Some of Bose's products stream music via Wifi/internet for things like Radio stations etc.
I am pretty sure that is the type of streaming they are talking about, not setting up a steaming service...
Then why did you buy Beats?
Am I the only one around here who hates streaming and prefers to own the music?
I'm with you for the most part, but used CDs are actually a pretty great deal -- you can rip them any way you want. Hard drives being as cheap as they are, I now rip Lossless and have iTunes send downsampled versions to my phone. Wish I'd had the foresight (and budget) to do that years ago when I originally ripped a few hundred CDs at what now seems like a ludicrously low bitrate :/
Because the Beats had a better sound for the music I like (jazz) than the Bose.
Apple should have purchased Bose. When I think of Apple, I think of Bose (quality product). When I think of Beats by Dre, I think of Android (cheap product). Also, Apple could have used Bose to integrate into the living room with there home theatre systems. BTW, where are the 12 days of Christmas from Apple this year? Guess they did away with that to pay for stupid Beats by Dre.
At this point it'd be easier to report who's NOT working on a streaming music service.
anyone else hate Jazz? After 10 minutes I start going crazy
Then why did you buy Beats?
When I think of Apple, I think of Bose (quality product). When I think of Beats by Dre, I think of Android (cheap product).
Why does every single thing need to be...:
- Owned by Apple
- Sold in an Apple Store
- Wearing the Apple Logo
...to be worthwhile on its own merit?
PS: Bose is just as bad as Beats when it comes to all brand and no substance. I suppose it technically would not have made a difference which one Apple bought out.
They are both not bad. Granted, Beats is expensive for the quality they deliver, but people are also interested in style, brand and what they project when they own these headphones. Everyone has their reasons.
Try some Sennheisers next time. I'm not telling you to buy them, just try them. Any pair.
Audio Technica is a great brand as well, for a fraction of the price.
http://www.amazon.com/Audio-Technica-ATH-M50x-Professional-Monitor-Headphones/dp/B00HVLUR86
For the record, I use a bose soundlink mini speaker and Quietcomfort 15's on flights, busses and subways so I don't have a bias or anything.
Unfortunately, you're a part of a dying breed. I, too, loved purchasing my own music for years, until the price was raised above the psychological upper limit of 99¢ for many songs, and until I got bored of listening to my own music over and over. I prefer streaming now simply for the variety.
Am I the only one around here who hates streaming and prefers to own the music?
Thanks. I'll pick your brain some more, but doing my research I have it down to:
Audio-Technica ATH-M40x (amazon: $100)
Audio-Technica ATH-M50x (amazon: $160)
V-MODA Crossfade LP Over-Ear Noise-Isolating Metal (amazon: $110)
Bose SoundTrue Headphones Around-Ear (amazon $150)
Sennheiser HD 558 (amazon $120)
I'm not sure the difference between the M40x and M50x would be noticeable by her. (I only listen to lectures, so I don't know if I could tell either.) The only reason I saw the V-MODA was because it was Amazon's gold-box deal of the day. I know the Bose is comfortable for her, because I had her try them on.
I've already spent a lot this year, so I'd prefer to lower cost if the difference doesn't justify. She listens to rock mostly, however she also likes to watch horror movies in bed on her laptop. Right now she is using a pair of in ear Sony ear buds, which I would be surprised if she spent more than $20 on. My hope is that better quality headphones would let her keep the volume down and protect her hearing. Of course, if they are not comfortable she wont wear them.
Also, sometimes she wears glasses.
Had those and the QC25 and didn't like them as much as the Beats studio & studio wireless, sound quality wise. I don't buy for appearance or coolness.
Because the Beats had a better sound for the music I like (jazz) than the Bose.
Can't disagree with you, I'm part of that dying breed as well. But as long as I can get CDs and / or used CDs on Amazon for decent prices, I'll continue to be a throwback. It's not just about track price...sound quality is a huge issue yet to be resolved as well on any large level.
----------
Nope, I'm with you. It sucks moving around 500-600 cds around when I relocate, but I'd rather have a tangible album in hand, with real liner notes, and good sound quality hands down over convenience. I know there are ideas in the pipeline to appease people like me, but I'm not holding my breath for the day they come to fruition on any standardized level.
embrace iTunes match, and apple will essentially be storing all those cd's for you