Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Would someone with Tahoe installed take a gander at Music for me? I have iOS 26 on a spare phone but don’t want to risk my daily Mac...
In iOS Music for a while I have been able to go into a playlists folder that contains other playlists and sort it by most recently updated. however, on the Mac Music app there is no sort by recently updated option.
Does the new macOS Music update give the option to sort playlists within playlists folders by most recently updated?

Thanks (I have a classical folder and within it I have almost all of the Apple Music Classical playlists added to my library. some of them are updated near the end of each week while others are rarely touched)
Music crashes when it's Delivering Your Genius Results and when you tell it to download an album that it should have already auto downloaded, whichever comes first.
 
Since they already get their money from Apple Music streams, they have no single right to brag about artificial intelligence moving from one song to another🤣

As the feature matures I guess it will be even capable in creating real mashups. There are already services that do just that, just not from Apple. Also “sorts of” mashup-ing is already possible on Instagram - you can take two different tracks when you making reels, combine them on the timeline and it would write “[song name]+[song name] mix [username]” when you post it.

Piracy is when someone tries to sell a mashup, so if someone actually wants to sell/publish they would need to acquire a permission from all copyright holders. Soundcloud in that sense is a gray zone, most people upload their mashups there with no issues



Those are issues with the particular music pieces. Read about loudness war for more. Labels and artists specifically make their tracks as loud as possible, up to the point of dynamics loss and track sounding like some evil creation.

This is especially relevant to music released from 2012 and until 2017, after that artists came to realization that using compressors doesn’t equal to making music sound cool.

Ohh and especially remasters! I hate them. Remasters of popular rock and pop tracks, they are extra ugly. Take some Ozzy Osbourne remasters or even from Phil Collins, I literally can’t tell is it is a 808 tom or kickdrum thanks to increased loudness
That’s exactly the kind of music I was referring to, but I still think the software should be smart enough to make it smooth and not blasting it out like that
 
  • Like
Reactions: parameter and uacd
Soooo... how do you turn it off? It's annoying AF.

Edit: Found it:

1749819220430.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just_Kevin
I love this idea. All music apps should have true crossfade, where the song starts while the other song is playing out, so you can listen to music while working without any silence in between. You should be able to truly control every aspect of it. The existing crossfade in Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube Music, etc. isn't very good
Generally agree. But where do you get it just right? Some songs cut in too early, some too late... Option should remain to a user to never utilize it on specific songs. That silence on occasion is purposeful, and given the song, gives more gravitas.
 
Hopefully the release version works as well as I've seen in the few demos going around. This is one of the little features that I'm most excited for, but I do wonder how it will handle playlists with many different genres, tempos, etc.
 
Ohh and especially remasters! I hate them. Remasters of popular rock and pop tracks, they are extra ugly. Take some Ozzy Osbourne remasters or even from Phil Collins, I literally can’t tell is it is a 808 tom or kickdrum thanks to increased loudness
YES!
The endless remasters that I keep hearing, are 99% trash. And then with streaming, you're stuck with that master version until the next one is released, which is usually some worse version. Not a fan overall of what the artists are continually putting out, or what I assume must be the artists since Apple themselves isn't doing the type of "remastering" that I'm talking about.

Just about all of the songs from the 80s and 90s that are streaming seem to be not just smoothly remastered to sound better, but full remixes a lot of the time.

Very glad I kept my CDs, I prefer the mixes on those to the "latest", "remaster" (major remixing + mastering).
 
Pray tell, what grumpiness?

If you think that asking for superfluous and unwanted software “features” to not be shoved down our throats is “grumpy” then you need to bone up on your vocabulary.

And stop with the strawman dismissiveness.
😂 seriously?! Self-paroding response aside, adding one more feature (out of the hundreds you never use and don't even notice) is hardly shoving anything down anyone's throat. Many other people will find extremely useful.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Generally agree. But where do you get it just right? Some songs cut in too early, some too late... Option should remain to a user to never utilize it on specific songs. That silence on occasion is purposeful, and given the song, gives more gravitas.
Some albums, especially from certain music genres are made to be played without any silence between tracks.
I wish, unless you already can, I have not actually looked. But I wish you could turn crossfading of any type on or off per-song.

That way I can select my albums that shouldn't ever crossfade and the rest of my music would use the default.
 
I am honestly stunned. Thanks for sharing that!

That is truly a big surprise and maybe some actual hope that Apple's path might be a bit more focused finally? Wow again.

My wow isn't for this feature really, but just the fact that it looks like they might actually be trying to finally unify things across their OSes.

Messages on macOS finally has parity with iOS, too. Other macOS apps have been freshened as well, but Messages was really behind in functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: parameter
Ohh and especially remasters! I hate them. Remasters of popular rock and pop tracks, they are extra ugly. Take some Ozzy Osbourne remasters or even from Phil Collins, I literally can’t tell is it is a 808 tom or kickdrum thanks to increased loudness

YES!
The endless remasters that I keep hearing, are 99% trash. And then with streaming, you're stuck with that master version until the next one is released, which is usually some worse version. Not a fan overall of what the artists are continually putting out, or what I assume must be the artists since Apple themselves isn't doing the type of "remastering" that I'm talking about.

Just about all of the songs from the 80s and 90s that are streaming seem to be not just smoothly remastered to sound better, but full remixes a lot of the time.

Very glad I kept my CDs, I prefer the mixes on those to the "latest", "remaster" (major remixing + mastering).

I agree most remasters are $ grabs or copyright renewal. But I think they're important and they need to be done correctly, to get the state-of-the-art sound quality off these historical master recordings while they're still viable. And I want the best possible sounding document of my favorite music.

However, remixing, or mastering them badly, distorts what made them historic to begin with.
 
😂 seriously?! Self-parading response aside, adding one more feature (out of the hundreds you never use and don't even notice) is hardly shoving anything down anyone's throat. Many other people will find extremely useful.
Yes, so long as it is optional. If it is, I have no problem with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lotones
😂 seriously?! Self-parading response aside, adding one more feature (out of the hundreds you never use and don't even notice) is hardly shoving anything down anyone's throat. Many other people will find extremely useful.
The problem is when feature-creep crowds out QOL improvements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lotones
If you read the item, it says "AutoMix is designed to transition from one song to another as the song that's playing ends, using time stretching and beat matching for a seamless shift." Those two things - altering speed and matching beats - make it different than crossfading, which is simply volume and has existed in Music, and before that iTunes, for years.
Seems like they are trying to replicate Serato’s discontinued program, Pyro which was pretty flawless for the most part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Does this only make sense for a specific type of genres, which is basically rap and hip hop? I don't know how this would sound for something like Country or Rock music. I would like to actually hear complete songs on both of those genres.

Or am I misunderstanding what this feature actually does?
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Does this only make sense for a specific type of genres, which is basically rap and hip hop? I don't know how this would sound for something like Country or Rock music. I would like to actually hear complete songs on both of those genres.

Or am I misunderstanding what this feature actually does?
Any genre of music that is 4/4 time should be able to use the technology.
 
Have to try this out. Liked the crossfade option. Looks like crossfade is getting replaced. Would have been nice if both crossfade and automix were available.
No - they will both be available to switch between in the music settings (but not both at the same time).
 
When it works it’s been amazing for me. I have mostly house music in my favourites though and I can’t imagine it working well for other genres (and I haven’t even tested it tbf). I’ve noticed if I play my playlist from the music app it’ll mix the tracks but if I ask Siri to play my favourite music it won’t. For what it is atm I think the feature’s cool but I wish crossfade would be enabled as a fallback when automix doesn’t work.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.