Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Whoa! Is that a SCSI port or a parallel port? They're exactly the same external format.

I remember because way back when Mac's had SCSI ports I had a customer bring in a machine with the complaint that it wouldn't print. I check it out. No issues. Customer took the machine back and complained the printer port still didn't work. Checked it again; no issues again. 3rd time I when on site to troubleshoot the problem. Found it, y'all. Most common problem I encountered back in the day: the dread PEBCAK. They had a printer (parallel port) connected to SCSI port on the Mac. I talked the boss into waiving the on-site fee.

Anyhow, I wouldn't mind if they started making the MacBook a bit thicker. I don't care if it adds a pound or two. I'm from the era when a portable computer weighed 35lbs and a laptop weighed 7lbs. If people who complain that a 4-5lbs computer is heavy, it wouldn't hurt to hit the gym every now and then.😘
I have voiced similar sentiment, but doubt we will see much, if any, increase in footprint. Most reviews and consumers complain about anything weighing more than a paperback "adding up over a day".
 
Nope the coincidence is the shift to Apple Silicon which no longer allows them to have 4 TB ports.
You are confusing M1 and Apple Silicon.

M1 only supports 2. The chip in these new machines will support more, as well as more RAM. It will also support a separate GPU die (same package), and have a bigger cache. Also may have more CPU cores, but that part isn’t clear.
 
Moving to Apple Silicon has created greater levels of integration and efficiencies, and... more unused space. Likely even more so with the generation that follows the M1. The result being room for more ports, including an SD reader.

A win for all having both a thin design and more ports. However...those still jonesing for the old days wanting SCSI and Centronix will be disappointed.
 
Is it a coincidence that Jonny Ive is no longer in charge of design at Apple and useful ports suddenly start returning?
Useful ports? The vast majority of users rarely use any other port other than USB. I have never used in my life the SD card slot in any laptop or desktop computer. Apple knows that only tiny fraction of users actually can benefit from this addition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adib
A profound sense of joy is consuming me. Nearly a decade of waiting for common sense to make a return to the MacBook Pro line. I can hardly wait. :apple:
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
SD still has a life for at least 5 years. Camera manufacturers are being very slow to go all in on CFExpress, and even when they do they keep an SD card as the second slot. And this isn't even getting into the consumer grade cameras or micro SD devices

Yeah but what side SD? I mean if people want micro-SD and it's a full sized slot they need to bring adapters...or wait we're back to adapters again!

I just don't see the point in creating single use ports when you have a Thunderbolt 3 port that can literally do everything and better. You can get the card reader of your choice and it can run faster than a built in one, with more features and better options.

I also find it odd just catering for photographers. I know photographers love special options just for them but what about the rest of us?

To be fair I wish you could just choose what ports you could have i'd have 6x TB3/USB4 ports and be done with it - if there was full bandwidth on all of them it'd be an absolute beast of a machine.
 
I think this is just to make up for fact their Apple Silicon SoC only has one thunderbolt controller.. To keep you from tying up limited thunderbolt ports with the common low bandwith accessories people often use.

If I had four thunderbolt ports, I still have ports to spare if one of them is tied up with an SD card reader.

It has two controllers though - one for each port, which is more than the Intel MacBook Pro/Air had.
 
it’s
Why bring back an obsolete slot? We are on CFExpress A and B now, with SD Express coming to fight CFExpress A. SD is dead.
its cheaper to bring back old technology and sugar coat it with an extra £200 / $200 for the privilege. Aka expect a price bump next year to make apple more profits.
 
Curious if the power savings of the new chips allows Apple to finally able to reduce battery size by just the smallest amount to fill in these ports again. Excited to see them adding back some of the ports creatives want in their day-to-day laptop.

"Creatives" don't say creatives when you mean just photographers. Music producers don't need this, music engineers don't need this, artists don't need this, writers don't need this, composers don't need this, designers don't need this, coders don't need this.
 
Why bring back an obsolete slot? We are on CFExpress A and B now, with SD Express coming to fight CFExpress A. SD is dead.
I get the sentiment but the Sony a7S III is still relatively new and there’s millions of photographers who have no intention of upgrading their camera body any time soon. I can see being on my A7 III for at least 5 more years and I know that I’m not alone. So a new mediaformat, albeit superior is not enough to get a whole industry to swap out gear if the prior one is working just fine for now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Canon 1DXiii uses CF Express as does the Nikon D6. Even the semi pro Nikon Z6 to Z7ii, and Canon R5 use CF Express.
At best, it'll be a combo slot that takes both CF Express type A and SD cards. Note that type A is slightly smaller than SD cards, while type B is slightly larger.

WFy89hJ.png


DPReview: In addition to supporting two high-speed UHS-II-compatible SD card slots, the A7S II's card slots are also compatible with the higher-performance CFexpress Type A card standard.

ZPR-sony-a7s-iii-cardSlots.jpg



I doubt Mark Gurman is intimately aware of the format wars happening in high-end DSLR / mirrorless cameras.

Type B is a stretch, IMO, but I'd love to see that future-proofing in a MacBook Pro.
 
Nope the coincidence is the shift to Apple Silicon which no longer allows them to have 4 TB ports.
Can you share with us how you know that the M1X, M2 (whatever it will be called) that will be in this year's 14" and 16" MBP will not be able to have 4 Thunderbolt 4 ports?

How do you know the IO limitations of a SOC that has yet to be announced?
 
So sad that this makes me very excited. Take something away, then make me happy when they give me small things back. It is like an abusive relationship.
The fact you need an SD card reader in your laptop is sad. Get with 2021
 
  • Love
Reactions: dannys1
Skip the USB-A; add HDMI & card slot.

Also Gurman said in a previous report that the new MacBook Pro models would launch around the middle of the year. A little closer than the third quarter range. Here's hoping WWDC brings the goods.
I have a $33 Anker dongle from Amazon with (3) USB-A, Ethernet, and HDMI. Solves all problems. For those only wanting USB-A there are plenty of inline adapters that add 1/2" to an existing cable and if the existing cable is removable you can buy one with a USB-C end on it.
 
With all the TV/Movie reboots, just reboot the 2015 MBPr - it's what I still use to this day because I like muh ports!

And while they're at it, add an m2 slot. What I miss most is how easily upgradable and versatile the 2012 MBP was. (longshot, i know)
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: dannys1
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.