You mean I'd be able to charge my Pencil on my mac?![]()
http://www.patentlyapple.com/patent...combinable-virtual-ios-desktops-on-a-mac.htmlYup. Actually you raise a very good point (no pun intended). I think it's generally agreed that iOS and MacOS are going to merge eventually. A Mac that shares iOS touch screen peripherals via Lightning would be useful when Apple finally moves there. Certainly the rumored OLED touch bar is a step in that direction. At a minimum, I could see sharing apps on a MacBook in an iOS shell environment like Classic was to OS X, except it's transitioning the other way, i.e. becoming the primary OS while maintaining 'Classic' OS X compatibility. Imagine a glass top MacBook, where the TouchPad is invisible, and only available for OS X apps. Perhaps even the keys are virtual with taptic feedback. A simple swipe between environments at first and then OS X apps appear in windows, as they are relied upon less and less.
It'll never be as reliable as a cable, no matter what the speed. I have no interest in Bluetooth.
That's the pesky and annoying little problem with new technologies coming on stream. There's always the one latest feature you really want but can't have unless you upgrade once again, at which point the cycle repeats.
You can never really get ahead and stay there unless you constantly upgrade, grrrrr......![]()
Maybe they'll adopt the new aptX HD codec introduced at CES earlier this year...but then again they never adopted standard aptX, so probably unlikely.I was wondering about this... if Apple was going to try to create their own wireless codec or something. Luckily they worked with a standards body. It's weird that they didn't do that for lightening since they basically wrote the USBC spec and are pushing it so much with Macs. I wonder what the decision process was for that.
I never tried to watch videos with sound over bluetooth...And maybe no sound lag when viewing videos?
All the complaints I always read about BT amaze me. Based on the number of negative comments about it, you'd think that it was the worst technology ever created. I have never had issue with connecting to, or staying connected to, BT speakers at home, work, car, friends house, parents house, etc. If I hit the pause button on my phone while listening to music, the music coming out of the BT speaker stops immediately; no noticeable delay. I have noticed some delay when playing games, but I don't play games that have a better experience with a BT speaker, so I just use my phones speaker. I read about people losing the connection if they pick up their phone, or walk 10 feet away, or aren't able to establish a connection in the first place, and I'm just not able to relate or understand. I don't know if there are more variables to some peoples problems than are being mentioned in forums, or I'm just REALLY lucky when it comes to BT.
Not exactly, it is a three way trade off of power, bandwidth and MpW (MIPS per Watt) of the system. Low power computing has consistently become faster as low-power semiconductor processes improve. The Bluetooth SIGs knows this and upgrades the standards to reflect this improved performance. My take is we'll see little increase in power but improvements in BT5. This will mean new silicon just like the upgrade to BT4 / BLE.More bandwidth always requires more power ...
Update: The article title and first paragraph originally stated that Bluetooth 5 would bring quadruple the speed and double the range of the existing protocol, when in fact it promises 2x speed and 4x range.
Bluetooth SIG's PR agency contacted MacRumors to request the correction, owing to a mistake in the original newsletter copy that the SIG's executive director sent out.
Article Link: 'Bluetooth 5' to be Announced Next Week [Update: Bringing 2x Speed, 4x Range]
That was solved in Bluetooth 4.x. Only Bluetooth versions lower than 4 were so limited.
Apple is notoriously slow in giving us what we want, instead we will get 10 USB-C ports, for which we all have 0 devices without a dongle required.I'm hoping we don't have to wait for iPhone 8 for this... Since we're moving into a wireless world more and more every day.
Wireless headphones too. I actually have the B&W p5 wireless, so I am looking forward very much so to Bluetooth 5.All I remember about bluetooth is that in early 2000's with your cellphone you can see others who have their bluetooth on and exchange files with them in any public area.
I think its used for wireless controllers today and maybe personal hotspot?
Any way, if you buy a new standard bluetooth device it will probably mean you have to upgrade all your other gadgets to reap the benefits....
Bose just came out with a pair of $350 wireless headphones. Given that this 5.0 is just around the corner and it requires a hardware upgrade, almost seems like a no brainer to wait...
Bluetooth 5, the next generation of Bluetooth standard, will be formally announced next week, offering quadruple the range and double the speed of the current low-energy wireless protocol.
Executive director of the Bluetooth Special Interest Group, Mark Powell, revealed the news in a published email sent to UK health and monitoring company Blue Maestro. The Bluetooth SIG, which is backed by Apple, Intel, and other major technology companies, will officially make the announcement on June 16 in London.
![]()
The standard's adoption of the title "Bluetooth 5" drops reference to both the version and point number, indicating both a significant revision of the protocol and an effort by SIG to simplify its marketing strategy.
The new standard is also said to offer significantly wider support for smart home devices and enhanced Internet of Things (IoT) functionality, in addition to increased support for location-based connectionless services, such as assistive navigation beacons.
It's unclear whether Bluetooth 5 will come to existing devices as a firmware update or require new hardware, but the latter is more likely. Previously, Bluetooth 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 devices were not upgradeable to newer versions of the standard, but Bluetooth 4.0 devices could be upgraded to Bluetooth 4.1 via software patches.
In October last year, Apple quietly added Bluetooth 4.2 support to the iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, and iPad Air 2, bringing 2.5x faster speeds and up to ten times higher data capacity to the devices.
Rumors of impending upgrades to Apple's MacBook range typically make no mention of wireless protocols, while iPhone 7 leaks and speculation are also usually silent on the subject.
However, given the increasing likelihood that Apple will remove the headphone jack in the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus, Bluetooth will become the primary means of connecting headphones for most users unless wired Lightning earbuds are included in the box.
Update: The article title and first paragraph originally stated that Bluetooth 5 would bring quadruple the speed and double the range of the existing protocol, when in fact it promises 2x speed and 4x range.
Bluetooth SIG's PR agency contacted MacRumors to request the correction, owing to a mistake in the original newsletter copy that the SIG's executive director sent out.
Article Link: 'Bluetooth 5' to be Announced Next Week [Update: Bringing 2x Speed, 4x Range]
Bose just came out with a pair of $350 wireless headphones. Given that this 5.0 is just around the corner and it requires a hardware upgrade, almost seems like a no brainer to wait...
This is very good news, especially as current BT is hamstrung by bandwidth when it comes to music .
Imo the best thing to do until the bluetooth/lightning/ usb c situation becomes more clear. I also want to see what is happening to the USB B/micro charging port on those bluetooth headphones. Currently they are often only used for charging. If you forgot to charge your headphones, most of them are dead (i know some high end models have a 3,5mm fallback/ or Philips had a pair with USB mode for PCs). But if they switch to USB C in the future, they could also implement a chipset, which uses USB C audio for those times you forgot to charge them. This could also allow some gimmicks like noise cancellation and adaptive noise control (e.g. JBL Reflect Aware C). I don't know if Apple is planning something similar with Lightning, but at least for USB C Android phones this could be very convenient.
Current bluetooth 4 is 25 megabits/second = 3 megabytes/second. Uncompressed, lossless, dual channel stereo CD music @ 44.1 kHz/16-bit is just 176 KB/second. Even the Sony high definition audio format only used 3 megabits/second.
Whatever is wrong with current bluetooth, it is absolutely not a bandwidth issue. And if it were, merely doubling the BW couldn't make a fundamental difference.