Did you not read the post I left yesterday? Apple are using Class 2 displays on all their product line (same as eeeeevery other computer company). Now yes, the MacBook Pro's are very expensive machines, but they would be a LOT more expensive if Apple were to use Class 1 (ie, dead-pixel free) displays. Apple simply sources LCD panels from manufacturers and asks for Class 2 displays. Those manufacturers will send them panels which meet that specification, some of which will have some dead pixels or stuck pixels (but are within spec according to the class of the panel)
Apple have built the price of the display into the price of the overall product. If you want to demand absolute perfection you're going to need to put your hand in your pocket because the cost of Apple changing to Class 1 displays on the MacBook Pro will be substantial.
We're not saying 'Oh well' just because we like dead pixels (I hate them), but if you've any experience whatsoever with the electronics industry you will know that the consumer level LCD panels are allowed to have a number of dead pixels before the panel can be classed as faulty. It's more about being realistic than anything else.
Saying that, some display manufacturers are offering very good 'zero pixel defect' policies on their displays which is probably more for good customer service / PR, as I'm sure they're incurring a cost. That would be a step in the right direction for Apple. I guess it's like Google offering 7GB+ of storage for Gmail - they advertise such a huge storage space because they realise few people will ever use it. Same with LCD makers - by advertising a 'zero pixel defect' policy they keep everyone happy, hoping that few people will take them up on it (as each return costs them money).
Interesting support document by Apple -
Link - Unfortunately they don't state their policy on how many pixel constitutes a fault, seems to be at their discretion.