I think since they called it Beats 1 we can expect eventually to get a Beats 2, Beats 3 etc catering to different audiences. All depends how popular the overall Music service becomes I think.
Exactly. I think, depending on Beats 1's popularity, we will see them continue to follow the BBC model.
Beats 1 is very, very similar to BBC Radio 1 (Zane Lowe's old station, let's not forget).
They'll almost certainly do a Beats 2, similar to BBC Radio 2, which is targeted at the 30+ age group with much less brand new music (with the exception of acts like Mumford & Sons, Noel Gallagher etc etc) and more music from previous decades.
Really? If the customers are not paying for it, then who is? Or are all the people who work on Beats 1 working for free? The music licenses are given for free by the musicians? The equipment and bandwidth are free? I doubt it. So Apple is paying for this. And the customers are paying Apple. The customers who buy iPhones, iPads and Macs. I don't know how many of Apple's paying customers belong to the "hip" Beats 1 demographic, but I'd claim that there is a rather large portion who doesn't. Sure, you can't satisfy everyone, and even if Apple offers 20 radio stations, people will still complain that they are not getting the Indonesian polka ska that they adore so much. But the immense focus on one single station with a very specific style both in terms of DJs and in terms of music selection that appeals to one specific demographic is somewhat off-putting.1. Beats 1 is free for everyone to tune into, you're not paying for it. .
Ultimately, it's up to you to set up your own playlists. Tedious work, yes, but more rewarding than waiting for someone to do it for you.No, but you can tell siri to "play music from the 80's", etc. This is what I was looking for too, but there's probably a way to set one up. I just haven't spent time on it to figure it out.