Actually, there will be more people using Macs by the time this comes out of beta -- at a rate of about 1 million more per month.They're developing for the wrong platform. Where is their iPad app? No one is going to be using Macs by the time this comes out of beta.
It wasn't that overdue, though. Arrandale chips were slow to ship in volume. Apple usually doesn't like to announce stuff until it can be shipped in volume. The main complaint I have heard, anyway, is not about that, or performance, but, prices.The latest Macbook Pro upgrade was extremely underwhelming, and very overdue.
A lot of the tech media took note of Apple sitting on their hands then. OSX development has been stagnating.
How can you be so sure of what Apple will say at WWDC?OSX will not even be mentioned at WWDC. Usually there should be at least an early preview of what they are working on. Nope... they're going to try to make the last service pack (10.6 - buggy as hell) last that much longer.
Again, you sound so sure. Apple seems to be on its usual schedule to me. One thing I notice from the forums is that many people like the idea of a mini-tower, although, for myself, I think the iMac and Mac Pro cover things pretty well.Mac Pro is an abandoned product. Plain and simple. We're not talking three months. The damn thing hasn't been updated for over a year.
Apple seems to be on a pretty steady path with the Macs, despite the new idevices. I guess a lot of people want Apple to come out with new Macs faster, but, I'm not sure Intel's schedule really justifies that. The Intel 6-core chips are just now shipping in volume, for example, and they would be the logical choice for an updated Mac Pro. Also, Intel has some very high-end chips out now, but, if you're looking for a $2K system, a $1K CPU is kind of a problem-- Apple has historically not used the very high-end chips. Bottom line -- I haven't seen much of a change in Apple's Mac strategy, so, I'm not sure why a lot of people are worried that the sky is falling.Apple is too focused on building idevices for the lowest common denominator...not pros or even prosumers. It's working very well for Apple now... but I'm really concerned that Google will pound Apple out of the mobile space (they're faster and have amazing engineers)...and Microsoft is going to start take its share of the computer space back (Windows 7 doesn't suck).
As the positive/negative ratio suggests, this is big news for the platform. AutoCAD might not be the best, but as has been noted, it's a big player in the market.
As a mechanical engineering student, I have more experience in CATIA, not so much in AutoCAD. Our university teaches mostly CATIA for us, because it's CAD/CAM possibilities and generative design. AutoCAD is a decent package anyway.
Concerning computer specs, yes, we've been waiting for a Mac Pro refresh for ages, and we're in the market for one as soon as there's a refresh, but on a slower system you can always turn the fancy stuff off. Of course with more complex modeling, and for presentations you need to have all the materials show correctly and that can take a lot of power.
At school we use 3.0 GHz P4 machines, with 1GB of RAM and a 128MB mid-range ATI graphics card. This is sometimes a pain, when viewing complex systems with shading and material on, but it's still doable. And those machines are like 5 years old...at least.
How do you define "fully" 3D? I've used AutoCAD for nearly 15 years now and I've always considered it very useful for 3D modeling. Unless you are are referring to AutoCAD Lite which does not include 3D modeling.
I agree with Psykx. AutoCAD is nice but completely outdated for anything but simple 2D drawing and architectural design. Now if something like Solidworks, Catia, or Pro/E were ported to Mac (preferably Solidworks), that'd be something I'd be ecstatic about.
it is nice to see you happy ..........i am happy tooYES oh yes!!!!!!i will finaly be able to ditch bootcamp!
i cant tell how happy i am because of this
Meh AutoCAD for Mac... Excuse me for my lack of excitement but I'm waiting for 3DSMAX..![]()
I agree with Psykx. AutoCAD is nice but completely outdated for anything but simple 2D drawing and architectural design. Now if something like Solidworks, Catia, or Pro/E were ported to Mac (preferably Solidworks), that'd be something I'd be ecstatic about.
Try thisThere is no 64-bit carbon.
lipo -info /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/CarbonCore.framework/Versions/A/CarbonCore
lipo -info /System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Versions/A/Carbon
As a mechanical engineer I was weaned on Ansys and we also had CATIA, but I'll take Ansys. Then again Pro/E is one of the big players as well as Ansys and CATIA and of course so is Algor.
However, CAD has always been standardized on AutoCAD via its dxf format.
DWG and DXF are everywhere in the United States.
I won't speak for other countries.
This is big news and actually having this skill as a mechanical engineer makes you more able to get hired.
Programming in C/C++ with Numerical Analysis, OpenCL/OpenGL are also invaluable.
...I watched the video demonstrating the 'gesture' input and couldn't help but laugh. One-finger click has always selected an object. Two finger clicks that register as a right-click always bring up a contextual menu. Scrolling has always zoomed (or panned, depends what you like). Shift+scrolling has always done the 3D rotating (which SUCKS sometimes on a large set of 2D drawings...
It's funny that all these companies are coming to or back to Mac just as Apple are abandoning it.
Where do you get the idea that Apple is abandoning the Mac??