Yeah, rsync is nowhere near as capable, especially on Big Sur.Beats me why people buy text editors - vi works just as well.
Code compilers? Pah, just use assembly and be done with it.
/s
Yeah, rsync is nowhere near as capable, especially on Big Sur.Beats me why people buy text editors - vi works just as well.
Code compilers? Pah, just use assembly and be done with it.
/s
If it's mounted as a 'drive' in finder, then it can clone there.Can it backup to cloud servers (e.g. Amazon Glacier)? Local back-ups are great, but off-site backups are also essential.
No thanks. If the UI decreases the odds of my effing something up and losing data it's well worth the price. I know just enough Terminal stuff to get into trouble.I’m going to rain on their parade… You can buy this application for $40, or you can spend not even ten minutes learning how to use rsync.
Oh god, yeah. That was a particularly egregious example of software rental. I say "was" because I exported my stuff and trashed the app as soon as the non-rental version stopped working on whatever version of MacOS.This is also not like DayOne, where we are paying annually since 2017 for improvements and innovations such as the ability to text our journals instead of just opening the app and typing in it.
Both are great backup apps and it really seems quite equal: Some like/use CCC more, others SuperDuper. My suggestion would be that you try out both (within the trial period) and then decide which one suits your needs better.How does this compare to SuperDuper?
I don't think it's an either/or. Time Machine is awesome for continuous backup with clear versioning. CCC is great for migrating data or, as I do, making a separate clone (kept offsite!) of everything aside from what's in Time Machine.I use Time Machine, I only use Disk Utility for partitioning, and formatting drives. CCC is good if you want the backup bootable. For me personally, it's not a requirement to be bootable.
Using Disk utility for cloning is like yelling across the street to your neighbor, who may not hear you, even with the window open. Disk Utility doesn't let you know you have been heard much less that you have heard in proper context.I prefer Disk Utility for cloning, it's free, built in and trustworthy. For backup I prefer Time Machine.
There isn't much need for third party software for this functionality, but I guess many people don't understand how to use Disk Utility.
CCC does the same as TM but better, in my opinion.I use Time Machine, I only use Disk Utility for partitioning, and formatting drives. CCC is good if you want the backup bootable. For me personally, it's not a requirement to be bootable.
I’m looking for making incremental backups several times per day similar to how Time Machine does it.Certainly works with a NAS - I do this all the time. Never tried incremental backups - what are you looking for ?
Never used CCC. Can it run incremental backups to a network drive (NAS)?
It's Universal.I'm still unclear if v6 is available as a native ARM download?
Oh god, yeah. That was a particularly egregious example of software rental. I say "was" because I exported my stuff and trashed the app as soon as the non-rental version stopped working on whatever version of MacOS.
I'm using Ulysses. Also a rental app, but I think it brings a lot to the table if you have a lot of other work to use it for. I toyed with using Agenda for this purpose but all my other writing is in Ulysses so I put it there. To be honest, I could just as easily create a Pages document, put each entry on a new page and call it a day (or, a succession of days).Would you mind telling which app are you using to journal, if at all? Classic pen and paper works great, but sometimes I miss the advantages the digital world affords.
TM and CCC do very different things. I use both and they complement each other nicely.CCC does the same as TM but better, in my opinion.