Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
When I worked at an Apple Retail Store, there were lots of people who were willing to roll a data plan for their kids into their monthly family plan bill, but were unwilling to shell out $199 to buy them an iPhone.

Some people simply don't care about the latest gizmos and care more about how much money they actually have to shell out right now.

This is only for the US...
 
And you wonder why idiotic americans signed sub-prime mortgage contracts and went broke.

Well in more than a few cases these “idiotic” Americans were lied to by their lender. Let’s not be too hasty to call people idiots shall we?
 
It's also good for first time smartphone buyers especially if bundled with a cheap data plan.

Some people moving from dumbphones, just want basic browser, email access and 95% of the time they use still use their phones only for phone calls.


.
 
I would much rather buy the phone outright. T-Mobile has a nice no contract $30/month plan for new customers. I might get that eventually.

I was quite impressed when my phone (Samsung Exhibit 4G) handled AIM, a NPR radio stream, and a YouTube link side by side without a hiccup. I am still getting used to this. I chose this phone for the WVGA display and front facing camera.

agreed, one thing though t-mobile is EDGE for iPhones ...
 
Is depressing regarding the future of Western Civilization. The purchase price of a smart phone is such a trivial part of the overall expense. If our fellow citizens are unable to understand there is no reason to buy a "free" 3gs over a $99 iPhone 4....

Edit: Talk about an indictment of our teachers union driven educational system...
 
Which of these is a better deal?

iPhone 3GS for $0 up front plus $40 + $15 = $55 x 24 = $1320
or
Not getting a new smartphone, maybe sticking with an old android smartphone for two years and continuing to pay 55 each month?

In the first scenario, the carrier is giving you a loss leader for $0 and the second scenario would have you pay the same each month but get nothing in return except for the service that you are paying for in either scenario.

We seem to have a lot of "geniuses" here that cannot do simple math.

If you really want to save money then don't get a smarphone and smarphone plan.
 
Last edited:
Which of these is a better deal?

iPhone 3GS for $0 up front plus $40 + $15 = $55 x 24 = $1320
or
Not getting a new smartphone, maybe sticking with an old android smartphone for two years and continuing to pay 55 each month?

In the first scenario, the carrier is giving you a loss leader for $0 and the second scenario would have you pay the same each month but get nothing in return except for the service that you are paying for in either scenario.

We seem to have a lot of "geniuses" here that cannot do simple math.

if you think twice, it no brainer to get the $99 iPhone 4 (if you really worried about the $$$, let alone not worry about Andriod phones)
 
Personally I don't see this as such a stupid thing. If a person tries a 3GS and a 4/4S and decides that the 3GS is just fine why is that so wrong? Not everyone feels a need to have every little update that Apple/other phone manufacturers keep pushing every year.

I am still rocking the 1st generation iPhone and it still does what I need it to do. Would I like it faster? Yup. Would I like more memory? Yup. Would I like better battery-life? Yup(would have liked that from day one).

And I was all set to upgrade this year as I told myself I wouldn't upgrade until 64GB was available. Which now it is but over the 4 the 4S seems like it is really only a speedbump with Siri as a throw in.

So would the 3GS work for me? Yup. And for free it is tempting as I am already paying data. But I will probably just wait for the 5.

But there are many reasons people do what they do. If people are happy with what they have then that is really what matters.

As an aside though, I am sure Apple is very happy to have these legacy iPhones continue to sell. At this point the unit price for the 3GS must go continue to go down exponentially every quarter-million more they sell. It has definitely paid for itself.
 
wow.. don't people realize how old this phone is? Oh well some may enjoy it and if they can great.

It's testament to just how strong the synergy is between hardware+software on the iPhone. And really, it speaks to the overall strength of Apple's ecosystem.
 
I would assume the $99 8GB iPhone 4 is selling like hot cakes as well?
if you think twice, it no brainer to get the $99 iPhone 4 (if you really worried about the $$$, let alone not worry about Andriod phones)
If it was not $549 new, I would have considered one. My friends are trying to sell off their iPhone 4 16GBs in the ~$300 ballpark.

