Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They have a 7 day free trial. It's worth a look. Coincidentally, I just decided against continuing my subscription with Sling on Monday after 6 days of the trial. The quality of the video was fine. The price was fine. There were a few hang ups that I just couldn't get over.

1. Most of the content my family would want to watch was on the orange tier, and all of that is confined to a single stream. So if I'm downstairs watching a football game on ESPN my wife cannot be upstairs watching a show simultaneously on HGTV.

2. No DVR capability

3. It still seems very hodge-podgy. Some channels you can rewind, some you can't. There's no real rhyme or reason about which ones can and cannot. Some local channels are available in some markets, some are not (I could personally only get Fox).

Would have saved my family about $60/month over what we have now with DirecTV if we went with Sling and took the orange, blue and sports package. But it just felt a little too half baked at the moment. Just doing a little research on the service it sounds like it has matured a good bit since it started last year, so hopefully it will continue to get better and it, or some other streaming option, will become good enough to get rid of the packaged cable/satellite subscriptions.

Sling does indeed allow multiple people to be streaming at the same time. Im watching in my room while my girlfriend is in living room watching right now, soooo, not sure why you think you cant do that. Possibly they dont allow on free trial but you can for sure do it.
 
Check out PlayStation Vue. It allows for multi streams, has a cloud DVR function, has more channels, and is only a little bit more than sling.

I cancelled my cable for their smallest package which is about 55 channels for $30 a month with no taxes/fees. I haven't looked back.

Actually signed up for a trial of this yesterday before I realized they don't have an app for Apple TV and I don't have a PlayStation, Fire or Roku. Trying to decide if I want to pick one of those up to give this a go.

Sling does indeed allow multiple people to be streaming at the same time. Im watching in my room while my girlfriend is in living room watching right now, soooo, not sure why you think you cant do that. Possibly they dont allow on free trial but you can for sure do it.

They do allow multiple streams, just not on channels in the orange tier. And that's where my family would spend the majority of our time.
 
They problem though is price. If I have to sign up for 1/2 dozen separate services I want to view content on, now I am at the price of a basic cable package. Bundling might be the only way to get costs down.

I agree.

Also, when people are posting what they want for what price, they are not mentioning whether they are including ads or not. Anyone that think they are going to get their 10-15 favorite channels for $20 without ads, it probably will never happen.
 
I wonder how much longer the cable companies are going to holdout on competing with Sling/Vue/etc.? The key selling point for Sling or Vue over traditional cable is the business strategy; lower cost, no contract, no hidden fees, better UX, customer service that isn't actively hostile. The traditional cable companies could adopt these business strategies and compete with the new internet cable services with almost no overhead cost. However, history tells us this is unlikely.
[doublepost=1474557488][/doublepost]
Actually signed up for a trial of this yesterday before I realized they don't have an app for Apple TV and I don't have a PlayStation, Fire or Roku. Trying to decide if I want to pick one of those up to give this a go.

The PlayStation Vue login does work with all of the Apple TV channel apps for the channels you get.
 
So this would be delivered over the ATT cellular network, right? That's the only unique advantage they could offer.
 
So this would be delivered over the ATT cellular network, right? That's the only unique advantage they could offer.

It's delivered over any network you want. Wired or wireless. With the added benefit of no data cost if you are on att wireless and in the directv app.
 
It's delivered over any network you want. Wired or wireless. With the added benefit of no data cost if you are on att wireless and in the directv app.
That's weak. Make a box, make it log onto ATT with no other contract needed, and get the direct tv service. Only way to beat Vue. ATT already has unlimited data for direct tv customers to stream.
 
No it doesn't. They aren't slowing anyone else's service down or speeding theirs up. If you stream their service over their other service it's free. It's an incentive for their bundled customers. It doesn't affect any other companies.
Net Neutrality is about any kind of special treatment (including pricing), not just speed. And anyway, it does slow others down because more people will be streaming stuff.

Wikipedia:
Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers and governments regulating the Internet should treat all data on the Internet the same, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or mode of communication.
[doublepost=1474570246][/doublepost]
Off-topic, but anyone have an explanation for why this is by the way? Watching something "OTA" (via Cable) is still trasnmitting some quantity of digital data, but there are no real buffering issues or anything of the sort.
I'm wondering that too. I can think of a few things:
- Same content for everyone, so people aren't loading the same thing more than once.
- Download only, so no bandwidth allocated to upload.
- Possibly better compression since it's meant for TV only, not generalized IP.
But all those channels still seem like a lot of bandwidth. Can someone explain it fully?

