Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's amazing how many ways AT&T can think of to screw their customers. From doing away with unlimited data plans to now this, possibly charging extra for FaceTime, even with unlimited data plans? Time will tell
 
It's amazing how many ways AT&T can think of to screw their customers. From doing away with unlimited data plans to now this, possibly charging extra for FaceTime, even with unlimited data plans? Time will tell

They don't have a monopoly, so I don't think they can do anything "wrong". But they can lose customers. I really don't care if they limit my 4G; in fact, I'd like them to so I don't accidentally chew up my 200MB plan quickly. On the other hand, someone with unlimited data will be severely disadvantaged.
 
at least you'll have the option. i'm on sprint in houston and can't even stream my itunes match library, forget about video chatting.
 
Seriously, how are we not going to be able to use the data WE pay for the way we want to use it?

Gosh, what ever happened to freedom in this country.

If AT&T wanted to build a cell tower in your back yard, wouldn't you want them to pay you for the privilege? Or would you just say "go ahead, it' a free country"?

You have the freedom to not use FaceTime. You have the freedom to move your account to another carrier. If you can find a better deal, that's what you should do.

Your nostalgia for a freer country in the past is misguided. Old-timers will tell you that real freedom was when we didn't carry personal communication devices on us at all times. And we used the POTS phones in our homes sparingly because long distance was ridiculously expensive. Less than twenty years ago, access to the Internet was something you paid for by the hour, and it was so slow it could barely handle pictures, much less video.

Face Time in those days meant you were standing only a few feet away from each other.
 
Last edited:
You honestly think AT&T will give you some sort of discount if you are an iPhone user and don't use Facetime on their network? You will continue paying the same amount...what's not to like!?

Bottom line is this isn't AT&T's feature. To charge for it is borderline illegal.

Now if they said "you can disable Facetime over 3/4G and receive a $5 discount" that would be more palatable. To simply charge an above and beyond fee for Apple's feature is seriously shady.

Might not be their feature however it is their network and therefore they can do as they please.

For all who think AT&T is crap, they have to make more money year over year for their stock holders being a publicly traded company. And if every one that commented left AT&T the amount of new activated lines a day would more then compensate for the annoyance in hearing you all complain.

There are plenty of other carriers out there. If you don't like it leave it.

QQ more.
 
Well, if they charge for it a-la-carte on top of our data plan while using our data like a "$4.99 per line add-on, uses your existing data plan," then I'll be pissed.

But if they do something reasonable like a $30 unlimited family FaceTime over 3G add-on plan where we have a separate data allotment for FaceTime only calls, I'd probably bite since I wouldn't be too comfortable with using FaceTime too often with the limited amount of regular data we have.
 
But I have a theory, perhaps the people that are receiving this message probably still have unlimited data plans.

I'm on an AT&T capped plan and have not received this message after 6 4G FaceTime calls. (I'm on Beta 3)

I agree with this theory. Just like folks on unlimited plans can't do tethering, they need to switch to a capped plan and pay extra for it, the same will apply to FaceTime over cellular. If you want to do that, you'll have to switch off the unlimited plan.

That's my guess, at least...
 
If AT&T wanted to build a cell tower in your back yard, wouldn't you want them to pay you for the privilege? Or would you just say "go ahead, it' a free country"?

You have the freedom to not use FaceTime. You have the freedom to move your account to another carrier. If you can find a better deal, that's what you should do.

Your nostalgia for a freer country in the past is misguided. Old-timers will tell you that real freedom was when we didn't carry personal communication devices on us at all times. And we used the POTS phones in our homes sparingly because long distance was ridiculously expensive. Less than twenty years ago, access to the Internet was something you paid for by the hour, and it was so slow it could barely handle pictures, much less video.

Face Time in those days meant you were standing only a few feet away from each other.

Oh please. There is no way to justify the BS that has become common AT&T practices. That whole story you wrote was pointless and totally irrelevant to the topic being discussed here. People like you are the reason companies like AT&T make so much money screwing customers over. Youre perfectly content wiping your chin and walking away.
 
Works fine for me too.. Maybe unlimited data plans are exempt from this?

The optimist in me thinks the "call to activate" may be for AT&T to warn users about overrunning their data... heh, yeh.

I think this is going to be a stick they are going to use on the grandfathered unlimited users - much like the tethering plans.

Those on limited plans probably will have this restriction removed.
 
American Carriers = WORST IN WORLD

They would charge you for the air you breath if they could.

Your data rates are a insane.

Tmobile here just launched Sim only 12 month contract £21 a month with unlimited everything and tethering is free. thats with 20% tax!
 
Oh please. There is no way to justify the BS that has become common AT&T practices. That whole story you wrote was pointless and totally irrelevant to the topic being discussed here. People like you are the reason companies like AT&T make so much money screwing customers over. Youre perfectly content wiping your chin and walking away.

Are you an AT&T customer? If so you are the same as everyone else who is complaining about Al this but at the end of the doesn't have the balls to leave for another company thereby also contributing. :'(
 
As if AT&T had a finger involved in developing FaceTime. Such BS.

"Watch Apple develop a new thing. Notice that it seems useful. Charge for it!"

WTF

This traffic surely doesn't cost them more than other data either.

----------

If AT&T wanted to build a cell tower in your back yard, wouldn't you want them to pay you for the privilege? Or would you just say "go ahead, it' a free country"?
So using FaceTime on AT&T is a "privilege"?

I assume installing an app on their network is too, then. Should we get an AT&T tax for installing iOS apps on their network? Just like how they bump the price for another feature they weren't involved in developing?
 
Yep and if ATT thinks I'm paying extra they can kiss my ass. I hope to god T-MO gets the iPhone this year. I'll take my 4 iPhone family somewhere else. I have not had any issues with ATT service wise, but this will push me to another carrier.

I'm pretty sure T-Mobile has the iPhone, or do you mean it's not for sure they'll get the new one this year?
 
Since we're all in agreement that this is nothing but disgustingly absurd greed. Lets talk about another practice thats stupid but sadly, we have accepted it. Charge for incoming text messages. How come we have to pay when someone spams our inbox? Just stupid. Practices here are getting more and more ridiculous.:mad:
 
Mobile operators are the biggest jerks. That's why I only use pay-as-you-go.
 
Americans being screwed over by carriers again. Nothing new, but still sad. This kind of data use discrimination will never happen in EU fortunately. Dont even think it would be legal.
 
such a rip off. so u guys have to pay for the actual data, tethering and to use facetime. are they gonna restrict iMessage any time soon too?

freakin nuts! its all data

but the worst is that the US seems to still charge for incoming text or calls? thats so 1998
 
Since we're all in agreement that this is nothing but disgustingly absurd greed. Lets talk about another practice thats stupid but sadly, we have accepted it. Charge for incoming text messages. How come we have to pay when someone spams our inbox? Just stupid. Practices here are getting more and more ridiculous.:mad:

Paying for incoming texts isn't any more crazy than paying for incoming calls.
Mind you both are crazy. Only in the US of A. :cool:
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    122.3 KB · Views: 83
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.