Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What other devices can play the Apple movies right now? Can I buy something from another company to use as a media center and play the Apple file. Will Apple allow files purchased from another company like for example Amazon to play on their player?
Yes to all of the above, except if there is DRM on the file.
And as to other ways to watch an non DRM file? Anything that plays standard video files.
What type of file do you think is on your Bluray disc?
I have a shocking bit of news... you're BR player IS a computer. Just a very limited one.
 
You're not kidding... unwatchable.
So why not buy a ATV instead of a computer (or BD player)
and get:
HD movie rentals (cheaper than buying!)
HD TV show purchases (soon to be DRM free!)
Free HD teasers and trailers
Your entire music library at your fingertips
The latest HD music vidoes
Youtube
Your photo library
All with HDMI single cord hookup
1080P is coming as well!
Or you can get a BD player and watch the same 10 movies over and over:eek:

I guess you miss one thing.. I own a PS3 that can play blu-ray and DVD and a Xbox360 that can play DVD (also have add-on HD DVD). So there no point in buying a ATV... I also have friends that also own PS3... So I can rent or buy a blu-ray movie and then I can take it to my friends so they can watch the movie too..

But what about people that live 30 or 50 miles outside city limits where there is no high speed internet.. Where are them people going to get there HD movies from? That right from Blu-ray or what ever is the next disc type.. And yes there are people still out there that only have dail-up or do not have any internet at all. So disc for movies will always be there..
 
I guess you mess one thing.. I own a PS3 that can play blu-ray and DVD and a Xbox360 that can play DVD (also have add-on HD DVD). So there no point in buying a ATV... I also have friends that also own PS3... So I can rent or buy a blu-ray movie and then I can take it to my friends so they can watch the movie too..

But what about people that live 30 or 50 miles outside city limits where there is no high speed internet.. Where are them people going to get there HD movies from? That right from Blu-ray or what ever is the next disc type.. And yes there are people still out there that only have dail-up or do not have any internet at all. So disc for movies will always be there..
Unless you missed your favorite tv show and want to see it in HD.
Or you want to rent a movie instead of own it.

I also have a PS3 and the BR player in it is state of the art.
Hang on to that unit. When BD dies there will still be a niche for video/audiophiles and the PS3 is a one of a kind unit.
And you can rent HD movies at the PS store.....
Great Media Center, very sophisticated little computer
 
Yes to all of the above, except if there is DRM on the file.
And as to other ways to watch an non DRM file? Anything that plays standard video files.
What type of file do you think is on your Bluray disc?
I have a shocking bit of news... you're BR player IS a computer. Just a very limited one.

It's a bit funny to think that the the majority of the major studios went with BD over HD DVD because it provided superior DRM and now you claim they are ready to get rid of DRM. You might be right, but it is just funny that they are changing their position so quickly.

I know my BR player is a mini computer even my car's Sync system is powered by a small Freescale computer. Computers are all around us.

I also wonder how many people are ready right now to go to a 100% download solution and if not how long it is going to take. Heck we have to keep moving the stupid Digital TV transition deadline date up because millions are not ready. I think digital downloads and BD's can survive side by side just like CD's have with digital music. The market share will slowly shift, but it will take years before all discs are pulled from the rack at the store. How about all of those DVD's and BD's that people already own. Are we expected to throw them away and repurchase a digital file or are they going to make it completely hassle free to copy them to our HDD?

There are a lot of questions to be answered and until then I am still going to rent, purchase and enjoy Blu-ray which is right now the very best that you can buy.
 
Unless you missed your favorite tv show and want to see it in HD.
Or you want to rent a movie instead of own it.

I also have a PS3 and the BR player in it is state of the art.
Hang on to that unit. When BD dies there will still be a niche for video/audiophiles and the PS3 is a one of a kind unit.
And you can rent HD movies at the PS store.....
Great Media Center, very sophisticated little computer


Like I said it great for people like us that have High Speed internet. But there are still a lot of places that do not have or carry High Speed Internet.. You be luck to even get dial up.. So online for them is not a choice they have when it comes to downloaded movies.. Blu-ray will be the only way for them to get HD movies.. Also I wait for reruns of my favorite Tv show in HD (That what a DVR is for) and it is free without needed to download..


P.S. I know people that still use dial up even tho they can get high speed internet. Why they do not have high speed internet is because they do not want to pay a high price for it, but would on a HDTV....
 
