my aunt is about to buy me a computer this week. Should I ask her for the 2.4 ghz blackbook brand new for about 1200 or the new unibody macbook with 2.0 ghz for 1300. price does not really matter.
i'd get a blackbook...more power and cheaper
doesn't have the new screens or trackpad but you have to figure out if those are important to you or not
And weighs 1/2 lb lighter. Not to be discounted when you are traveling with you MB.Honestly I'm not sure why everyone is suggesting the black macbook over the new one. Sure it's a bit cheaper and 2.4ghz instead of 2.0ghz, but the other improvements in the new macbook far outweigh those things. Especially since the OP isn't buying it himself and price doesn't matter so much, I don't see why you wouldn't get the new one.
In a year's time the blackbook will feel old.
The new 2.0 AL macbook you get a much sturdier and nicer looking body, LED screen, faster memory speed, faster FSB, multitouch glass trackpad, ambient light detector and most importantly a much better graphics card. AND a design that will be current for the next few years. Also the new MB will be much better for Snow Leopard.
Just get the new macbook and be happy.
The Wi-Fi reception on the BlackBook will be far superior to the new MacBook.
The Wi-Fi reception on the BlackBook will be far superior to the new MacBook.
i'd get a blackbook...more power and cheaper
doesn't have the new screens or trackpad but you have to figure out if those are important to you or not
eh... less power
If you aren't going to be playing any games, the blackbook would be a better choice.
If you are going to do light gaming or maybe some high end games with the graphics set to low, get the UniBook.
The 2.4 version of the UniBook, IMO, is not a good value, because just for a little more you can get a MacBook Pro and for a little less you can save your money and get practically the same laptop without the backlit keyboard and a little slower processor. I have a MacBook Pro and even in pitch black lighting, I tend to never look at the keyboard so the backlighting does nothing for me.
Will spore run on the black book and will age of empires 3 run under bootcampp
On the earlier MacBook, gaming for all but 2D or particularly old titles is virtually impossible. In Quake 4, frame rates are so low as to be extremely choppy at 1024x768. An older-still game like Unreal Tournament 2004 does play within a few frames per second of a TV-like 30 frames per second at the same resolution, but it also has much less detail. And some games are entirely beyond the GMA X3100's scope; we wouldn't want to play truly modern games like Call of Duty 4 on Intel's stock hardware at all.
By contrast, the GeForce 9400M is an out-and-out powerhouse. Quake 4 does stutter at points -- particularly those with several characters onscreen in complex indoor environments -- but holds much closer and sometimes surpasses the 30 frames per second mark with medium-level detail that would crush the Intel video. Unreal Tournament 2004 also runs much more quickly; we never once saw the frame rate dip below 30 frames per second even at the 13" screen's maximum 1280x800, and in-play speed was often significantly higher.
Excluding gameplay, the video speed is also noticeably improved just in general tasks. The previous-generation MacBook would frequently drop a few frames during Dashboard or Expose transitions, especially in heavy use. On the aluminum system's 9400M, those drops never occur. We can also vouch for reduced CPU usage during QuickTime movies thanks to the 9400M's hardware acceleration. When playing a 1080p trailer from Apple's website, processor usage never climbed above 28.6 percent in Activity Monitor where it would at times climb much higher on the earlier MacBook, often hovering between 70 and 90 percent.
I can't belive people are still recommending the plastic macbook over the new one
pros, Courtesy of AppleInsider:
Dramatically improved build quality
Major upgrade to video performance
Noticeably better LCD
multi-touch trackpad
Good battery life
Runs cooler
Regarding the video, Courtesy of AppleInsider
Even light gaming is fine on the previous gen.. I agree if a person wants to do some medium to heavy gaming then buy the alu Macbook. However if they really do a lot of gaming then the Macbook Pro is the way to go.
There is no way in hell the aluminum macbooks can handle heavy computer gaming. Number 1) Laptops aren't made for heavy gaming. Number 2) The MacBook is a midrange laptop with an average laptop card. Number 3) Let's see the Aluminum macbook play games like Crysis, CoD, etc. with high settings running at atleast 1920x1200.
Will I notice the fsb and ram speed differences