DIRECTV and At&T does have an advantage here though. They currently have contracts with affiliates to transmit locals over their satellite system. Since they already have a relationship with them they can leverage that to amend their contract to allow online streaming if it already didn't. Where as PS Vue had no existing relationship with them.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AT&T Unveils 'DirecTV Now' Streaming Television Service
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I haven't seen it mentioned, but I did see that they mentioned HBO Go logins would be available, so I assume they will have network app logins for other channels as well.
It hasn't been mentioned yet, and I honestly never thought about it. I hope they eventually add it, as I do use Watch ESPN
Maybe a dumb question, but will this allow me to access other tv apps? Like if I get DirectTV Now, will it step in as a cable provider for other apps like ABC, NBC, etc. that require a provider to get at live tv and full access within those apps? Anybody know?
I don't want to preach here, but I hear this push back so often. People don't want to or can't afford to make the upfront investment that would very quickly and very substantially save them money. Yet they will continue to spend on a monthly basis for years on end.
I spent ~$200 4 years ago to move to VOIP telephone and cancel my land-line service, which was $32/mo. The VOIP service is $4/mo. So $200 upfront has saved me $28/mo for 48 months, over $1,100 so far and counting.
I did some similar transitioning around TV services 2 years ago, making some (but not many) sacrifices to move to an OTA antenna plus Netflix. Do I miss some stuff? Sure. But after investing about $500 upfront for equipment, I am saving about $100/mo. So that savings is already at about $2,000 and climbing.
Cutting any cord, cable/satellite/phone, is not necessary simple. It will require changing habits. And it will take some upfront investment. But the savings are immense over time.
Gonna threadjack a tad here ... just this weekend tried Sling (had heard good things) and the OSU / UM game was nothing but a stutter-fest, when I was even able to get connected to it. 50Mpbs speed, network checked out fine, tried different devices (Mac / Phone / etc). Do you think this was this just a case of overload for them or do you have to deal with these kinds of issues fairly often? I'm trying not to judge by this one event.
See... I'd want it the other way.
I'd pay $35 a month to get on-demand access to all these channels' content.
Live TV on someone else's schedule is the old way of doing it.
Except for sports, of course.
Last edited:
I have no idea what you are talking about. I never said 10 cents for a show or $1 for a season. Or anything like that at all.
If someone else said that, perhaps you should respond to that quote instead of mine.
HBO for $5 sounds good.
But is it the HBO live channel "here's what were broadcasting now, watch it if you like" ?
Or is it HBO on-demand "watch whatever HBO show you want, whenever you want" ?
In this age of "TV over the Internet" why isn't EVERYTHING on-demand? Live channels are for chumps.
But is it the HBO live channel "here's what were broadcasting now, watch it if you like" ?
Or is it HBO on-demand "watch whatever HBO show you want, whenever you want" ?
In this age of "TV over the Internet" why isn't EVERYTHING on-demand? Live channels are for chumps.
here is something from the verge
http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/28/...w-streaming-tv-service-announced-release-date
http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/28/...w-streaming-tv-service-announced-release-date
Asked the same thing and we don't know yet. I guess I will check the watchESPN App on Wednesday.
You realize right now they make 5-10x what you would pay per episode per viewer watching one ad on broadcast tv? There is literally zero motivation for them to do anything different. You're living in a fantasy world. But you can get what you want right now in iTunes (or Google Play, or Amazon, XBox, etc). Hope in, buy an episode or entire season with touch ID. It's just going to cost a lot more that you seem to think it should.
See... I'd want it the other way.
I'd pay $35 a month to get on-demand access to all these channels' content.
Live TV on someone else's schedule is the old way of doing it.
Except for sports, of course.
Ugh, sports. The stupid whore that I'm obsessed with that makes all of this even more complicated than it needs to be.
Yeah that seems bonkers. $35 for early enrollment of the Go Big tier + $5 for HBO + no data charges for AT&T customers. I may cancel Hulu and Netflix for that. Gotta see how it actually handles first but that seems really good.
I wonder how fast they'd ship you the ATV with that offer? I already have one but could give my mum that for x-mas. Hrm...
I wonder how fast they'd ship you the ATV with that offer? I already have one but could give my mum that for x-mas. Hrm...
I think you might misunderstand the term "cord-cutter". It's never meant that an internet connection was removed from the equation. On the contrary, it means that everything flows through the internet pipe. True "cord-cutters" are out there, but they're primarily found in areas of Ohio and Pennsylvania (i.e. the Amish).
