I don't have a Mac Pro, but I have noticed that on my 2.93 GHz Core 2 Duo MBP, CPU usage jumps to 85% and temperatures to 151 ºF (66 ºC) when I convert an audio track to Apple Lossless. This does not happen when I rip audio CDs. Hmmm...
I don't have a Mac Pro, but I have noticed that on my 2.93 GHz Core 2 Duo MBP, CPU usage jumps to 85% and temperatures to 151 ºF (66 ºC) when I convert an audio track to Apple Lossless. This does not happen when I rip audio CDs. Hmmm...
VirtualRain,
Nice work and testing! I had a feeling something was causing your machine to be stuck in this strange state and it looks like you have confirmed that. In any case, your thorough testing and observations are very useful and will hopefully help build our case.
I am over 6000 miles away from my Mac Pro but when I'm back on Wednesday, I'll reply with my exact temp stats..
Thanks!
Nice work VirtualRain.And at least you've a better idea of what's gong on. Any report to Apple is a good thing, and if enough come in, will push the priority level of the situation.
For stress tests, you need to use an instance for each thread. if you have hyperthreading on, you need to run one for each virtual core, so 8 on a quad core, and 16 on an octo-core or you wont get true temps. These are the kind of stats I was looking for. if some of you could run your 2009 mac pro with 8 instances for 20 min, that would help greatly. thanks.
For stress tests, you need to use an instance for each thread. if you have hyperthreading on, you need to run one for each virtual core, so 8 on a quad core, and 16 on an octo-core or you wont get true temps. These are the kind of stats I was looking for. if some of you could run your 2009 mac pro with 8 instances for 20 min, that would help greatly. thanks.
Hardly matters in this case.
He has proved there is a MASSIVE issue in the Mac Pro Audio Subsystem
well, when I use prime95 on my i7 PC at 4GHz, I get much lower temps when I only use 4 instances of prime 95. Around 70 degrees with 8 instances, and under 60 degrees with 4. but yah, I can see why you wouldnt want to go higher with the temps you are already getting. if more people could do the 4 instance one, that would be great.
That is rather high.Well the temps are roughly what the old non-HT temps would be.
My HT temps hit 90+!
That is rather high.
I'm taking into account that the temp reporting isn't calibrated, and could be 15C lower ( = 75C). Still high, but not as bad as 90C+ (especially in terms of electromigration).That is really high. There is no reason for a premium computer to go that high in temps. They seem to really have screwed up the cooling in the Mac pros.
well, when I use prime95 on my i7 PC at 4GHz, I get much lower temps when I only use 4 instances of prime 95. Around 70 degrees with 8 instances, and under 60 degrees with 4. but yah, I can see why you wouldnt want to go higher with the temps you are already getting. if more people could do the 4 instance one, that would be great.
We don't know what TjMax value is being used on the OSX temp utilities... and therefore no idea whether the reported temps are accurate... so there's no point comparing between OSX and Windows. However, I'm willing to bet your cooling solution is much more effective than that in the Mac Pro which only ramps up the HSF fan to meager 1000 RPM at around 95-deg C core temp.![]()
I know, i know. I wasnt comparing it to windows, I was just saying that using an instance for each thread is a better test to get the max temperature of your system and was giving an example of my computer using 4 and 8. And yes my sealed liquid cooling is probably better, but I wont get into that![]()
I thought I already posted this, but my message seems to have disappeared. I suggest we forget sending complaints to Apple and go directly to the media. Let's start writing letters and sending emails to the editors of the major Mac publications and news outlets. Apple needs the smack-down of bad press before it does anything to remedy this issue.
As long as the complaints are made directly to Apple, Apple will do nothing to fix the issue because it is not receiving any public scrutiny or attention. A thread in a Mac forum is not going to do anything to make Apple fix the problem. Perhaps some discussion of a class action is in order here as well. I don't think temperature is as big of an issue as the 20% performance penalty when playing music that should take less than 1-2% of CPU power. THAT is a very big deal, if true, and cause for claims that Apple misrepresents the capabilities of their system.