Throttle 'em, whether or not you pay a fine. I'm sick of having full LTE reception and not being able to load anything.
What the heck? ^
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AT&T Urges FCC to Drop $100 Million Fine, Says Data Throttling Doesn't Harm Customers
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Why do ISPs do this kind of thing? Why don't they just provide unlimited internet ? increase the prices a bit and every one will enjoy the internet.
The demand is there isn;t it? There are other ISPs out there in many different countries that provide this already.
The demand is there isn;t it? There are other ISPs out there in many different countries that provide this already.
Is it good business to throttle these plans? Probably not. But should they be fined a ridiculous sum of money for people that were not willing to read the fine print? I think they shouldn't have to be fined a penny for it. If they do get fined, you won't see any of that money. It will probably kill quite a few jobs as well. No positives will come to the consumers from AT&T losing this.
If ya don't like it, switch.
If ya don't like it, switch.
I was affected by the throttling. After many years of paying for an unlimited plan and using an average of 1.5GB, one single time I went over 5GB and got throttled. That sent me on a path that ultimately made me switch to T-Mobile with whom I'm quite happy. One of my justifications to stay with AT&T was the unlimited plan that kept being grandfathered, but what good it is if it gets throttled badly past 5GB. Customer support refused to remove the throttling for the few days left on my phone cycle. I saw no use keeping an old plan without texting and limited voice minutes considering the unlimited voice and text plans prevalent now. Always worried about overages on my other lines.
Now AT&T cannot claim it didn't affect customers or that it was well advertised. It did affect me and I hope they pay the fine and don't get away with this egregious practice.
If you are not happy with AT&T or Verizon, and you are not happy with their plans, or overages I would encourage you to give a try to T-Mobile. It definitely is a more fun ride with John Legere's antics.
Now AT&T cannot claim it didn't affect customers or that it was well advertised. It did affect me and I hope they pay the fine and don't get away with this egregious practice.
If you are not happy with AT&T or Verizon, and you are not happy with their plans, or overages I would encourage you to give a try to T-Mobile. It definitely is a more fun ride with John Legere's antics.
The only bad thing is that this fine will eventually be passed on to its customers. ATT doesn't pay it. We do.
Exorbitant fines like that smell like opportunistic and predatory wealth redistribution.
Right. Breaks law, asks government to just let them go instead of fining them for breaking the law. This is the screwed up state of corporate America.
Some would argue it's because of threads like the 200gb a month usage thread we had yesterday and the day before. Where someone has used their phone connection as Internet for the whole house after closing their broadband account. If you sell a contract on the word unlimited you should stick to the contracted term, not talk about throttling in the small print.
Not sure about the USA but in the UK networks tie their contracts to the consumer price index and if they raise their contracts beyond this people have been able to fight and have their contracts ripped up in small claims courts etc
I've been asking my husband why we can't switch off of AT&T. He insists we've never had our data throttled. No, but we had our iPhone 6Plus preorders bumped out of order along with a lot of other forum members (we formed our own thread) and had our orders messed up on the order queue for over a month. Some members for much longer than that.
Then when I went to try and reactivate my iPhone 5 their horrible customer service people out in some call center couldn't even do that right. It took two calls and we still couldn't get a new sim sent out to us on time. One arrived late and it was the wrong kind.
This company is just wretched. My husband insists on staying with them because of the grandfathered unlimited data plan and the fact we are supporting his parents phones on our account as well. He also likes AT&T coverage when he travels on business. If it were up to me we'd go back to T-Mobile. I loved their service but their coverage was not good when we were with them.
Then when I went to try and reactivate my iPhone 5 their horrible customer service people out in some call center couldn't even do that right. It took two calls and we still couldn't get a new sim sent out to us on time. One arrived late and it was the wrong kind.
This company is just wretched. My husband insists on staying with them because of the grandfathered unlimited data plan and the fact we are supporting his parents phones on our account as well. He also likes AT&T coverage when he travels on business. If it were up to me we'd go back to T-Mobile. I loved their service but their coverage was not good when we were with them.
Macrumors the most drama queens in one spot. Nobody every said the speed was unlimited.
Now that's an absurd statement. Someone needs a reality check.
Now that's an absurd statement. Someone needs a reality check.
In which case you will experience slow net speeds everywhere in the world, depends on congestion, work on wifi!
Sprint does it. I can't speak for all areas, but AT&T has the best service in LA and Berkeley from what I've seen, and Sprint's and T-Mobile's services are absolute garbage around here. I'm sure it's more important to most people to have good coverage and fast connections than to have unlimited data. You have to TRY to use enough data to be throttled, maybe by using LTE instead of home broadband.
Last edited:
No, I'm sure AT&T pays at least half of it. If they could have gotten away with charging $100M extra from everyone combined, they would have already done it before the fine.
In the U.S., they seem to price it according to the free market. However, when you sign into a contract with U.S. carriers, you're guaranteed the contract price at least until it expires. They can't raise it halfway through or something.
I don't quite buy that logic. They pay it. If they pass it to their customers they become less competitive and might hurt themselves further. There are just some things that you cannot pass along. If you are an AT&T customer and are afraid of you being left holding this bag, by all means, dump AT&T before that happens
They made $3.2 billion in profit for q1. $100 million won't do any harm to them.