Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’m not paying for a subscription with ads, and I’m extremely disappointed that anyone is. The clock is ticking and it’s almost time. They’ve all increased prices now to the point that the “ad supported” plan is the same or more as the original price.

Next year one of them will announce the end of the ad free plan. I wonder who will be bold enough to make the first move. If it’s even a matter of that, it wouldn’t surprise me if they’re colluding to do it around the same time.
Absolutely agree. PAYING to watch their hideous intrusive mind-numbing commercials that increase in frequency as you get further into a show/movie? Inane and insane. I'm out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gk_brown
It's a deal for those who are willing to accept ads in exchange for a lower monthly price. Maybe that's not you. But there are a lot of people who do.

Over 50% of new Netfix subscribers are choosing the ad-supported tier.

The company said Tuesday that more than 50% of its new sign-ups are for ad-supported plans in countries that offer the option


For Disney+, about 60% of new subscribers are choosing the ad-supported plan

During an earnings call on Thursday, Disney CEO Bob Iger addressed Disney+’s ad-supported business and how the company is attempting to move consumers to that side of the platform, adding that the increased streaming pricing the company put into place was designed to move people in that direction. He also cited that around 60% of all new subscribers are going to the ad-supported tier. According to Iger, about 37% of all subs in the U.S. are AVOD (advertising-based video on demand) subs, and 30% globally.
sheep gotta sheep
 
I don't get this new trend of both paying for a service and also watching ads.

Many consumers will pounce on it and this maximizes revenue for the sellers.

Much of the markets have been seller markets for at least a generation or two. Buyers roll right over and pay and sellers laugh all the way to the bank. Buyers used to demand more for their money. Now, they just focus on fitting a payment into the monthly total payments budget.
 
Last edited:
No deals on ad-free subs? Like others I refuse to pay a sub to watch ads. I only subscribe to Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Apple TV+. Netflix is the only sub that is purely for streaming because they have an unbeatable library. I was hoping for a non-ad tier deal for Disney+, but now I just sub for a month, binge what I want to watch, then unsub after
This is the way.
 
Less than 1 cent a month for Starz sounds like a deal. But I'm not seeing it.


These prices are more than 50% off though.


I don't think you understand how this works. They'd lose money if they dicounted their ad-free tiers. But by offering a discount on an ad supporter tier, it gives them more subscribers *and* it lets them more than offset the discount from ad revenue.
You need to log into your account and add it as a service. You will then see the sale price. I have Hulu with live channels. I’m not sure if it shows up without the live channels.
 
"You can get either Paramount+ Essential or Paramount+ with Showtime for $2.99 per month for your first two months this Black Friday"

They want you to pay for a trial of their service! Ludicrous! In August they actually gave away 1 month of Paramount+ with Showtime for free. There is a reason companies, including Apple, generally give trial periods away for free. They hope you will get hooked or just forget to cancel and then the automatic billing takes over! They also know that free trials lower user acquisition costs versus ad spend. You are doing them a favor if you pay for this "deal"
 
So many commenters don't understand that content creators also need to get paid. Just like this site has advertising and needs to get revenue when they can provide links to retailers... they are doing it to get paid. They aren't doing it all just to entertain you for free. Just like I assume most of you don't just do everything you do for free. [rant over]
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: gk_brown
I'm curious, because I recently tried for the first time to remove the "TV Provider" from my Apple TV to see what would load. I have both Peacock and Paramount+ and Hulu/Disney+ subscriptions, I know, I hate subscriptions also!

My question is about how things work now without the "TV Provider" set (Which was Spectrum's TV, which is expensive. But I could switch to Youtube TV or Sling or whichever IF I even need to?). I've tried using indoor HD antennas, but where I am, I'm not in range to get any of those OTA unfortunately.

Because I'm able to still watch all of my normal shows that are on channels such as CBS or NBC, they just open in Paramount+ or Peacock which is fine. Ones from channels like Fox or ABC can open in Hulu/Disney+. That is, without the TV Provider added.

