so I have to pay extra to use my cell phone at home in the middle of Cambridge because AT&T doesn't get their act together? Negative!
Why in heaven's name would they charge an extra fee for something that is going to cost them NOTHING, improve their network, and drastically reduce complaints?
Yeah, don't hate just to hate. Building materials, proximity to tall buildings, and many other factors impede cell reception.
$149 isn't terrible for a guaranteed great connection. And if you can use your standard minutes from your cell plan, all the better!
Seriously. I for one am getting tired of everyone complaining about AT&T and the service.
For all those upset about AT&T relying on your internet to alleviate network stress, remember that the other providers are also doing the same thing. I don't see the big deal, but fortunately I have reliable signal in my apt. Femtocell is a good idea since spectrum is a finite resource.
Every major wireless carrier sells "microcells" to improve their in-building coverage:
Verizon does.
Sprint does.
T-Mobile does.
and now AT&T does.
So using your logic, EVERY carrier is basically admitting that their service is garbage, and if you want good service, then, well, you're just going to have to pay more.
To paraphrase you-
"Don't Love just to Love"
ARE YOU KIDDING ME? You think it's anyone's responsibility other than AT&T to give me the coverage I'm paying for? You think I am supposed to shell out more money JUST to get the coverage I should already be getting?
Honestly, I'm going to add a Paypal account to my signature, because if oyu think paying for NOTHING is a good deal, then I have a lot of nothing you can pay me for.
![]()
All U.S. mobile operators basically suck, based on a recent Consumer Reports survey.Seriously. I for one am getting tired of everyone complaining about AT&T and the service.
All service providers have issues, yes even mighty Verizon has service issues. AT&T has improved their network and it is now better than some others.
I was with Verizon before the iPhone came along. I'm very glad I switched to AT&T as Verizon is not as good as they think they are.
Every major wireless carrier sells "microcells" to improve their in-building coverage:
Verizon does.
Sprint does.
T-Mobile does.
and now AT&T does.
So using your logic, EVERY carrier is basically admitting that their service is garbage, and if you want good service, then, well, you're just going to have to pay more.
Apparently a lot harder than it is for an Apple fan to NOT buy an iPhone when AT&T doesn't give them the coverage that they need.how hard would it be for apple to sell their phones, and allow any carrier.
I don't agree that this should be completely free, the device costs money to make, you should pay for it. BUT it shouldn't be using your minutes while you're using your personal network for the call.
I dont agree with
1. I have to pay monthly to use the hardware...
1. AT&T/Verizon don't require you to pay a monthly fee to use the hardware. Sprint does.Ok let me get this right.
I agree with
1. I have to pay for the hardware......
I dont agree with
1. I have to pay monthly to use the hardware...
2. ATT does nothing for me to use my internet to transmit the call i am already paying for.
3. There goes future network upgrades now ATT can just tell you to buy a microcell.
This just went throught my head...
When you go overseas and are going to be somwhere that you can connect to a LAN with HSI...you get free roaming if you take your MicroCell???
is seems at though the level of intelligence in here is devastating. ATT 3g micro cell is identical to verizon wireless extender. it creates a mini cell phone tower in your house, supports ten cell phones at once and its great if your service isn't very good in your home. how is this a bad thing, you DO NOT have to pay a monthly service at all. you but the device, if you read correctly you would notice that if you wanted to take advantage of the rebate you can sign up for service and receive a 100 dollar rebate. Otherwise go buy the device, pay 150, don't sign up and don't get a rebate and quit whining.
I don't agree that this should be completely free, the device costs money to make, you should pay for it. BUT it shouldn't be using your minutes while you're using your personal network for the call. A flat-rate subscription like $4-5 a month seems more appropriate.
AT&T's network might need more capacity in certain markets but RF isn't magic, they can't just upgrade their network and make it work in your signal-blocking structure. This device has a market, but should be billed appropriately.
False1. I have to pay monthly to use the hardware...
How the hell do you think the call gets from "your internet" to the person on the other line?2. ATT does nothing for me to use my internet to transmit the call i am already paying for.
Right, because AT&T believes that people never leave their homes and go anywhere where they can't have a femtocell, like a mall or their job.3. There goes future network upgrades now ATT can just tell you to buy a microcell.
YOU DO HAVE TO PAY MONTHLY DEPENDING ON IS U USE YOUR PLAN MINUTES IT WILL COST $9.99 - $19.99 MONTHLY
T-Mobile's is called @HOME, and the device doesn't cost anything, because there isn't one. It uses your existing WiFi network (which means only phones with WiFi can use it)
Couldn't find much pricing info on their website, so not sure how they work it.
For a company like Tmobile with less footprint than the other carriers it makes a lot of sense. they've been doing it for years now. If i talked on the phone more I'd consider it, for $10 its not bad. which brings me to my point... i think the reactions here would be a lot less severe if the pricing werent so extreme. $20 is just way too steep for this kind of service.
Where do you see that you're supposed to pay for another subscription service? Because apparently all the usual AT&T haters see this written somewhere and I don't see it mentioned anywhere.I hate AT&T's service..in my house..Verizon is not a problem buy my iphone with AT&T sucks and now I'm suppose to pay $150 buck + another subscription service...I can't wait until Apple gets rid of AT&T cause it sucks
Q. Do I need to subscribe to an AT&T Unlimited MicroCell Calling feature?YOU DO HAVE TO PAY MONTHLY DEPENDING ON IS U USE YOUR PLAN MINUTES IT WILL COST $9.99 - $19.99 MONTHLY
Yes they suck, big time. They now want to charge on top of what a person pays because their in a deal with Apple and have a monopoly. That is one reason I hated Apple is still doing this, how hard would it be for apple to sell their phones, and allow any carrier. Come on its 2010 and we still doing business like its 1985.
I hate AT&T's service..in my house..Verizon is not a problem buy my iphone with AT&T sucks and now I'm suppose to pay $150 buck + another subscription service...I can't wait until Apple gets rid of AT&T cause it sucks
So now AT&T wants to piggy-back off MY internet connection? Seriously?
God forbid AT&T actually improves the cellular coverage. This is a band-aid fix to an enormous problem!
AT&T is basically admitting that their service is garbage and if you want good service then, well, you're just going to have to pay more.
This company is a joke, I can't wait until their exclusivity expires.
Agreed. Although the $20 unlimited calling is very Vonage-like and could allow you to dump your land-line entirely.
Can you configure your phone to "prefer" the microcell over some other tower that's in range when you're home? Or would that simply happen automatically since it would have the strongest signal?