Who gives a damn about this velociraptor? Using Android "due to pre-installed software" is a really stupid reason from someone like Gates and kinda a weak argument. He should switch to Windows phones, oh wait!
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Bill Gates Says His Preference for Android Over iPhone is Due to Pre-Installed Software
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Actually, you can download free apps in the Play store without creating or signing in to an account, at least as of about a year ago.You can. Just hit the “skip” button during setup. You can easily get into the phone without an Apple ID. However, if you want to download an app from the App Store or Google Play store you will have to have an Apple ID or Google account respectively. They are equal in that respect.
The point was that Microsoft did have a reasonable marketshare and lost it. At the time Microsoft had what they thought was a viable plan and the reality isn't that they dismissed the iPhone and lost but but they then didn't respond quick enough to Android who saw the shift AND gave away the operating system. Android provided the iOS like experience on devices that cost $200 versus the iPhone that started at $500. Arguably Google had inside insight into the device and what was coming that Microsoft lacked which meant that they were able to get a head start. They were able to pivot their new operating system from the Blackberry clone to the iPhone clone though it took them a while to get rid of the buttons.
So perhaps Ballmer didn't understand that it redefined the smartphone platform to make it accessible to more than just techies and business users however Microsoft was also starting at this shift from behind in 2007. It takes them three years to get their updates to Windows Phone 7 to market which is roughly the same amount of time it took the iPhone to come to it's first release as well. I'm sure they didn't react immediately but after Android demonstrated a similar experience they realised they too needed to make updates.
If Android doesn't exist, Microsoft continues to likely build their iPhone clone in Windows Phone 7, Blackberry and Nokia also still likely exist (remember that Nokia were looking to switch to Android as Microsoft acquired them) with Palm's fortunes perhaps ended a different way. Google undercut the market with cheap devices that meant that the smartphone marketshare grew to the point that feature phones aren't a thing any more. If anything it wasn't the iPhone that Microsoft missed, it was Android that globally now has something like 70% of the market.
In other news, Bill Gates purchase of a Porsche Taycan over a Tesla recently made headlines - however, Porsche doesn't support Android auto in their vehicles.
You are wrong
Its more about flexibility
Well, iOS is more like a train on railroad, Android let you go on off-road
Even some novices dont like to be on the railroad, on closed system which you cannot do simple things such as copying/transferring files without iTunes
I am on iOS side but it doesnt mean Android is meant for nerd users
Ultimately, i think the opposite, i ve seen many more ''nerds'' as you like to call them, on Apple side than Android
Ok now I understand his comment better. I totally forgot that my mom's android phone connects with her Windows laptop for photo sharing and what not. Definitely beneficial for some users, but admittedly my mom is not technologically savvy and did not know how to really operate that particular feature outside of the photo sharing/syncing ability.
The best example is their joint D5 interview. There's clearly an uneasy friendship and some mutual respect going on there.
Oh well, that’s his choice.
On another topic, I prefer the iWork Suite over Microsoft Office.
I can design a whole page like a poster or flyer or magazine style papers using Pages. It’s real WYSIWYG. Word is a disaster! I also love Numbers and Keynote; both are also great and easy to use, even on an iPad.
On another topic, I prefer the iWork Suite over Microsoft Office.
I can design a whole page like a poster or flyer or magazine style papers using Pages. It’s real WYSIWYG. Word is a disaster! I also love Numbers and Keynote; both are also great and easy to use, even on an iPad.
It has been well documented that Microsoft invested €150m in Apple when they were on the edge of bankruptcy in August 1997. Steve Jobs himself admitted that investment gave him the time to develop new products to save the company.
I haven’t heard anyone say Apple is a monopoly. However they do have a monopoly on the sale and distribution of iOS apps because you can’t buy them anywhere else.
CNBC "Apple was in very serious trouble," said Jobs.
Apple needed the cash to stay afloat and launch new products such as the original colour iMac.
Last edited:
Is this the point where we say McDonald's has a monopoly on the sale and distribution of Big Macs because you can’t buy them anywhere else?
I kid, I kid...
That’s nowhere near the same assertion. They were bleeding money, yes, but Microsoft did not singlehandedly fix that.
If anything, MS’s commitment to releasing IE and Office mattered far more.
I believe it. Even on his best days Gates was probably at best a decent programmer. But once MS took off as a company he had to step up on executive duties, and other than maybe puttering around I doubt he has those skills anymore.
Also let's be real that MS also got something out of this deal: a viable competitor. It was in their interests to have Apple around to point to as an alternative to their monopoly of Windows and try to demonstrate how Microsoft supported platforms beyond their own. The DOJ were already investigating Microsoft when this deal went down, $150m is cheap against the threat your company is going to be broken up.
This is just PR to get him in the public eye for his new book launch. As usual the man is an expert in domains he has zero training in. This time it’s the weather.
Also he famously banned Apple products in his home when he had teenage kids lusting for them.
Also he famously banned Apple products in his home when he had teenage kids lusting for them.
That’s not strictly comparable because McDonalds are selling their own products whereas Apple are selling other peoples products. Lots of people have a monopoly and it’s not illegal. It only becomes a problem if you abuse it. But that is off topic so I will save it for another day. 🙏Is this the point where we say McDonald's has a monopoly on the sale and distribution of Big Macs because you can’t buy them anywhere else?
I kid, I kid...