Because Verizon is actually modifying your web traffic and there is no way to disable it:
Modifying web traffic is a really slippery slope!
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AT&T, Verizon Using 'Perma-Cookies' to Track Customer Web Activity
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Because Verizon is actually modifying your web traffic and there is no way to disable it:
Modifying web traffic is a really slippery slope!
I previously dismissed my wife's comment about getting a lot of Ashley Madison ads on her Iphone. Maybe I need to look deeper.
And don't forget to reset the Advertising Identifier on your iOS devices.
Do it often.
Settings App -> Privacy -> Advertising (at very bottom of screen) -> Reset Advertising Identifier.
Reset it every so often to keep advertisers off balance.
Didn't work
Well opting out on the AT&T network didn't work. The tracker is still active, despite going to the website and all. I did restart my iPhone as well.
I'll check again in 24 hours, see if it takes.
Well opting out on the AT&T network didn't work. The tracker is still active, despite going to the website and all. I did restart my iPhone as well.
I'll check again in 24 hours, see if it takes.
Disturbing activity
So what happens when you change your device repeatedly, and you still have activity that doesn't appear on your devices, but it appears on your online bill (after the heart bleed / bash bugs came out)?
Fourth iteration of devices for my wife and myself, ... my wife has a murderous KKK-affiliated step-mother who tried to get insurance money to kill her when she was a teenager; she's 37 now and I'm 31 and it's been a decade of hell, ... and we keep moving and switching phone numbers and accounts and still, we look at our bill and there's messages to/from numbers like 000-013-1313 or something like that, that Verizon says "you should talk to the police about that" ... and the last time it happened someone added an authorized user to our account with her name, birthdate, address, and SSN under my mother's name (who works for the navy on sensitive technical stuff) and two days later instead of a response to the crime, we had two burly police and one skinny twitchy skinhead police officer (?) behind them demanding entry to our home at 10:30pm at night (saying it was "suspicious" we wouldn't just let three guys with guns who wouldn't give their names, badge numbers, call us, or set up an appointment into our home)... Durham, NC police chief scandal yeah it was just one fake 911 call. We experienced two, personally. And we aren't the one person on record as having had this happen to them. But the Chief says it's one, even though his internal memo says "some officers might have..." i.e. multiple officers.
Plus we were on the **** list from the start because the police eat for free at a restaurant/bar we worked for before the Irish owner's Irish employee admitted that he was friends with people affiliated with the terrorist Irish Republican Army moving drugs under the guise that they were guns through Ireland. But the police would rather make up ******** calls about our neighbors "thinking we might be smoking pot" than TERRORISM. Can you get more corrupt?
Here's a taste of what my wife's uncle on her step-mother's side has had to say. He supposedly makes 70-80 dollars an hour as a doorman, and if you believe that's his sole job function, I have a bridge to sell you. http://youtu.be/uC4j8NTkk70
So what happens when you change your device repeatedly, and you still have activity that doesn't appear on your devices, but it appears on your online bill (after the heart bleed / bash bugs came out)?
Fourth iteration of devices for my wife and myself, ... my wife has a murderous KKK-affiliated step-mother who tried to get insurance money to kill her when she was a teenager; she's 37 now and I'm 31 and it's been a decade of hell, ... and we keep moving and switching phone numbers and accounts and still, we look at our bill and there's messages to/from numbers like 000-013-1313 or something like that, that Verizon says "you should talk to the police about that" ... and the last time it happened someone added an authorized user to our account with her name, birthdate, address, and SSN under my mother's name (who works for the navy on sensitive technical stuff) and two days later instead of a response to the crime, we had two burly police and one skinny twitchy skinhead police officer (?) behind them demanding entry to our home at 10:30pm at night (saying it was "suspicious" we wouldn't just let three guys with guns who wouldn't give their names, badge numbers, call us, or set up an appointment into our home)... Durham, NC police chief scandal yeah it was just one fake 911 call. We experienced two, personally. And we aren't the one person on record as having had this happen to them. But the Chief says it's one, even though his internal memo says "some officers might have..." i.e. multiple officers.
Plus we were on the **** list from the start because the police eat for free at a restaurant/bar we worked for before the Irish owner's Irish employee admitted that he was friends with people affiliated with the terrorist Irish Republican Army moving drugs under the guise that they were guns through Ireland. But the police would rather make up ******** calls about our neighbors "thinking we might be smoking pot" than TERRORISM. Can you get more corrupt?
Here's a taste of what my wife's uncle on her step-mother's side has had to say. He supposedly makes 70-80 dollars an hour as a doorman, and if you believe that's his sole job function, I have a bridge to sell you. http://youtu.be/uC4j8NTkk70
Last edited:
Corporate STALKER LAWS need to be created.
I'm already paying for my cell and data service, I see no reason corporations should be allowed to track and/or sell your metadata without first, explicitly and in plain language, asking the end-user for permission.
I'm already paying for my cell and data service, I see no reason corporations should be allowed to track and/or sell your metadata without first, explicitly and in plain language, asking the end-user for permission.
Last edited:
This is absolutely true. Besides the obvious constitutional "right to privacy" issues, without laws stating such our government has sold the entire population to corporations for private profit. Corporations whose shareholders are members of Congress.
The very definition of "conflict of interest."
Any suggestions...
How do I force HTTPS? Is there any setting? Any help / guidance will be highly appreciated.