Like I said it great for people like us that have High Speed internet. But there are still a lot of places that do not have or carry High Speed Internet.. You be luck to even get dial up.. So online for them is not a choice they have when it comes to downloaded movies.. Blu-ray will be the only way for them to get HD movies.. Also I wait for reruns of my favorite Tv show in HD and it is free without needed to download..

Well anyone can get Wild Blue but it is still only at 1.5 Mbps download. I assume that speeds of satellite Internet will improve as time goes on, but it is going to be a slow process.

It is easy for people in cities and towns to forget that millions of people still live in the rural areas.
 
Well anyone can get Wild Blue but it is still only at 1.5 Mbps download. I assume that speeds of satellite Internet will improve as time goes on, but it is going to be a slow process.

It is easy for people in cities and towns to forget that millions of people still live in the rural areas.

Also the last time I check ( I use Directv for HDTV) it also cost a lot just to get the sat needed to get internet and it is not cheap either for that 1.5 Mbps.. It been like that for 5 years now and has not change much..

Yea $79.99 a month for 1.5 plus only get 17000 MB download a mouth. Not good for any type of movies downloading..
 
Is there currently anything out there like HandBrake that CAN rip BluRay discs??? And is there any software out there yet that can author BluRay discs? I don't just mean as data, but full on authoring like DVD Studio Pro with menus and functionality and everything.

Anybody have insight? I'd appreciate it. Thanks :)
 
I'd take this whole situation further then just not needing a computer or taking your discs to play at a friends house. I think it also comes down to being free to purchase that content from any vendor of your choice. Sometimes Walmart is having a sale, sometimes Amazon or Best Buy is. You can also purchased used discs at a Pawn Shop or eBay. You are not locked into one place for your purchases. You also have choices on your rentals, Netflix, Blockbuster, Mom and Pop video rental, etc. Once you have your movies, BD is a standardized format and you can go purchase the player of your choice. You might have a PS 3 and your buddy might have a Panasonic. Guess what? It is still just going to work.

With the Apple TV, it's Apple or nothing. You are at the mercy of Apple for the content and for the playback of that content. You don't have any choices. You might argue that Sony offers a similar service on their PS3 or Microsoft on their xBox 360, but once again you are locked into their service.

If they come up with a way to download standardized digital files and find an easy and fast way to transfer those files to any device of your choosing regardless of brand, then fine, lets go 100% download. Until then I like having choices in where I purchase my content and on what devices I play it on.

EDIT: I also wanted to add one more thing. When I no longer want a movie I can sell that movie on eBay or to a friend. How exactly to you sell a file? How do you prove that with copyright restrictions and how would you be able to release the DRM so someone else could own that file? Just something else that I like about physical media.

Precisely. Apple would very much like to be that one source you are locked into if we do try to go all-download. Competition is healthy, and competition keeps prices from sky-rocketing just because they can. And with the current method of god-awful DRM, I will never consider downloads for my movies. For specifically the reason of being able to take the movie wherever and play it in whatever I please. That, and I lack some of the moral scruples that most people here have about copying DVD's, whether I own them or not... :D
 
Is there currently anything out there like HandBrake that CAN rip BluRay discs??? And is there any software out there yet that can author BluRay discs? I don't just mean as data, but full on authoring like DVD Studio Pro with menus and functionality and everything.

Anybody have insight? I'd appreciate it. Thanks :)

That is part of why the studios got behind Blu-Ray, because the DRM is so much harder to crack, so that they can actually bend you over that many more times for each and every device that you want to play the movie that YOU OWN on.

Isn't the idea behind entertainment like this to entertain you? Where are the days when the content was produced for the enjoyment of the consumer, and not to line the already disgustingly wealthy pockets of the 3-4 über-corporations in charge of the overwhelming majority of entertainment? lol long gone, that's where :rolleyes:

[EDIT] And no, sorry, I'm not sure when something like that will come out. I think it already exists (maybe?) in the PC world, but with Apple's obvious lack of support there is little mass market to make such an update / application for...
 
Is there currently anything out there like HandBrake that CAN rip BluRay discs??? And is there any software out there yet that can author BluRay discs? I don't just mean as data, but full on authoring like DVD Studio Pro with menus and functionality and everything.

Anybody have insight? I'd appreciate it. Thanks :)
Supposedly SlySoft has done it.
 
