Have we reached a new level of anal here?
I think you mean new _depths_ of anal ...
Have we reached a new level of anal here?
I would like to see a photo of an apple Watch with Solar face without the clipping. I don't think it exists.
Is this something user adjustable, or can it only be rectified by Apple?
Mine and my GF's watch has the clipping but when we do screen shots and view them on an iPhone, they have no clipping.
Just when I think I've seen people get as obsessively anal as they can get about the most trivial thing, these forums prove me wrong. I'm sometimes think people want something to be wrong.Have we reached a new level of anal here?
That's all hear say. Show me proof of an Apple Watch that doesn't have it. I don't mean screen shots either.
Really? It is trivial when a display is clipping off image data? If you received an Apple Watch with a low resolution (non-retina) screen while others were retina, would that be trivial? What we are talking about here is the entire way the watch displays color... Something that will only become more important as the custom photograph wallpapers and more visual apps are released. If color is trivial, then why not just get an e-ink Pebble?Just when I think I've seen people get as obsessively anal as they can get about the most trivial thing, these forums prove me wrong. I'm sometimes think people want something to be wrong.
Calm down. You didn't have to give your credentials. I'm just asking for proof of this anomaly. That's it. Photoshopping doesn't count. Anybody can photoshop something. Does that make it more credible? I don't think so. I just looking for real examples.Whatever dude. I'm a lead photo retoucher at a top NYC retouching studio with 15 years of experience as a retoucher and 25 years as a photographer. I spend 50 hours a week obsessing over things like gradients and black points for a living. But what do I know?
It may be hearsay to you, but I saw what I saw (and so did the OP), but since you have an attitude about it, I have no inclination to bother proving anything to you.
Mine and my GF's watch has the clipping but when we do screen shots and view them on an iPhone, they have no clipping. I would like to see a photo of an apple Watch with Solar face without the clipping. I don't think it exists.
I bought a second watch at the Apple Store yesterday and in comparison to the watch I already had from release day the display is much worse, almost to the point that the new watch seems like a knock-off. My first watch has that great almost painted on laminated display look, and the new unit does not have that level of quality at all.
There is a huge difference in color contrast and gamma, and the new watch has the problem with gradients shown in this thread. It seems that it is just not able to produce the same color depth as my first watch. What I noticed right away was that in the Astronomy face you cant even make out the orbit circles clearly.
Anyone who thinks this is just fussing or too anal just hasn't seen the issue for themselves. Having two watches here to do a comparison makes the problem very clear, and it is greater to the naked eye than in the pics.
I actually made another thread about this and posted this pic which gives an example of the differences, new watch on the left:
View attachment 562251
Hm, just checked my 42mm SS AW. Clearly can see black clipping. Best way to notice it is to set solar face and twist the crown to get the sun moving. Then you can see it being a circle with very clear edge. Screenshots show much better gradient of course.
Wondering if it's a software issue - maybe they are trying to save battery. Say if it's 5% bright or below, set to full black. Pixel completely off = no energy drain. Just hoping it's the case.
Also, tried it on my wife's 38mm AWS. It's even more pronounced there. She got hers launch day, I got mine 5/29. Both running watchOS 1.0.1.
The picture below is not that great, but you can clearly see how the one with blue band has very clear circle with like no gradient. SS on left is better, but still visible. Both set to max brightness.
Being that 2 watches are different, it's hard to believe it's software issue then.
Anyway, it's too much picking. Actual UI and stuff looks fine on both. Just need to get this out of my head, lol.
P.S. Sorry for hairy wrist, but being around this forum you probably seen bunch.![]()
That comparison photo approximates the difference I noticed between my watch display and my husband's. His was slightly better with color contrast and there's a bit more crispness in focus to his texts than mine. But my orbit circles are more clear than the one on your SG watch. The difference between my husband's display and mine are not enough to bother me.I bought a second watch at the Apple Store yesterday and in comparison to the watch I already had from release day the display is much worse...
There is a huge difference in color contrast and gamma, and the new watch has the problem with gradients shown in this thread. It seems that it is just not able to produce the same color depth as my first watch. What I noticed right away was that in the Astronomy face you cant even make out the orbit circles clearly.
I actually made another thread about this and posted this pic which gives an example of the differences, new watch on the left:
View attachment 562251