I've yet to find a show that won't open in one of those. So, unless I want to sit and watch "live" TV, which I don't except for maybe some news infrequently, do I even need a TV provider?
What am I missing here, because canceling the Spectrum TV would save me a TON of money?
 
So many commenters don't understand that content creators also need to get paid. Just like this site has advertising and needs to get revenue when they can provide links to retailers... they are doing it to get paid. They aren't doing it all just to entertain you for free. Just like I assume most of you don't just do everything you do for free. [rant over]

They are getting paid twice, with a subscriptions and for ads..and they are personalized ads, which are worth even more.

Growing up, we had broadcast tv until I was 17 (1997). Content provides were rolling in dough, and they didn't have to harvest our data for ads. Forgive me for not being more sympathetic.
 
If you want to see into the future, notice that there are no deals on anything ad-free. While ad-free may cost $1-2 more per month normally, you can't even get the Black Friday deal and pay the difference. The only option is to throw any "savings" to the wind and subscribe for an ad-free subscription like any other day of the year.

Why? The ad plans essentially let them double-dip. They charge the customer for the privilege of watching ads, and they charge the ad agencies for the privilege of displaying the ads. Anything they bill the consumer above $0 for the ad-supported streams is gravy. At this point, I wouldn't expect to even see ad-free as an option a few years from now.

Without ad-free options, no thanks.

Either ad-free, or ads and it's free. No compromise.
Peacock is the best in this aspect since it allows upgrading to monthly ad-free for $6 per month after doing this deal. So a year of ad-free comes to $92 instead of the normal $140.
IMG_5396.jpeg
 
there was a time when we all paid hundreds of dollars a month to the cable companies...This is really no different
It is different. The technology available now supports an ad-free model. It wasn't possible with OTA or cable.
 
For sure, at first it appears that these deals are only good if you're someone who tolerates paying for a subscription that comes with ads. We certainly wouldn't pay for it.

On the other hand, look again! With Peacock TV, you can add a $6 a month subscription and turn it into a Peacock Premium Plus, without ads. You pay $20 for the year of Premium and $72 to turn it into an ad-free service. Only $92 total — compared to $140 for their discounted annual ad-free Premium Plus normal plan!

That's a good deal — indeed, it's great value compared to many other services — and there's lots to watch!

(The regular, full PP does give you more — download capabilities and live local NBC programming, but those make no difference to us.)

——————————-

Oops! After posting I saw that Dubious posted the same info about the money-saving Rube Goldberg approach to the Peacock TV deal. Great minds and all that…

——————————

By the way, I’ve read that the supposed ad-free Paramount+ includes ads and promos at the start of each show and episode, much like PBS unwisely does. Anyone know if that’s still true?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dubiousgif
For sure, at first it appears that these deals are only good if you're someone who tolerates paying for a subscription that comes with ads. We certainly wouldn't pay for it.

On the other hand, look again! With Peacock TV, you can add a $6 a month subscription and turn it into a Peacock Premium Plus, without ads. You pay $20 for the year of Premium and $72 to turn it into an ad-free service. Only $92 total — compared to $140 for their discounted annual ad-free Premium Plus normal plan!

That's a good deal — indeed, it's great value compared to many other services — and there's lots to watch!

(The regular, full PP does give you more — download capabilities and live local NBC programming, but those make no difference to us.)

——————————-

Oops! After posting I saw that Dubious posted the same info about the money-saving Rube Goldberg approach to the Peacock TV deal. Great minds and all that…

——————————

By the way, I’ve read that the supposed ad-free Paramount+ includes ads and promos at the start of each show and episode, much like PBS unwisely does. Anyone know if that’s still true?
I found an even better price but unfortunately too late since I already spent the $20. When you first sign up and do the annual Premium Plus then put the discount code “realdeal” and it comes out to $80+tax.
 