Gullible? Yeah right. Gullible is paying good money to own a lower quality product (audio and video) for the sake of convenience.

Don't forget about expense too. And what defines lower quality? Look at the post awhile back that shows the actual differences. They're not as great as people like you would want us to believe. The point is there exists a point of diminishing returns as well as convenience issues (including the time it takes for a BD movie to finally start, whether it will override your machine to force you to watch ads, etc.) and of course the high price of the discs themselves.

The future is clearly heading towards download/stream and store on large hard drives (which are getting larger every day). The best move I ever made was to encode all my DVDs to M4V to play off AppleTV. No more FBI warnings, slow menus, ad overrides, stupid blocks to change audio tracks during the film, etc. I just get easy access to the movie including multiple soundtracks. Handbrake at high quality is nearly identical to the DVD. That solves it for my DVDs. It's only a matter of time before the equivalent of Blu-Ray is available without the discs (which I don't really want in the long run. Who wants a lousy jukebox player (is there one for BD yet?) when you can have unlimited (if you have enough hard drive space) storage of ALL media on a single server that can serve the entire house? THAT is why the future is NOT a disc format. A disc is OK for some distribution and archival purposes, but I want my movies on a server for easy access and transfer to mobile devices, etc. Why should we have to be limited any longer? I can get a 16GB USB flash drive the size of my thumbnail now! In a few years, that will likely be 200GB. Who needs giant discs anymore....

Gullible is paying for a product with missing features (outtakes, commentary, behind-the-scenes).

That's not gullible. It's simply a different set of priorities. Some of us couldn't care less about watching retarded outtakes and behind-the-scen GARBAGE. Yes, it's garbage because it's a waste of time. If I wanted to watch producer crap, I'd be a producer. Let them bring me the final product so I can view it, not watch them put it together (yawn). I COULD have transferred extras over when I encoded my DVDs. The only extra I included was the commentary tracks and I doubt I will even ever use those. I've got better things to do with my time than spend 2 hours listening to a bunch of old dudes making boring comments on why they used this wide lens on this shot and how Jackie Chan kept flubbing his English lines up all the time. Thanks, but no thanks. Give me a lower price and flexibility to watch the movie on my mobile devices and I'm good, thanks.

Gullible is thinking that downloads are convenient. You can't take that download and play it wherever like you can with physical media.

Quite the contrary, I'm afraid. Try to get your BD disc onto your iPod Touch, for example. Try to transfer it to your laptop to carry with you 200 movies (do you really want to carry 200 DVDs onto an airplane? Really???). Your idea of portable clearly lacks imagination. It's MORE portable when it's on your hard drive than on some plastic drink coaster. I can fit a dozen DVDs onto a USB flash drive the size of my thumbnail! You'd rather carry 12 DVDs and maybe their cases too? Have fun with that.

And last I checked, Blu-ray is available as an option from every other PC manufacturer. Nobody is forcing you to buy it. On the flipside, Apple is trying to force you to iTunes since they won't give you the option of Blu-ray. Only ignorant people give up freedom of choice for convenience.

I don't get your insulting language except to figure you are trolling. If I want Blu-Ray, I can buy a stand-alone Blu-Ray player or even a PS3. Why does it have to be on my Apple laptop in order to not get someone like yourself to label me as ignorant? I'm not going to use my laptop to watch BD movies. There's no point to it. The screen is small and I've got better things to do with a $2k laptop than use it for movie time anyway. That's what a BD player is for and it belongs in my home theater room not in my den.

I'd prefer it be dumped onto a server hard drive. Actually, it's possible to do that now, but the software is PC only for the moment. Actually, come to think of it, I can run Windows on my Intel Macs so that wouldn't be an issue either with an external BD drive. I'm sure a native Mac solution will eventually present itself (online 'solutions' already exist, of course).

How can you compare two screenshots from a non calibrated source?
The colors and black levels are not set the same.
And the ATV actually looks better here. Look at the tree on the left.
I'm sure if they were calibrated to match the BD would be better, but these pics prove nothing.

So you need accurate color rendition in order to prove encoding distortions or lack of detail/resolution differences? Give me a freaking break. You are just making up excuses for the fact BD isn't the end-all be-all GARGANTUAN difference certain people in this thread claim it to be.

Okay, let's assume that with the next Apple TV update that we'll be able to buy and rent 1080p movies in iTunes. You will not need a computer for them.

You do not need a computer for current digitally-bought movies.

