I know people love their Apple products, but I assumed it was more of a style issue. Recently, though, a friend kept going on and on about the better build quality and longevity of her Macbook Pro.
My question is - really? I am looking for a laptop that will stand up to frequent use, being carried around a lot, sometimes being sat on by cats, etc. If I can get more years out of it, then maybe it is worth the more than double price increase from a cheap laptop. I don't want to pay extra for fancy-computer-street-cred, but I will pay extra for a laptop I won't be cursing at in two years...
Thanks!
My experience has been that the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for MBPs ends up being lower for than for PCs, but only slightly. Example with figures from my sale (in SA rands, but applies also in dollars)
- Buy a Macbook Pro for R14 000. Keep it for three years, sell it for R7k. Cost per year? R2.3k
- Buy a PC Laptop for R10 000 (Toshiba). Keep it for two years, sell it for R4k. (In this example, my sister was forced to sell it because it was beginning to die and no longer useable - screen hinges cracking, battery dead, random reboots). Cost per year? R3k
Now, this only applies if people look after the machine. My experience is that a MBP stands up to "normal" use much better than most PCs, with the exception of some of the business class PC notebooks (Think a *good* Lenovo Thinkpad, HP or Dell - but then you are paying a similar price). However, their resilience in the face of abuse is similar.
So my advice? For people who look after their computers, get MBPs. For people who don't, get cheap PC laptops and good insurance, and tell them that they pay the excess if they break it!