People have different values and tolerances and it shows here in this thread. I personally will not pay for an ad supported plan. The only time I see an ad is watching a live sporting event. Seeing those betting ads is just annoying but unfortunately many people will fall hook line and sinker for them. The only other ad I remember seeing is something from old navy, which if one has ever entered into an old navy store, will leave you scratching you head at how off it is. I have a young toddler, I would need to be a complete idiot to get the ad version. Never once has my toddler say, hey I want this X toy. I remember as a kid watching commercials for X,Y,Z and pestering my parents to get me that X,Y,Z toy. Thats something I dont have to deal with. The same with all of those stupid election Ads, I think I saw one or two from a live event, not dealing with the trash of advertising is priceless to me, but for some to save a buck here or there, they will fall down hook line and sinker.
 
If you subscribe to Hulu you can get Starz for .99 cents a month for 12 months.
You need to log into your account and add it as a service. You will then see the sale price.
For .99 cents (i.e. $0.0099) per month? I'm not seeing it.

How do they bill you .99 cents anyways? I guess they just round up to 1.00 cent.
 
It's a deal for those who are willing to accept ads in exchange for a lower monthly price. Maybe that's not you. But there are a lot of people who do.

Over 50% of new Netfix subscribers are choosing the ad-supported tier.

The company said Tuesday that more than 50% of its new sign-ups are for ad-supported plans in countries that offer the option


For Disney+, about 60% of new subscribers are choosing the ad-supported plan

During an earnings call on Thursday, Disney CEO Bob Iger addressed Disney+’s ad-supported business and how the company is attempting to move consumers to that side of the platform, adding that the increased streaming pricing the company put into place was designed to move people in that direction. He also cited that around 60% of all new subscribers are going to the ad-supported tier. According to Iger, about 37% of all subs in the U.S. are AVOD (advertising-based video on demand) subs, and 30% globally.
It’s basically free access for ads. I signed up. $4 a month for Hulu, stars and peacock. I am getting paramount ad free with my credit card for 3 months.

Figure I will try them and then cancel.

Peacock makes it very difficult to find movies and tv shows. And they have a lot. But they hide most of it.

Paramount+ has far less worth watching.

Hulu has tons of tv shows. Haven’t looked for movies yet.
 
No deals on ad-free subs? Like others I refuse to pay a sub to watch ads. I only subscribe to Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Apple TV+. Netflix is the only sub that is purely for streaming because they have an unbeatable library. I was hoping for a non-ad tier deal for Disney+, but now I just sub for a month, binge what I want to watch, then unsub after
Do you pay extra on Amazon Prime to remove the ads?
Speaking of Amazon, they have a few "channels" discounted to a couple bucks each for 2 months, which is long enough for me to burn through whatever I want to see, usually. Britbox and Acorn are up again, so I've already grabbed those.
 
Apparently if you're signed up for Hulu through Disney, you can't:



Kinda dumb since AFAIK the only way to get the ad-free Duo bundle is to sign up through Disney.
ugh this is what's messing me up right now now. previously I would just sign up for Hulu on black Friday and then get a Disney add on and a paramount or stats add on and now I can't get the deals on the others
 
  • Sad
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
People have different values and tolerances and it shows here in this thread. I personally will not pay for an ad supported plan. The only time I see an ad is watching a live sporting event. Seeing those betting ads is just annoying but unfortunately many people will fall hook line and sinker for them. The only other ad I remember seeing is something from old navy, which if one has ever entered into an old navy store, will leave you scratching you head at how off it is. I have a young toddler, I would need to be a complete idiot to get the ad version. Never once has my toddler say, hey I want this X toy. I remember as a kid watching commercials for X,Y,Z and pestering my parents to get me that X,Y,Z toy. Thats something I dont have to deal with. The same with all of those stupid election Ads, I think I saw one or two from a live event, not dealing with the trash of advertising is priceless to me, but for some to save a buck here or there, they will fall down hook line and sinker.


I forgot which service it was, but they only showed multiple ads before the movie or episode started. That I can actually deal with.

But ads that interrupt in the middle of watching, is something I could never pay for. I deal with that on Prime Video, only because it's just a perk of a subscription I already have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.