It appears they are not very successful. Since ANZ already offers Apple Pay now it's only a matter of time.
See you're not from Australia so you don't know exactly
It appears they are not very successful. Since ANZ already offers Apple Pay now it's only a matter of time.
First of all this is subjective and second it is completely irrelevant anyway. The key point here is that in order to have critical mass ALL banks have to stand firm together, but now when one bank saw that they can leverage this situation the bricks will fall quickly.See you're not from Australia so you don't know exactlyANZ isn't exactly the best bank here, they needed something like this to be different but it really hasn't worked that well so why would the other banks do it, they already have large amounts of customers.
This will be interesting to watch. Sounds like the banks are essentially asking for level playing field against Apple. Not sure that's such a bad thing.
Apple would rather never offer Apple Pay in Australia than compromise the security of the entire system globally.
NFC is just a technology used to communicate data. That's why you can't just add any NFC card to your iPhone, because there is also a backend that has to be implemented.How would it compromise it?
Aren't the inner-working of NFC hardware well understood? What new information would anyone gain from this?
NFC is just a technology used to communicate data. That's why you can't just add any NFC card to your iPhone, because there is also a backend that has to be implemented.
In order for Apple Pay to work on banks network the bank has to implement certain things that Apple tells them, but the banks are also asking access to those private APIs that Apple uses so that they can create their own ugly looking, crappy, user tracking version of Apple Pay.That's my point. Aren't these banks asking to add their own backend?
Or have I misunderstood their intent?
NFC is just a technology used to communicate data. That's why you can't just add any NFC card to your iPhone, because there is also a backend that has to be implemented.
That part is standard. Apple's proprietary contribution is the way they provide biometric security and isolate access to the NFC hardware from third-party software (both good guys and "bad hombres").Just wondering, the NFC protocol / standard used by Apple Pay itself is not Apple proprietary, right? Since it's compatible with Visa payWave and Mastercard PayPass.
That part is standard. Apple's proprietary contribution is the way they provide biometric security and isolate access to the NFC hardware from third-party software (both good guys and "bad hombres").
In order for Apple Pay to work on banks network the bank has to implement certain things that Apple tells them, but the banks are also asking access to those private APIs that Apple uses so that they can create their own ugly looking, crappy, user tracking version of Apple Pay.
Banks want API access to NFC chip, because currently you can't access it.You are not adding / cloning the card's NFC, but storing the card information into the Apple device which is then converted into a token. Upon making a purchase, this token is the one transmitted via NFC to whatever payment terminal that accepts it. It's the same as paying using any NFC capable credit cards.
The Apple device is simulating the NFC capable credit card. So if I'm right, I don't see anything proprietary on the NFC part of the Apple Pay except to get access the token processing innards of Apple Pay.
These old news are what it's all about.That's the old news from a month or so back. This article says:
"...have today announced they have narrowed the application to solely focus on open access to the NFC function."
I gotta say that, as a consumer, I can't think of a good reason that I should oppose this.
Of course I can explain why Apple doesn't want it. But for the consumer I don't see how it would lessen my own security.
Apple's NFC chip hardware is integrated with the TouchID chip, which is isolated from the rest of iOS. This allows more control over the authentication. Fewer opportunities for hacking.You are not adding / cloning the card's NFC, but storing the card information into the Apple device which is then converted into a token. Upon making a purchase, this token is the one transmitted via NFC to whatever payment terminal that accepts it. It's the same as paying using any NFC capable credit cards.
The Apple device is simulating the NFC capable credit card. So if I'm right, I don't see anything proprietary on the NFC part of the Apple Pay except to get access the token processing innards of Apple Pay.
After your security got breached you'd think of a reason.Of course I can explain why Apple doesn't want it. But for the consumer I don't see how it would lessen my own security.
Banks want API access to NFC chip, because currently you can't access it.
[doublepost=1486999499][/doublepost]
These old news are what it's all about.
Apple would rather never offer Apple Pay in Australia than compromise the security of the entire system globally. Australia is a small market by comparison. This will go absolutely nowhere for the banks involved and is a huge waste of time.
It wouldn't just be for these banks. It would end up being for everyone, and when something went wrong, Apple would be named as a party in the lawsuit, along with the banks, and possibly you, for suggesting there was no harm in opening it up.Then I don't see a valid reason to access the NFC hardware part of the Apple Pay for these banks.
It wouldn't just be for these banks. It would end up being for everyone, and when something went wrong, Apple would be named as a party in the lawsuit, along with the banks, and possibly you, for suggesting there was no harm in opening it up.
When they have the access to APIs they can to whatever they want. Loyalty cards, different debit/credit cards with all that nonsense, also their own Apple Pay type system. Of course they would track the **** out of it.But, why? It's not like that they will be able to support Apple Pay for free even if they have access to the hardware schematics and firmware source. The thing with Apple Pay is about the whole system, both hardware, software and the back-end, such as the token generation, validation with banks upon adding the card, validation of token during payment, and so on.
So no real security, then? Why not make the banks' systems open source, too?I'm all to make the whole thing open source. But to open for a certain few, NO.
After your security got breached you'd think of a reason.
Open source does not mean no real security. But discussion on this should be another topic altogether.So no real security, then? Why not make the banks' systems open source, too?
HiSo the banks should be charged money every time someone uses Apple Pay when the banks built the infrastructure themselves? how is that fair, also we already have a NFC payments system with out cards anyway so it's not like the banks have no NFC cards already.
EDIT: I assume you all ain't from Australia, so don't take apples side so quickly.
So the banks should be charged money every time someone uses Apple Pay when the banks built the infrastructure themselves? how is that fair, also we already have a NFC payments system with out cards anyway so it's not like the banks have no NFC cards already.
EDIT: I assume you all ain't from Australia, so don't take apples side so quickly.