Also, the thing that differentiates this offering from other TV providers is that there are no service contracts and there are no equipment rental fees. That's big. It's basically Hulu except the TV is live and judging by the channel lineup slide I saw in the presentation today, the channel selection looks pretty good.
I'm a DirecTV customer and I'm taking a hard look at Now. My current bill is $93/month for the next to lowest package with two TVs. My family could slash our bill by more than half, get some additional channels we don't have with our current package, and lose a lot of the junk channels we never watch anyway.
I just have to convince my wife that losing the DVR for several months is worth the money we'd be saving each month.
$30 a month is breaking the bank for you? No offense, but you're probably every companies worst nightmare type of customer that wants everything's for free and cries about anything and everything
And why should I be cautious of DirecTV just because they are now owned by ATT? Sounds like the guy claiming millions of illegal votes. I have DirecTV, owned by ATT. It's reliable. Good picture quality on a 65" high end Sony LCD/LED 4K set. Just because you may have had a bad experience or have an irrational hatred of ATT, you shouldn't be claiming it's bad for everyone. You would have more credibility if you gave the reason for your warning. Yea, right. We'll never see that. Easier just to throw out blanket hatred without an explanation.
The biggest difference, IMO, is no contract, you can cancel or add packages month to month. For example, I have Sling TV orange package. During the Olympics I added the blue package for one month only to watch more coverage, and then canceled that at the end of the Olympics. I also turn off HBO Now for a few months out of each year. It's not quite the a la carte that we want, but it is much more flexible than cable bundles. Also, I own all of the equipment (my Apple TV, and I bought a cable modem instead of renting), so I get no equipment from the cable company that I have to rent and then return to them at some point. I have been saving $40-50 per month over what I was paying Comcast earlier for a cable/internet bundle + modem and DVR rental.
Last edited:
Movies are a different animal. People don't blink at paying $8-$15 for a ticket to see a first run movie. hen those movies make additional money when they are sold/rented and released to cable. You don't subscribe, the movie watching public willingly pays the entire cost upfront. A per title concept makes sense.
TV is different in that you are selling a series. And consumers have been unwilling (so far) to pay what it costs to get a return on investment for that series outside of the current model.
I do agree with you that profit is a motive. But you're asking the industry to drop a delivery method that's very profitable for something less profitable. I doubt many of the companies we work for are just looking to leave money on the table. I think they are trying to find a way to bridge the old distribution method to something younger viewers will embrace....but they aren't going to cut off their own nose to do it.
[doublepost=1480392378][/doublepost]
Great point. I also laugh at people on an Apple site where they literally pay 100% markup for every product, suddenly complaining about prices and profit margins.
Looks like Sling TV is starting to Beta test cloud dvr with Roku users. Beta testers will get 100 hours of Cloud DVR. http://blog.sling.com/announcements...s-on-sling-tv-with-new-cloud-dvr-now-in-beta/
AT&T today announced the debut of a new DirecTV-branded streaming television service, DirecTV Now, which will include various channel bundles at prices ranging from $35 to $70. Packages will include live sports, on-demand content, premium channels, and popular shows.
DirecTV Now will be available starting on November 30, and will give customers the chance to sign up for four different bundles:
- Live a Little - $35 / month (60+ channels)
- Just Right - $50 / month (80+ channels)
- Go Big - $60 / month (100+ channels)
- Gotta Have it - $70 / month (120+ channels)
Customers can check out any of the above packages for free for seven days from the DirecTV Now website, and to celebrate the launch of the service, the "Go Big" package is available for $35 per month for a limited time. Premium channels like HBO and Cinemax can be added to a package for an additional $5 per channel.
On its November 30 launch date, DirecTV Now will be available on both iOS devices and the Apple TV through a dedicated app. AT&T is even offering a special Apple TV deal, giving customers a free Apple TV with the purchase of three months of pre-paid DirecTV Now service.
On its November 30 launch date, DirecTV Now will be available on both iOS devices and the Apple TV through a dedicated app. It will also be available via the web and on Android and Amazon devices.
Along with DirecTV Now, AT&T also announced two additional video streaming services, "FreeView" and "Fullscreen."
FreeView is an ad-supported offering that allows customers to watch some DirecTV television content free of charge, while Fullscreen, which actually debuted earlier this year, is an on-demand streaming service that offers select TV shows and movies aimed at young adults for $5.99 per month.
For AT&T Mobility customers, data used while watching DirecTV Now, FreeView, and Fullscreen in their respective apps will be free while on the AT&T mobile network.
Article Link: AT&T Unveils 'DirecTV Now' Streaming Television Service
