Not on iOS 26, but the auto-mix software that I've tried would normally work best with music that was written/produced with mixing in mind (usually electronic dance or ambience tracks or pop music heavily leaning into those styles). The further one gets away from that, the less impressive the results are.I really like this feature, but it doesn’t seem to work sometimes. Or maybe the songs don’t work well to be mixed
The grumpiness of this forum continually surprises me idk why even after all these years hahaha
As long as it can be turned off, it won’t matter to me.
The grumpiness of this forum continually surprises me idk why even after all these years hahaha
Hence the reason I still have a job for 49 years as a DJ!I really like this feature, but it doesn’t seem to work sometimes. Or maybe the songs don’t work well to be mixed
In the privacy of your own home, no problem. In a public setting especially for money, oh yeah!Feature seems like a good idea to me.
Do music studios and copyright owners have a problem with this? or do they consider it a non-issue?
Probably because a DJ would adjust the volumes of both tracks whereas I'm assuming Apple just mixes the two tracks full bore.How about having the volume check working properly instead of this crap?
I have playlists where even with volume check turned on I have to run to the HomePod to lower the volume when some tracks kick in.
Also how about if I ask who is the drummer on this song I get the answer instead of telling me the name of the band?
A built in musicologist my ass.
Yes but the volume check should prevent tracks to play at a disproportionate volumes, it simply doesn’t work. There are tracks that play so loud that you really need to run to the HomePod to lower the volume manually, because if you ask Siri to lower the volume you might end up with a calendar event created, or a text sent to your wife or something of that sort.Probably because a DJ would adjust the volumes of both tracks whereas I'm assuming Apple just mixes the two tracks full bore.
So…audio crossfade?
so you need an Apple Music subscription to use it
Lol. I obviously read it. I was posing a rhetorical question to express a point that it’s an just an overhyped transition style.If you read the item, it says "AutoMix is designed to transition from one song to another as the song that's playing ends, using time stretching and beat matching for a seamless shift." Those two things - altering speed and matching beats - make it different than crossfading, which is simply volume and has existed in Music, and before that iTunes, for years.
Since they already get their money from Apple Music streams, they have no single right to brag about artificial intelligence moving from one song to another🤣Do music studios and copyright owners have a problem with this? or do they consider it a non-issue?
I have playlists where even with volume check turned on I have to run to the HomePod to lower the volume when some tracks kick in.
I take the same attitude towards motor vehicles 😆
Perhaps horses and carts, combustion stoves, telegrams, and beating clothes to death on a rock at the river remain standard practise for some of the MacRumors user base 😄
It was the delivery, not the fact, that inferred the inclusion of grump 😄
Money 💰What’s the reason it requires subscription?!