Have a look at the paper I linked to above. This technology is relatively new, and as yet, we aren't clear on how Apple will present it, in a wearable. Yeah, sure there is many legal patents to navigate, and the arduous process of navigating FDA requirements, but as was stated, it does appear that the hardware used to provide the current technologies, is suffice for this. Many companies investing in this space, over the last few years, have made acquisitions; such as Garmin with First Beat, to facilitate the software technology they incorporate into their devices. Again, as I said above, I see Apple choosing to provide a feature, that indicates an issue, creating the feedback look to seek medical advice, rather than a reading, that the user simply records, amongst other health metrics.I know PPG, thanks. But to say the hardware, sensors and beyond, is „exactly the same“, gave the impression you had intricate knowledge of the HiLo device; apparently not.
But let‘s speculate that, if the needed tech is already inside the Watch, why would Apple not have implemented blood pressure reading already? I mean, it would be a great way to sell new Watches. Software patents (like that Masimo conundrum)? Measurements not precise enough for Apple standards?