I see we have yet another genius in the house. WTF do you think a BD player is internally? Let me clue you in. It's not a toaster! You're splitting hairs if you think a disc driven BD player or PS3 is really any different from an AppleTV. No, you seem make trivial naming differences where none exist. Go buy a popcorn A110 if that makes you feel better. It'll play the same M4V encodes that my AppleTV will play as will a PS3. All of them can play the movie files over the network. And that latter fact is what separates the future from the past. Physical discs are simply a storage medium. I don't care if you download or encode, the movie is still just digital DATA and the data is all that matters, not the distribution format. Get over it. Physical media is on its last leg when you can get 32GB onto a format the size of my thumbnail! Give it another year and that will be 64GB (more than BD). Two years from that and that 64GB micro card will be under $10. Why would ANYONE want to be using GIANT plastic platters two years from now? That's what you are buying today! Have fun encoding THEM also two years from now and the rest of us will tell you we told you so!
 
It's amazing how the ever defensive mac crowd want to desperately believe that Apple are the ONLY company doing things right :rolleyes:

Can someone tell me what do you do when all your iTunes downloaded movies vanish because your hdd has given up the ghost? or you lost that backup disk at the same time as your main hdd, or because apple think in it's wisdom you don't need firewire but your purchased movies are on a firewire hdd?

They are a gimmick and won't ever replace a good solid medium and that future is BluRay.

I'm from the UK and a recent study put our average broadband speeds at 2mbps and I know places that can't even get that. (I know some guy on here was touting his 50mbps Virgin connection but that's in selected areas with no AUP applied yet, just wait until everyone is on it and the UBR's become saturated) :p Even BT say with 21cn (Converting to Fibre) it's not going to improve things for the end-user. (see http://www.switchedonuk.org/home/when/)

And what are you supposed to do when sat in a hotel room with no internet connection, with BluRay can either rip them before hand or pop them into your drive while your there.
 
That all great for us that have high speed internet.. But what about people that live 30 or 50 miles outside city limits where there is no high speed internet.. Where are them people going to get there HD movies from? That right from Blu-ray or what ever is the next disc type.. And yes there are people still out there that only have dail-up or do not have any internet at all. So disc for movies will always be there..

Move to a city.:D
 
Don't forget about expense too. And what defines lower quality? Look at the post awhile back that shows the actual differences. They're not as great as people like you would want us to believe. The point is there exists a point of diminishing returns as well as convenience issues (including the time it takes for a BD movie to finally start, whether it will override your machine to force you to watch ads, etc.) and of course the high price of the discs themselves.

The future is clearly heading towards download/stream and store on large hard drives (which are getting larger every day). The best move I ever made was to encode all my DVDs to M4V to play off AppleTV. No more FBI warnings, slow menus, ad overrides, stupid blocks to change audio tracks during the film, etc. I just get easy access to the movie including multiple soundtracks. Handbrake at high quality is nearly identical to the DVD. That solves it for my DVDs. It's only a matter of time before the equivalent of Blu-Ray is available without the discs (which I don't really want in the long run. Who wants a lousy jukebox player (is there one for BD yet?) when you can have unlimited (if you have enough hard drive space) storage of ALL media on a single server that can serve the entire house? THAT is why the future is NOT a disc format. A disc is OK for some distribution and archival purposes, but I want my movies on a server for easy access and transfer to mobile devices, etc. Why should we have to be limited any longer? I can get a 16GB USB flash drive the size of my thumbnail now! In a few years, that will likely be 200GB. Who needs giant discs anymore....



That's not gullible. It's simply a different set of priorities. Some of us couldn't care less about watching retarded outtakes and behind-the-scen GARBAGE. Yes, it's garbage because it's a waste of time. If I wanted to watch producer crap, I'd be a producer. Let them bring me the final product so I can view it, not watch them put it together (yawn). I COULD have transferred extras over when I encoded my DVDs. The only extra I included was the commentary tracks and I doubt I will even ever use those. I've got better things to do with my time than spend 2 hours listening to a bunch of old dudes making boring comments on why they used this wide lens on this shot and how Jackie Chan kept flubbing his English lines up all the time. Thanks, but no thanks. Give me a lower price and flexibility to watch the movie on my mobile devices and I'm good, thanks.



