Honestly, I feel like Apple’s running Beats almost as a completely separate brand. There’s not really a lot of cross-pollination, and Beats devices don’t really seem to slot into the matrix of Apple’s AirPods/HomePod range. Maybe there are a few Beats products that do, but most Beats items seem to be doing their own thing and tend to target a different market segment than Apple’s audio range.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Beats Pill Bluetooth Speaker Makes a Comeback With Improved Sound, Water Resistance, and a Lower Price Tag
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Would have loved 2 ports and 3.5mm, but, I understand the changes, and at the price point I like this a lot. Definitely getting it
I mostly use a bluetooth speaker sitting directly in front of it while I work. In no world will mono sound better
No thanks. I love Apple products, but the Creative Labs iRoar Go is a much better speaker for a much lower price. It includes two tweeter/mid speakers and two passive bass ports allowing stereo sound, on-device playback control, an equalizer, and app connectivity. It only has a micro-USB connection, not USB-C, but it also includes USB-A power out, headphone jack stereo in, and a built-in MP3/AAC player with a removable micro SD card. The Beats Pill is ancient by comparison. https://us.creative.com/p/speakers/creative-iroar-go
Bose Soundlink III is a brilliant speaker. Still use mine. Love the look. Like an old radio.
I’ve got the Soundlink II and it still sounds great and the battery surprisingly still solid. My speaker of choice in the backyard.
I can get "bearable sound" out of my Studios by wearing a semi thick wool beanie, that would carry me through 1/2hr, nothing more. Without the beanie, a song would be pushing it. Spacewasters.
So they are like loud $10 BT speakers? Skip. I do wonder if Apple would ever make a portable "home"Pod
I can bet you that they're not like $10 BT speakers. At the same time, they're also not like $150 speakers. The real value is probably somewhere around 100.
I had the gen 2 Beats Pill, bought it on sale at a significant discount and still felt like it was a ripoff.
I have significant doubts about this, and if it no longer has a 3.5mm input I'd never buy it anyway - its more important to me than Bluetooth support.
I have significant doubts about this, and if it no longer has a 3.5mm input I'd never buy it anyway - its more important to me than Bluetooth support.
Why not use USB-C and get lossless instead of 3.5?
This, but tbh I doubt you'll hear better sound quality on it. Bluetooth will be sufficient to get the max out of it.
I could care less either way, but if you liked the speaker but the lack of a 3.5mm jack is holding you back, they do sell 3.5mm to USC-B adapters really inexpensively. I use one to connect my EarPods to my work computer & it works flawlessly.
CD player, iPod, laptop. Wireless devices - including personal phones - are not permitted in my workplace.
Bluetooth also connects to whatever device it sees first, which is not necissarily the device I want. My Powerbeat Pros were decommissioned real fast because they connected to whatever they felt like - its seems your AppleID shares out pairing with all devices you're signed in on. They were intended for use with my Apple Watch and nothing else, yet they would randomly connect to one of my 5 Macs or my iPhone.
i doubt it. I imagine we’d have heard by now, but I guess we’ll have to wait until actual users have them.
AirPlay or something like it is what I really wanted out of this.
Ok, that makes sense in your case. As mk313 said, if you really like and want this speaker just get that minijack-usb-c dongle.