Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We don't need more USB ports or Ethernet, we need hubs with at least 4 USB-C and Thunderbolt ports. Is there a technical reason why these haven't become common?
Because they're unnecessary - Thunderbolt 4 is a passthrough connection, you can have one input go out to another device then out to another, and so on. Extra USB C ports for data make sense, and some have a couple of those like the new CalDigit dock, which is by far the best dock on the market for the price and functionality but consistently out of stock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Florpy
This is literally the same device as the Anker Apex but $50 more expensive


Same - other than the case being different and the internals being different, with different capabilities. Also different DC power blocks with different input capacity.
 
All these "pro" model docks being released for hundreds of dollars that still give you gigabit. Multi-gig should have been standard for at least a couple years by now. Doesn't even need to be 10G, it can be 2.5 or 5.. but Jesus.. single gigabit on a TB4 dock labeled pro..

There's a tradeoff but this board many manufacturers are using was configured that way from the start. Probably because it's sharing the same 40 Gbps bandwidth as the rest of the dock, take up too much of that and you're going to lose video quality. CalDigit has 2.5 in theirs, though, and it's the first true next generation dock if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect and Florpy
Same - other than the case being different and the internals being different, with different capabilities. Also different DC power blocks with different input capacity.
Take a look at the port and button locations, it's literally the same board inside. Sure, there are some differences...and I'd choose this over the Anker...but I also can't argue why much more than because it looks nicer and has a better build quality to it.
 
I would never pay more than $99 for one of these. The price is ludicrous.
 
I picked this TS4 beast up and it’s special:

1645731848373.jpeg
 
Is every thunderbolt 4 dock that releases going to be criticized for having not enough thunderbolt 4 ports? The entire point of this technology is daisy chaining.
It should be. There is a severe lack of docks with thunderbolt / usb c ports. Considering how few Apple puts in most of their products, it is a big deal.
 
Some of us have our "go to" favourites to provide such docks and hubs. It might be wise to contrast and compare docks before buying this one. As for me, my needs were met with a simpler unit (Caldigit Element).
 
I saw the price for the cable thinking it was for the whole unit and was excited the price for these came down ?
 
So I'm in the market for my first dock. MBA M1, 1x 4K monitor, Logitech keyboard/mouse, webcam, etc.

What's the best one for the price? I keep leaning toward the CalDigit for the ports. And read Anker doesn't work with M1 Macs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iconoclysm
Kinda pricey, given that it doesn't even have anything faster than 1GigE.

The main idea of these docks is that the dock stays on your desk and you only have to plug in one cable to turn your laptop into a desktop.

But the Thunderbolt port that you connect to the laptop is on the front? So that cable is always sticking out?

Seems like there's a Thunderbolt port on the back.
 
Seems like there's a Thunderbolt port on the back.

Yes there is.

But there is a little computer icon on the front port. That's the port you're supposed to use to connect to the laptop. I'm guessing that front port is the only port that provides enough power for the laptop.

Check the CalDigit dock too. It also has a specific port for the laptop. But it's on the back.

:p
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Again, another dock designed specifically with Mac portable users in mind that doesn’t meet the ACTUAL power requirements for HALF the current portable lineup. These pro docks should provide 96W or 140W of power so that when an attached 14” or 16” is running intensive workloads it doesn’t drain the battery WHILE CHARGING.

Can’t believe these dock makers have not realized that. This sort of design misstep is what contributed to my 16” MBP’s battery aging faster than it should have…
 
It should be. There is a severe lack of docks with thunderbolt / usb c ports. Considering how few Apple puts in most of their products, it is a big deal.
Thunderbolt daisy chains. The intention is to go thunderbolt to the dock, thunderbolt to the monitor, thunderbolt from there to another monitor, the monitors loaded up with more connections, etc. The dock is meant to cover the PC peripherals and anything requiring another thunderbolt port would suck up the 40 Gbps limitation of throughput so it should have its own connection. The first manufacturer to load one up with ports will have complaints of choppy video output, I guarantee it.

This isn't just an Apple thing by the way, most PC's have just one Thunderbolt port - and my brand new high end HP laptop has just one extra USB C port.
 
Last edited:
Again, another dock designed specifically with Mac portable users in mind that doesn’t meet the ACTUAL power requirements for HALF the current portable lineup. These pro docks should provide 96W or 140W of power so that when an attached 14” or 16” is running intensive workloads it doesn’t drain the battery WHILE CHARGING.

Can’t believe these dock makers have not realized that. This sort of design misstep is what contributed to my 16” MBP’s battery aging faster than it should have…
You will never find one that outputs 140 watts as that is still outside of the spec. You can charge any of these pros on far less, it just won't fast charge, which should be fine when docking anyway.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: CYB3RBYTE
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.