threshold, so you're given the same priority as non-unlimited plan users.
When you're not in a congested area, then you're given the same priority as non-unlimited users.
At least that's what the quote says.
seems to be vague to me so how many towers are congested all the time ? and what exactly counts as congested?
That's not true in my case. I never used more than a gig of data a month on "unlimited" so I switched to the new shared plan. AT&T gives me 15gb per month, and I never get close to the limit. I also now have tethering and unlimited texting, which I previously would have had to pay for separately. But best of all, I'm saving $30 a month compared with the "unlimited" plan. So I don't see how it's more profitable for AT&T. It's certainly better for me.
Original iPhone data plan user here. Too bad AT&T! I already left and Verizon is EXCELLENT. I have much better coverage, faster speed, free tethering, and great customer service that keeps calling me about giving me free data and lowering my bill. Now Verizon costs roughly the same as my AT&T bill was before and I'm much happier. Their iOS 8 widget is great and helps make sure I don't go over my cap, which is a generous 7GB. On my original contract I started at 2GB and have only had the cost go down and the data go up. They even gave me a year of free data on my wife's iPad Mini 2.
So you've been paying an extra $30 a month for 5 years?
Too late. I left for Verizon long ago with no regrets.
Why would they throttle until the next billing cycle. Why not until congestion is gone
$30 a month for 5 years equals $1800. Sounds like a lot right? Unlimited iPad data plans are selling for $2000 on eBay. Not only does he get his money back and then some, but he got free data usage for 5 full years.
And if you're wondering why someone would pay such a large amount. If someone spends $100 a month on data (a power user), they make their money back in one year and a half. That is why these sell for $2000 and up.