Quite the contrary, I'm afraid. Try to get your BD disc onto your iPod Touch, for example. Try to transfer it to your laptop to carry with you 200 movies (do you really want to carry 200 DVDs onto an airplane? Really???). Your idea of portable clearly lacks imagination. It's MORE portable when it's on your hard drive than on some plastic drink coaster. I can fit a dozen DVDs onto a USB flash drive the size of my thumbnail! You'd rather carry 12 DVDs and maybe their cases too? Have fun with that.



I don't get your insulting language except to figure you are trolling. If I want Blu-Ray, I can buy a stand-alone Blu-Ray player or even a PS3. Why does it have to be on my Apple laptop in order to not get someone like yourself to label me as ignorant? I'm not going to use my laptop to watch BD movies. There's no point to it. The screen is small and I've got better things to do with a $2k laptop than use it for movie time anyway. That's what a BD player is for and it belongs in my home theater room not in my den.

I'd prefer it be dumped onto a server hard drive. Actually, it's possible to do that now, but the software is PC only for the moment. Actually, come to think of it, I can run Windows on my Intel Macs so that wouldn't be an issue either with an external BD drive. I'm sure a native Mac solution will eventually present itself (online 'solutions' already exist, of course).



So you need accurate color rendition in order to prove encoding distortions or lack of detail/resolution differences? Give me a freaking break. You are just making up excuses for the fact BD isn't the end-all be-all GARGANTUAN difference certain people in this thread claim it to be.



I see we have yet another genius in the house. WTF do you think a BD player is internally? Let me clue you in. It's not a toaster! You're splitting hairs if you think a disc driven BD player or PS3 is really any different from an AppleTV. No, you seem make trivial naming differences where none exist. Go buy a popcorn A110 if that makes you feel better. It'll play the same M4V encodes that my AppleTV will play as will a PS3. All of them can play the movie files over the network. And that latter fact is what separates the future from the past. Physical discs are simply a storage medium. I don't care if you download or encode, the movie is still just digital DATA and the data is all that matters, not the distribution format. Get over it. Physical media is on its last leg when you can get 32GB onto a format the size of my thumbnail! Give it another year and that will be 64GB (more than BD). Two years from that and that 64GB micro card will be under $10. Why would ANYONE want to be using GIANT plastic platters two years from now? That's what you are buying today! Have fun encoding THEM also two years from now and the rest of us will tell you we told you so!

Man you have no clue... A USB thumb-drive at 64GB is $139.99 compared to 2 pack of 50GB BD-R for $34.99... When the price drops on the 64Gb thumb-drive so will the BD-R.. Disc will always be cheaper then a flash memory and last longer too... Also Physical discs will stay around because there are millions of people that still do not have high speed internet.. Maybe if you drive out to a small town of less then a 1000 and I bet they have no high speed internet..
 
Move to a city.:D

Who said that I did not live in a city? No where in any of my posted did I said I lived outside of city limits or out in the middle of no where.. I have a ISP that has a 250GB cap on bandwidth and have no other choice other then DSL or dial up, Plus blu-ray is better..
 
Physical media is on its last leg when you can get 32GB onto a format the size of my thumbnail! Give it another year and that will be 64GB (more than BD). Two years from that and that 64GB micro card will be under $10. Why would ANYONE want to be using GIANT plastic platters two years from now? That's what you are buying today! Have fun encoding THEM also two years from now and the rest of us will tell you we told you so!

We'll see about all of this happening in 2 years. The industry has just made a move into Blu-ray and invested a lot of money. They want some return on those investments and is the consumer is adopting BD at a faster rate then DVD was adopted.

I won't have any issue buying a new BD player or movies for it in two years. Want to take a bet?

As far as memory sticks being cheaper in 2 years, sure, but by then producing a BD disc in volume will probably cost a couple dollars per disc or less. DVD's used to be expensive to produce. It costs less then $1 to make a DVD today.

By the way, A DVD or BD is NOT GIANT like you are trying to say. The Laser Disc was GIANT.

I love it around here. You either have to be 100% in agreement with Apple or your against them. I like Apple, but I think they should offer a BD drive in their computers. They already have the drive in them why not make it more capable? If you hate discs then don't use the disc drive and throw them away.
 
Havent's they switched to h.264? Are they in their right minds...

There used to exist comparisons back in the days of HDDVD vs Blu-ray discussions. They showed lists of movies with side by side comparisons showing details of each movie and what it was encoded with and the bit rate along with screen shots.

