... Without a usable time machine my DVD recorder can't record something after it has been broadcast.
What model have you got?????? It sounds really rubbish!!!
... Without a usable time machine my DVD recorder can't record something after it has been broadcast.
Too true
Only difference between BBC and Sky is the size of the banners crawling across the screen "Breaking News! Breaking News! Breaking News! "
It seems people cling to fond memories of a BBC that (perhaps) once was but has now succumbed to market forces
(*spit spit spit*) Natasha 'Spangles' Kaplinksy.
![]()
well, this link certainly proves the iPlayer is being considered for the AppleTV:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/01/ip_to_tv_your_comments.html
Let's hope it happens soon. I would definitely buy one if it did.
Whereas once we had Moira Stewart and Anna Ford, we now have the likes of Fiona Bruce and (*spit spit spit*) Natasha 'Spangles' Kaplinksy.
![]()
Indeed… all £1,000,000 worth of her…Shes on five now thankfully
He was talking about people who decided they wanted to watch the programme after the programme had been broadcast. Without a usable time machine my DVD recorder can't record something after it has been broadcast.
True, but the point remains: us Mac users can still access the content on iPlayer. It might not be as great as a downloaded version (which it on it's way for Mac) but it's still there (and isn't that bad). Many people here were complaining as if we had no access to it at all.PARTIALLY.
On a PC you can download a better quality file, and have several days to watch it. On a Mac, it's basically you-tube for BBC - unreliable, current connection reliant.
Doug
Jesus! Some people need to sort out their reading comprehension!totally agree - we've paid for this content and it's discrimination to make us pay for downloads when PC users don't have to - the BBC are dragging their feet and it's patently unfair. they've already been warned by Parliament about this
hell they use Macs to make the shows but we can't use them to watch them the way we should be able to - you unpick that one![]()
Or.... just stream it!Roba said:The best solution for Mac users is just to buy Bootcamp or update their computer to an Intel Mac one
ascender said:Series 6 of Spooks for £16.99? And I don't have to waste days of my life ripping and converting episodes? Cheap at the price I say![]()
You can pause the download for the ones you don't want until the first one has downloadedWirelessly posted (iPhone 16GB: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/4A93 Safari/419.3)
exactly why I've just bought it. Wish if would download in order though: still waiting for episode 1 even though it's already done 2, 8 and 9!
Since when did Doctor Who EVER have anything but bad effects and bad acting??And as for news and programing there are far better choices than the BBC look at that atrocity Doctor who way to spend a lot of money on bad effects and bad acting.
In a word: yes.
I think the licence cost of £135 (~US$270) is already a complete rip-off. Even though the only BBC service I frequently use is their news website I still have to pay the licence fee since I own a TV.
I'd rather get an honest non-BBC review, what's it about and why is it crap?