Even though I have opted out, I don't trust ATT or Verizon for that matter.
Thanks.
How do I force HTTPS? Is there any setting? Any help / guidance will be highly appreciated.
Even though I have opted out, I don't trust ATT or Verizon for that matter.
Thanks.
More slimy stuff courtesy of Verizon:
Verizon is launching a tech news site that bans stories on U.S. spying
By Patrick Howell O'Neill on October 28, 2014
Verizon is getting into the news business. What could go wrong?
The most-valuable, second-richest telecommunications company in the world is bankrolling a technology news site called SugarString.com. The publication, which is now hiring its first full-time editors and reporters, is meant to rival major tech websites like Wired and the Verge while bringing in a potentially giant mainstream audience to beat those competitors at their own game.
Theres just one catch: In exchange for the major corporate backing, tech reporters at SugarString are expressly forbidden from writing about American spying or net neutrality around the world, two of the biggest issues in tech and politics today.
rest of the story here:
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/verizon-sugarstring-us-surveillance-net-neutrality/?tw=pl
Verizon is launching a tech news site that bans stories on U.S. spying
By Patrick Howell O'Neill on October 28, 2014
Verizon is getting into the news business. What could go wrong?
The most-valuable, second-richest telecommunications company in the world is bankrolling a technology news site called SugarString.com. The publication, which is now hiring its first full-time editors and reporters, is meant to rival major tech websites like Wired and the Verge while bringing in a potentially giant mainstream audience to beat those competitors at their own game.
Theres just one catch: In exchange for the major corporate backing, tech reporters at SugarString are expressly forbidden from writing about American spying or net neutrality around the world, two of the biggest issues in tech and politics today.
rest of the story here:
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/verizon-sugarstring-us-surveillance-net-neutrality/?tw=pl
That's usually true, and the old addage applies: If it flies, floats, or f@#&'s, it's better to rent it.
...unless woodworking happens to be one of your hobbies and you enjoy working on boats as much as you enjoy cruising in them.
slightly off topic yet right on topic, does anyone know a good guide to understanding and setting up a VPN network for one's home network?
I know what a VPN basically does but I don't quite understand the gritty details or how to set up a foolproof network (like I hear if the connection drops, you're instantly revealed or something).
thanks!
I know what a VPN basically does but I don't quite understand the gritty details or how to set up a foolproof network (like I hear if the connection drops, you're instantly revealed or something).
thanks!
Ironically, many people complaining about his use facebook or whatever and have to realize that everything you do or share on the web in any capacity is likely tracked and or sold. That's how Zuckerboy got so rich. Selling your personal data and mining it.
Still, it's pretty dodgy. Glad I tend to stay away from smart phones.
Still, it's pretty dodgy. Glad I tend to stay away from smart phones.
At least AT&T are telling people what they are doing. Apple and the Government have been spying on us for years without telling us.
HTTPS/SSL/TLS means the data is sent encrypted from the originating host to the receiving host. In addition to proving the server is who he says he is, those technologies guarantee confidentiality. The telco can't see/change anything.
YOU ----------- TELCO ------------ SERVER <-- unencrypted
x *************************** x <-- encrypted
There is an exception to this, but if ATT and VZW are doing it, I'd be surprised. If they're configured as a root certificate authority on your device, they could decrypt the traffic from the server, insert their tracker and then re-encrypt it, posing as the original server. Your device wouldn't care because the certificate would look valid. Many corporations do this for their internal networks. If the telcos were doing this, it would be even bigger news than an HTTP header.
Do you know how cookies are sent by a web server? They're HTTP headers, just like the nastiness ATT & VZW are sending. They're part of the HTTP response. That HTTP response is enveloped by SSL/TLS when you use an https link.
The only thing that makes cookies differ from any other HTTP header is that when your browser makes a second request back to the web server, any cookies matching that domain are automatically sent back too--as HTTP request headers.
VPNs do defeat this.
Last edited:
I hate being STALKED by corporations.
Is this an issue only when using a web browser via cellular data, or does it involve mobile apps as well when using AT&T or Verizon service?
Now that I think of it does this affect when I use the WiFi connection on my cell too?
Is this an issue only when using a web browser via cellular data, or does it involve mobile apps as well when using AT&T or Verizon service?
Now that I think of it does this affect when I use the WiFi connection on my cell too?
Switched to T-Mobile
This was the last straw as far as AT&T is concerned. My family just switched to T-Mobile. We have more or less the same plan for $20 less per month than AT&T was charging, with great new features for communicating on our overseas travels. Data throttling, if it occurs, is at least acknowledged by our new carrier. T-mobile bought out my early termination fee with AT&T, and paid a lot more than my iPhone 5 was worth for a trade in. Hopefully, they won't join Verizon and AT&T in surveillance our iPhone cellular traffic, but I trust them more than I do AT&T. I'm glad this finally pushed me to switch.
This was the last straw as far as AT&T is concerned. My family just switched to T-Mobile. We have more or less the same plan for $20 less per month than AT&T was charging, with great new features for communicating on our overseas travels. Data throttling, if it occurs, is at least acknowledged by our new carrier. T-mobile bought out my early termination fee with AT&T, and paid a lot more than my iPhone 5 was worth for a trade in. Hopefully, they won't join Verizon and AT&T in surveillance our iPhone cellular traffic, but I trust them more than I do AT&T. I'm glad this finally pushed me to switch.