The point is exactly the same. It's been 7 years.
Not quite 7 years. AT&T was offering unlimited data until June 6, 2010.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/06/02/us-att-idUSTRE6513H120100602
The point is exactly the same. It's been 7 years.
I'm currently just under 30GB with a few days left in this month's billing cycle. Have seen unthrottled speeds of close to 70 Mbps. I'm glad it finally works like it's supposed to!
Don't get too comfortable yet...It seems that ATT backed down from throttling iPhone Data Unlimited Plans, this is indeed excellent for the people that kept there Unlimited Data iPhone plans, out there, i mean it is great.
Now you guys pretty much have the status of the iPad data unlimited plan, enjoy ATT 4G LTE at full speeds.
ATT Unlimited Data and Verizon Unlimited Data is worth having.
For the people that stuck in there and kept there Unlimited Data Plans, i know ya feel a sense of relief.
Just out of curiosity, if you were getting throttled at 5GB and now use 30GB, what exactly are you doing with 25GB more data? Are you simply streaming more? I find my usage hasn't changed much.
AT&T should have dropped the plans immediately back in 2007/8 when it all went down. DROP THEM, PERIOD!! Instead they let these folks hang around forums making buttclowns of themselves whining about not getting there unlimited data plan from 2007.
Perhaps they just didn't update the messaging and it was meant more in the sense that "you may experience reduced data speeds in locations and times of network congestion"?It seems to me that "network congestion," a crucial but undefined term, will simply become the moving target that allows ATT to facially comply with the court ruling while still allowing them to set arbitrary use/throttle restrictions. For example, I'm on a grandfathered unlimited data plan, and received the following text this week:
"Your data has reached 75% of the allowable 5GB network management threshold. If you exceed 5GB this month, you will experience reduced data speeds."
I don't see the ruling as particularly helpful given this limitation, and the loophole thus will beused by ATT to maintain the status quo. Pyrrhic victory at best....
Do you have a screenshot of that txt message AT&T sent you? I used over 200 GB on my iPhone last month to test out this new "no throttling unless you are on a congested tower" policy. I never heard a peep from AT&T. I even took a trip into the big city ... still no throttling or issues. What city/state are you near?It seems to me that "network congestion," a crucial but undefined term, will simply become the moving target that allows ATT to facially comply with the court ruling while still allowing them to set arbitrary use/throttle restrictions. For example, I'm on a grandfathered unlimited data plan, and received the following text this week:
"Your data has reached 75% of the allowable 5GB network management threshold. If you exceed 5GB this month, you will experience reduced data speeds."
I don't see the ruling as particularly helpful given this limitation, and the loophole thus will beused by ATT to maintain the status quo. Pyrrhic victory at best....
I thought people despised Verizon and AT&T to the same degree? Basically two companies cut from the same cloth.
The only one with any actual goodwill being T-Mobile, which unfortunately suffers from poor coverage?
Do you have a screenshot of that txt message AT&T sent you? I used over 200 GB on my iPhone last month to test out this new "no throttling unless you are on a congested tower" policy. I never heard a peep from AT&T. I even took a trip into the big city ... still no throttling or issues. What city/state are you near?