At the very least the FaceTime cameras should be equal to the cameras on the back of the iPhone 12. We really need upgraded camera quality, especially now that everyone is working from home.
Not a huge deal, but makes no sense to me. I can't imagine why it is so difficult to get the same technology that has been around for 3 years now into their iMac. I do always appreciate Apple not throwing something in that is half baked, but this seems like something that should have been worked out a long time ago.
Uh....greed?Not a huge deal, but makes no sense to me. I can't imagine why it is so difficult to get the same technology that has been around for 3 years now into their iMac. I do always appreciate Apple not throwing something in that is half baked, but this seems like something that should have been worked out a long time ago.
I find it humorous when people assume that the world's largest company somehow overlooked something that they point out.Not a huge deal, but makes no sense to me. I can't imagine why it is so difficult to get the same technology that has been around for 3 years now into their iMac. I do always appreciate Apple not throwing something in that is half baked, but this seems like something that should have been worked out a long time ago.
Not saying they overlooked it, but obviously it's a bad look that the largest company in the world can't get this tech into an iMac in 3-4 years time.I find it humorous when people assume that the world's largest company somehow overlooked something that they point out.
I do agree with most of what you said but couldn’t Touch ID be built in to the power button?...
FaceID would work the best in an iMac because it is always in the proper position and has no ability to receive Touch ID.
...
"everyone".At the very least the FaceTime cameras should be equal to the cameras on the back of the iPhone 12. We really need upgraded camera quality, especially now that everyone is working from home.
Indeed. There is no excuse for low quality FaceTime cameras now that everyone is working from home."everyone".
Highways are stacked full. Strange!
Cellular connectivity in Macs never seemed to make a lot of sense to me. Surely this would only be useful to people who... don’t have phones? Who’s going to pay extra for a second SIM card for their Mac when they can just tether off their phone?
Face ID, on the other hand, is an absolute no brainier in Macs. I can only assume the delay is due to technical and/or cost issues.
After all, a user typically sits further away from a Mac screen than from a phone screen. So I guess the sensor from the iPhone can’t just be reused in Macs.
Does Face ID make sense on a computer? There are times when I just sit in front of my computer, I don’t want it to unlock. TouchID seems to make more sense, although on the iMac, it’s probably hard to build TouchID on the magic keyboard.
It does make sense. Windows has had facial login for a few years. It very convenient not having to type your password, especially if your computer sits idle often and locks. BUT, on some laptops I've owned, the facial recognition happens SO FAST, it's annoying. It's annoying because I want to log in as a different user and I have to cover the camera during startup so that I can choose a different user!Does Face ID make sense on a computer? There are times when I just sit in front of my computer, I don’t want it to unlock. TouchID seems to make more sense, although on the iMac, it’s probably hard to build TouchID on the magic keyboard.