A coworker had an iPod Touch when we had to make a phone call. I made the off comment that I was glad that I had purchased my Android phone over just an iPod Touch. The GPS came in handy today as well. I just wish it would pick up a signal faster. It does outside in a park but it is much slower in my car. Once it is locked on it does not lose it though.
 
Uh, yeah. The service costs the same whether you get a subsidized phone or not so free is free.

My point was, if you're going to spend $1600+ for the service, why not pay an extra $100-$200 for a newer, more capable phone.
 
Which seems silly to me.

Free + $1680 over the two year contract for the cheapest voice+data plans.

Chip in an extra $100 or $200 to get a 4 or 4S.

But then most people never calculate how much that 2 year contract costs them for their 'free' phone. :)

You can get the 16GB iPhone 4S 'free' on a slightly cheaper 2 year contract in the UK. :)
 
My point was, if you're going to spend $1600+ for the service, why not pay an extra $100-$200 for a newer, more capable phone.
My point is if you are concerned about the service cost too much then you should not sign up for the service in the first place.

I could afford the upfront costs so I did get an iPhone 4S as an upgrade from an iPhone 3GS (which I sold to a co-worker).

In exchange for a new contract, I get a subsidy on the hardware cost and I get service which I would be paying for regardless if I got it from a contract or outright purchase.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Not sure why people are being so incredulous about this.

Free is free. These people have monthly contracts already. They will be paying monthly regardless of the next phone they get.

Before they had to pay an extra $99 to get and iPhone, now they don't. The monthly fee is a constant.

arn
 
The iPhone 3GS is a rock solid,good smartphone.


yep i agree with you. This is putting a great phone into hands that otherwise may have never had a chance at it. I dont know how many of you have tested out those free androids but they are sllllow with ****** screens and feel cheap.


Its too bad there is not a CDMA 3GS
 
Wow

Man you people are pretentious ******s.

Ever stop to think that maybe just maybe they were going to get a free phone, ANY free phone, and now that the 3gs is free they will get the APPLE free phone leading to more money for apple and more acceptance of apple products and more justification for your superiority complexes?:rolleyes:
 
My point was, if you're going to spend $1600+ for the service, why not pay an extra $100-$200 for a newer, more capable phone.


Lots of us live week to week. Most of us actually lol. Initial cost is VERY important.
 
There should be IOS6. That would not be good of apple to sell a product that is obsolete the next. That is good news though for a lot of 3gs users

Give me a damn break. The iPhone 3GS is 2.5 years old. And it just got a major update. That's unheard of, and extremely generous in this market. So no, demanding it gets the next update a year from now is stretching it- a lot. But I can already see the bitch-threads when it doesn't.

Also, I don't get your reasoning. So what, Apple needs to discontinue a product, then wait 2 years before releasing an update, so it doesn't 'obsolete' it? Thats a ridiculous, untenable scenario. It makes more sense to judge it by when the product was first released, not until when it was sold. Many android phones don't even get the updates released BEFORE the phone itself was released. I speak from experience.

And for those people blown away about why someone would buy a 3GS at this stage- My sister has a 3G, and I offered to gift her my iPhone4. She refused, saying 'mine is fine'. She is far from an idiot. For most non-techies, the differences arent as dramatic as we see them. She just doesn't care.
 
Last edited:
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

Before they had to pay an extra $99 to get and iPhone, now they don't. The monthly fee is a constant.

arn

arn, earlier it was $49
 
Surprised how many idiots there are signing 2 year contracts to subsidize a 3GS.



Lots of us live week to week. Most of us actually lol. Initial cost is VERY important.

If you can't afford an extra $100-200 when you're paying for a smartphone plan every month, you need to either wait a few months and save up money or get your priorities straight and not have a smartphone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.