I can't find any of those sites any more. I was hoping to provide a link that showed all the movies and what compression was used to encode the movie. But I recall all of them using MPEG2 or VC-1 (microsoft's codec).

I don't know the latest, but I saw an article from back in 2005 stating that VC-1 beat out both MPEG2 and H.264 while MPEG2 beat out H.264. I couldn't find anything recent on the net about blu-ray and compression codec on the discs.

I did also find a bunch of Blu-ray authorizing companies complaining about the lack of H.264 documentation so they were just going with MPEG2 because there were default presets to encode at 20mbits/s or 40mbits/s with no real clear defaults to encode with H.264. Nobody ever got fired for doing what everyone else is doing...

Anyone have any insight to this topic?
 
Wow it seems like every thread regarding Blu-ray on MacRumors always
incites passionate debate (and some insults) on both camps. While I, myself, am pro Blu-ray, I can understand the other side. My personal view is that eventually (I'm not going to state a timeframe) downloading will be the norm and will supplant physical media. We have no idea what future technology is going to come to pass. But my guess is that downloading as we know it is going to go through some revolutionary change and that change will allow physical media to become a dying breed.

However, in the meantime, I am enjoying my HDTV, Blu-ray player, and Blu-ray discs. I've found my movie-watching to be quite enjoyable on my new equipment. I've greatly enjoyed the 6 James Bond films that were released onto Blu-ray back in October 2008 and am looking forward to all the future releases of the rest of the Bond films. When they get released (some sooner than others), I am looking forward to watching the Star Wars films, the Star Trek films, the Lord of the Rings films, the Indiana Jones films, Jurassic Park, and any other film that can take advantage of the Blu-ray format.

As I believe that Blu-ray is still the only option right now to be able to watch movies at their highest quality in PQ and AQ, I am happy with my investment in the technology and have no regrets about buying it...even if it will become obsolete or people say that Blu-ray is "stupid" or "borndead" or whatever else. I'll even agree with you. But I'll also enjoy watching my movies in their 1080p glory, which I can do right now.
 
The CDs and DVDs in our house already take up too much space, 2 wardrobes to be precise so I certainly don't want any more disks. Give me DRM free downloads, if only.

I think your personal experience is a prime example of market place economics. That being: In a consumer economy, there is something to be sold by and to everyone from whom money can be acquired. That being said, I personally like my media library of physical content that include: a cylinder phonograph (I inherited from my great aunt), LPs, Reel-to-Reel, CD, Cassette Tape, 8-Trac Cassette, UMD, Laser Disc, HD-DVD, DVD, VHS, Beta, and Blu-Ray. I admit, I am a Technophile but I think there's something to be said for physical media. Being able to show a box, a sleeve containing an LP, and giving the history and experience behind its acquisition that I personally cannot disassociate from, in terms of experience.

I have an X-Serve and RAID to which I have backed-up my physical media to and from which I stream, within my home, to my computers and TVs. Anyway, space within my home isn't an issue but I respect that not everyone has the space for a large physical library but my biggest gripe with DLC is the DRM... If I DL an HD movie, which is a story in itself, I can't go to my friend's house and watch in his/her home theatre, w/o having to deal with DRM and downconversion. Technology changes all the time, it's neither good nor bad. If anything, the fact that we still have options and can choose by preference is a great thing. :cool:

** Sorry for the novel*** :eek:
 
There used to exist comparisons back in the days of HDDVD vs Blu-ray discussions. They showed lists of movies with side by side comparisons showing details of each movie and what it was encoded with and the bit rate along with screen shots.

I can't find any of those sites any more. I was hoping to provide a link that showed all the movies and what compression was used to encode the movie. But I recall all of them using MPEG2 or VC-1 (microsoft's codec).

I don't know the latest, but I saw an article from back in 2005 stating that VC-1 beat out both MPEG2 and H.264 while MPEG2 beat out H.264. I couldn't find anything recent on the net about blu-ray and compression codec on the discs.

I did also find a bunch of Blu-ray authorizing companies complaining about the lack of H.264 documentation so they were just going with MPEG2 because there were default presets to encode at 20mbits/s or 40mbits/s with no real clear defaults to encode with H.264. Nobody ever got fired for doing what everyone else is doing...

Anyone have any insight to this topic?

