Brave is a good browser. I do use it when Safari can't block ads; it's quite effective and I'm happy with it.
I was making around $10-$15 a month in BAT that’s going to turn a lot of users away. It’s still a great browser and the ads are actually ads I want to see without needing to mine my personal data to get. I’ll be using it still to support sites I visit. I throw 3-5 BAT at Macrumors a month and around 10 to Wikipedia. The desktop browser is the best I have used for Mac OS.How is the app destroyed? If it can’t survive unless it is able to violate App Store rules, that doesn’t say much about the app, in my opinion.
A browser supposedly geared towards privacy wanting to pay people to view ads seems rather hypocritical to me.
Research the BAT project it’s literally built around ethical advertising and addresses the issues we currently face. With Brave I looked forward to seeing ads as they were useful and I got 70% of the cut.Brave is supposed to be a privacy browser. The ad rewards program seems antithetical to that aim. Good riddance.
Microsoft Edge?I really like ungoogled-chromium. It is chrome with all the google crap taken out.
That sounds like trading google's crap for Microsoft's crap? lolMicrosoft Edge?
On the surface it might sound almost the same, but it's not.That sounds like trading google's crap for Microsoft's crap? lol
Still the best browser out there. Used Chrome since its beta. Swapped to Firefox because of the privacy concerns that Chrome unfortunately is born with. Chromium is still the best rendering engine out there so gave Brave a go 6 months ago and it's both faster just feels nicer. The BAT tokens are a good idea just not that great executed - but they are still thinking more logically about this than most browsers out there.
Microsoft Edge?
That sounds like trading google's crap for Microsoft's crap? lol
Here it is, love those dislikes I got:I think I heard they inject affiliate links too.
By default you should have no ads: Brave's own ads are off by default and the ad blocker is on by default.I found Brave, on both desktop and mobile, very spammy with its cryptocurrency ads via notifications. Took a dislike to it as a result.
It literally told you when clicking the link it would support the Brave team as an affiliate it wasn't a surprise to anyone who used the browser and could read. In the end a bunch of people who never even used the browser started complaining. Its all open source anyway you can always self audit same as Firefox.Here it is, love those dislikes I got:
![]()
Brave browser CEO apologizes for automatically adding affiliate links to cryptocurrency URLs
The company touts its browser as a privacy-focused option that doesn’t track users.www.theverge.com
![]()
Brave Browser caught adding its own referral codes to some cryptocurrency trading sites
No, Brave is not a privacy browserwww.androidpolice.com
Depends Firefox can be configured for better privacy than Brave but you also create a very unique fingerprint that way (Not talking about the traditional fingerprint both Brave and Firefox randomize for users). I'm getting to the point where I want things just to work and Brave does that though I am jealous of Firefox's support of ESNI etc as well.Would anyone here agree that a config and extension optimized Firefox is a better bet for privacy? (aside from functionality, rendering, etc)