Edit: An answer on Reddit suggests that it's the first thing that does it, but I didn't think it through all the way at first. The answer didn't say the rest of this, but I'm thinking this is why: I was thinking about one household, but the cable provider supports millions of customers. I assume TV takes a lot of bandwidth. Running a high bandwidth line to each customer is trivial. The only reason it's hard to do that for Internet is that people can't share their bits, so their backbone (or local branch) has to support (Internet bandwidth per customer) * (number of customers on branch or backbone) total, whereas TV is just (Internet bandwidth per customer).

On top of that, I suppose the latency for TV doesn't matter much, so they can focus more easily on bandwidth, if it still matters at this point.
 
Last edited:
I'm wondering that too. I can think of a few things:
- Same content for everyone, so people aren't loading the same thing more than once.
- Download only, so no bandwidth allocated to upload.
- Possibly better compression since it's meant for TV only, not generalized IP.
But all those channels still seem like a lot of bandwidth. Can someone explain it fully?

Edit: An answer on Reddit suggests that it's the first thing that does it, but I didn't think it through all the way at first. The answer didn't say the rest of this, but I'm thinking this is why: I was thinking about one household, but the cable provider supports millions of customers. I assume TV takes a lot of bandwidth. Running a high bandwidth line to each customer is trivial. The only reason it's hard to do that for Internet is that people can't share their bits, so their backbone (or local branch) has to support (Internet bandwidth per customer) * (number of customers on branch or backbone) total, whereas TV is just (Internet bandwidth per customer).

On top of that, I suppose the latency for TV doesn't matter much, so they can focus more easily on bandwidth, if it still matters at this point.

This question was all ready answered by a few posters, pretty much all saying the same thing, but with different levels of complexity.
 
It's primarily bootlegged content from servers around the world. Some of it is in okay format, but most looks really shoddy on a good screen over 52". I have been playing with it a while now and the majority of content just isn't high end.

Then there is the whole legal / ethical thing...


I have not tried it but the video quality was something I wondered about and figured it was not up to par, is it still low quality with newly released dvd movies as I am aware that movies in theatres are usually cam quality but how about DVD releases?
 
Last edited:
Hopefully with better pricing, content, and UI than Sling.tv. Cancelled that after about 5 minutes.

playstation vue is good, much better than sling tv. they even work with tv network content allowing the subscriber to sign in with their vue creditials to watch content via the web. (just like traditional cable providers)
[doublepost=1474643178][/doublepost]
They're co-opting the whole idea behind cord-cutting by making it all about the content delivery system.

The real point of cord cutting is the ability to pick and choose the content one wants available in their own house (or on the go on their mobile devices). Selling the traditional cable "package" in a different form isn't really addressing the real desires of cord-cutters.

not all cord cutters are picky over channels. some of us just don't want to rent outdated cable/satelite boxes. we want to consume content on devices of our choosing.
 
yeah, that's the other catch to this whole mess. My only option for internet is Charter at 60 Mbps. It's actually great internet, no slow downs ever (even at night), rarely any outages, but it's $68/month with taxes. My other option is AT&T DSL at 6 Mbps...
Brighthouse charges me $58 for 25Mbps. 50 Mbps is $78.
[doublepost=1474812803][/doublepost]
My question is really: "Why can I watch whatever I want via cable, in HD, with no buffering as I switch channels, while watching the same content via streaming, requires buffering."
[doublepost=1474488193][/doublepost]
You can just pay for HBO Now however, and watch Game of Thrones that way. You can still buy shows this way, and at $12/month, it's about the same price as paying $3/episode.
HBO is $15 minimum. Brighthouse used to charge 19 for HBO last year. must have raised to 20 now
 
You cannot compete with theft. People who steal content are going to do so no matter what.

^^^This.^^^ Unless you can make the ease of obtaining media legally surpass that of obtaining it illegally. As proven with Music thanks to iTunes.
 
Actually signed up for a trial of this yesterday before I realized they don't have an app for Apple TV and I don't have a PlayStation, Fire or Roku. Trying to decide if I want to pick one of those up to give this a go.



They do allow multiple streams, just not on channels in the orange tier. And that's where my family would spend the majority of our time.
Ahhh, I see what your saying. Still, it would only cost $5 to add multi streaming to your orange channels. So for a extra $5 everyone could stream same channels at same time and..................they would give you 15 additional channels. In other words......blue tier. You get all orange channels plus 15 more plus simultaneous streaming on up to 3 devices for $25. So to think that you liked the service they provided but $5 was all that was holding you back, just seems a bit odd IMO.
 
