Wait, really? I got refunded the $100 after I called for a price match.
View attachment 729659
If true, Great to see that.
Their price match policy is great, but I have had multiple times where they wouldn’t flex on their store fees. Back when we tried to purchase multiple iPhone 6 devices for a client, their “convenience fee” was a separate line item that was not removed.
Do you have the below “details” that you can share?
Please omit any personal information, but curious to see how they applied the credit, and what it was classified as.
As someone else stated. When bestbuy sells a phone at full price, they lose out on the money they get paid from the carriers when someone buys one on a plan. Makes sense that they upcharge, when they sell a fully unlocked phone they probably make nothing. Why not recover what Verizon, Att and Tmobile probably kick them back otherwise. Maybe $100. (P.S. I wasn't attacking you. Stating that you're ashamed to drive by is silliness was more my point.)
That’s fine, but it also assumes that Apple charges Best Buy full retail for every phone that Best Buy acquires to resell. Fully possible, but I doubt that.
My issue is more with how they handled the situation, and what they said in the first press release, and now what they are doing in response. Target (for instance) does not sell unlocked phones, they only sell phones tied to carrier agreements (At least in the case of the 8, and likely the X). They avoided all of this PR disaster by not openly taxing their customers.
Again, I like Best Buy, I just shake my head at their leadership decisions from time to time. I do the same with things Apple does from time to time

.