Interesting, which companies were/are those? I've been purchasing BD movies from day one; most of them were MPEG-2, in the beginning. I have 91 Blu-Ray movies and the last 20 recent releases I bought are MPEG4-AVC or VC-1. Example, I have The Bourne Identity and The Matrix (Series) on both HDDVD and Blu-Ray. Bourne and the Matrix on HDDVD were VC-1 and on Blu-Ray they're also VC-1, Universal Studios was HDDVD exclusive and Warner had temporary exclusivity until "that big day". Wall-e (Disney= Blu-Ray exclusive from day 1) and Max Payne were MPEG4 AVC. I have personally found, those film studios that were HDVD exclusive in the early days are using VC-1 but those from the Blu-Ray camp were using MPEG-2 but since late Q3 last year they mostly have been MPEG4. I have yet to have found or have come across a new release since since then that was MPEG2.

FYI. VC-1 is part of the Blu-Ray standard. Either way, standardization of the BD format is a good thing for manufacturers and the consumer. imho
 
That's already happening with Apple.
Apple stands against DRM as witnessed by the scrubbing of it from their
music downloads.
There are many video downloads from iTunes that are playable on any platform that can play standard av files. Media centers, computers, etc.
Much more flexibility not less.
The day will come when all the downloads will be DRM free.
BR only plays BR. Very inflexible and old school.

First: Blu-ray only plays Blu-ray? Are you dense? Blu-ray players play BDs, DVDs, and CDs. Some also have USB ports for various multimedia purposes. A few play streaming video from Netflix. One model streams Pandora radio. Only BD? Geez.

Apple stands for removing DRM, but that doesn't mean the studios do. Guess who controls the content? The only reason the music companies let tracks be DRM-free is people can buy CDs without DRM and rip them a bazillion times. If CDs had DRM like DVDs and BDs, there would be no iTunes Plus.

Another bit of proof that studios love copy protection is how much they're getting into streaming video. That way you can force people to watch ads and there is no way for illegal distribution. With Hulu and Netflix seeming to work so well (I don't want to say "profitable" yet for Hulu), movie and TV studios aren't going to just remove DRM from videos and let people swap them like they did music.

What I beg Apple to do is make a bigger AppleTV box that can be easily customized to use services like Netflix and watch streaming video from network sites. A better remote than the POS Apple Remote would be needed, but such a box would sell in huge quantities if it was under $500.
 
Honestly, I have never faced any situation in which I would say: damn it! I wish I had a Blu-ray disc (or HDDVD for that matter). My LCD TV is not Full-HD, so the difference between playing DVDs and BDs is probably close to nothing. Even if I had a Full-HD TV, given it is 32", I don't know if I would see a great difference (or if this difference would be worth the extra price of the player + BDs). In any case, if you really care about image quality, you won't use your computer to watch movies. You'll probably buy an external player.
I never use DVDs for backups. External hard drives are better for that, and they're better than BDs too. The price per Gb is so low now in external HDs that any other storage format shouldn't be an option.

I understand that content creators need to deliver their creations in BDs sometimes, but I guess that's not the situation for many people. I think, though, that people with these special needs are enriched in the Mac-user community. I think Apple should provide BD drives as an option (I, for example, don't want to pay the extra price for that, cause I don't need it) for professionals or anyone else who wants it.
I think options are always good: matte or glossy screens, BD or DVD drives, etc., you know, all those things that Apple, for obscure reasons, does not want to provide to customers.
 
Just like Tallest Skil would say. No Blu-ray on Macs until 2015.

And Apple will go belly-up in 2011 in that case, and no Blu-ray on Mac because Mac won't exist.

:apple:

I will not buy another mac until they have blu ray drives in them and they can play blu ray/AVCHD in real-time.

You and me and at least 150,000 other pro content creators.

:apple:

BluRay WILL fail....in about 6 years when it is over shadowed by non-mechanical data media. BluRay is the last gasp of optical digital media for mass consumption.

That's not failure... that's retirement after a long profitable life for a technology-based product.

:apple:

All these people saying that Blu-ray is dead and that internet-streaming is the future - I hate to alarm you, but there's a big bad world outside of these forums in which people who like to watch quality video don't have computers in their living rooms. Many don't have broadband, and some of them, believe it or nor, don't even own computers :eek:

And at least a couple hundred thousand of us who DO own Apple computers, actually CREATE and DELIVER content for those folks.

On the Windoze side, because Jobs had been too longsighted.

As far as HD-DVD crybabies; get an LG player that plays both.

:apple:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.