Ahhh, I see what your saying. Still, it would only cost $5 to add multi streaming to your orange channels. So for a extra $5 everyone could stream same channels at same time and..................they would give you 15 additional channels. In other words......blue tier. You get all orange channels plus 15 more plus simultaneous streaming on up to 3 devices for $25. So to think that you liked the service they provided but $5 was all that was holding you back, just seems a bit odd IMO.

From everything I have seen on their website the multiple streams that you can add on are just on Latino and International channels.
 
From everything I have seen on their website the multiple streams that you can add on are just on Latino and International channels.

Can I watch Sling TV on multiple devices at the same time?

You can watch Sling TV on all of your favorite compatible devices. The number of devices on which Sling content can be watched at the same time varies based on the Sling service.

If you subscribe to our Sling Orange service you can enjoy one stream at a time. Any extras you add to your Sling Orange service will be included in your single stream.

If you subscribe to our Sling Blue service you can enjoy up to three streams of these channels at one time! This means you can enjoy FOX on your big screen, while your computer streams AMC, and catch up on the news with CNN on your mobile device. Any extras you add to your Sling Blue service will be included in your three streams.

HBO® is available as an extra for both Sling Orange and Sling Blue. Regardless of whether you choose Sling Orange or Sling Blue, you will be able to watch HBO® content on up to three devices simultaneously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mwd25
From everything I have seen on their website the multiple streams that you can add on are just on Latino and International channels.

Not true, maybe you should call a customer service rep as your not able to see it on website. Its pretty clear. From the website -
If you subscribe to our Sling Blue service you can enjoy up to three streams of these channels at one time! This means you can enjoy FOX on your big screen, while your computer streams AMC, and catch up on the news with CNN on your mobile device. Any extras you add to your Sling Blue service will be included in your three streams.
And as I said in my original post, I was actually doing it while I was posting here so I know for a FACT you can.

Here is a link, if you care, if you dont really give a sh@t I guess I'l stop trying to convince you.
http://help.sling.com/articles/en_U...s=Search&pn=1&getcategoryname=&getParentName=
 
Not true, maybe you should call a customer service rep as your not able to see it on website. Its pretty clear. From the website -
And as I said in my original post, I was actually doing it while I was posting here so I know for a FACT you can.

Here is a link, if you care, if you dont really give a sh@t I guess I'l stop trying to convince you.
http://help.sling.com/articles/en_U...s=Search&pn=1&getcategoryname=&getParentName=

Not really sure why you're getting upset over this. Maybe the link on the site is worded odd, but it reads like the orange channels can only go on a single stream at a time. ESPN, which is really all I watch and in the orange tier, is one I specifically tried before and when I tried to watch it on two different devices the first one would quit playing telling me that I had hit my limit on the number of simultaneous streams. The blue channels do have the multiple streams, but I wouldn't hardly watch any of those channels anyway (although I did have the Orange + Blue package during my testing).

I will reach out to their customer service to get a definitive answer on this.


----------

Follow up...

Sling replied to my email (pretty quick turn around on that....good on them) and confirmed that the channels in the orange tier are limited to a single stream.

Including a copy of their response in case anyone else ever needs the question answered.
 

Attachments

  • Sling Response.pdf
    90.9 KB · Views: 146
Last edited:
I have not tried it but the video quality was something I wondered about and figured it was not up to par, is it still low quality with newly released dvd movies as I am aware that movies in theatres are usually cam quality but how about DVD releases?

Sorry for the late reply.

From what I have seen, yes. The video on released movies is dramatically better. I gave up on it a month ago simply because the only thing I cared to watch on it that Netflix and HBO Now don't already provide are non-released movies (poor quality) and international soccer (mostly poor quality).

Additionally, using Kodi without the very best internet connection and Android device is like owning a PC... constant maintenance and tweaks when things are updated.
 
You cannot compete with theft. People who steal content are going to do so no matter what.

Well, that's a pretty absolute "no matter what".

Steeling takes time and effort and some of those people are paying for memberships or download sites (or something). Make it cheap enough to work and work in an easier way and people will buy it.

I can make a DVR cheaper than a TiVo (probably more storage and more features too) but the extra cost for convenience makes it a choice.

I own some of the movies on BluRay but when I had the convenience of watching them on prime, I didn't bother to get them out; I'm sitting there confident I already owned a higher quality copy but Amazon makes it so easy I didn't bother to get up and find the discs and deal with the inputs (and zipping through warnings and previews). Convenience factors in...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.