Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Did you even read it?

Yes... pretty much it blames AT&T. However, dropped calls at one point where thought to be iPhone related because it was across the world. Hell, the iPhone was even tested at independent labs to see what was the problem.

So, the iPhone got fame all over of its fail in the phone part (here in the US it's 50/50)
 
Yes... pretty much it blames AT&T. However, dropped calls at one point where thought to be iPhone related because it was across the world. Hell, the iPhone was even tested at independent labs to see what was the problem.

So, the iPhone got fame all over of its fail in the phone part (here in the US it's 50/50)

I can't really blame dropped calls on the iPhone itself, but we have to admit that the quality could be a little bit better. As for battery life... it need a lot of work. Those are the only issues I see with I though, one being a very serious one.
 
Terrible article, but the author does raise some valid points about the iPhone's phone app (the no-ring problem has plagued my phone countless times). There are a lot of things that suck about the phone aspect of the iPhone, no doubt, but there are also a lot of really innovate or very slick features that should be noted. Here are a couple of good things I can think of about the iPhone's phone app:

Visual voicemail is absolutely phenomenal. Just think about how you used to get your voicemail. Another great thing about the iPhone is that it's really easily to merge contacts into calls. I must confess I haven't used this feature much (at all) prior to the iPhone, but the ability to quickly put someone on hold, add another person (or several people) to a conference call is quite nice. It's also nice to be able to use other apps while talking on the phone - great if you're doing a conference call and need to check something.

I think we can all agree that the iPhone was a pretty successful first effort by Apple (incredibly successful). I honestly can't think of another company that stepped into a sector that they really had no practical experience in and had the kind of success that Apple did. That being said, there is always room for improvement - even if we'd like to think the iPhone is the be-all-end-all of everything. :p
 
Don't agree completely with that article, but I agree that phone isn't iPhone best part. IMO it's pretty lousy compared to my previous phones.

What's really funny is this "iPhone is great, let's blame AT&T" mentality. Do you see it a bit weird that AT&T is in any kind of responsibility for the problems in UK iPhones? That was an UK based blog... Could it be that all the operators that sell iPhones are crappy or could it be that iPhone just ain't that good as a phone?
 
Opinions are worth what you paid for them. Calls make up a small percent of what typical iPhone users do while using their phone.

Actually, to make a generalization like that isn't really accurate. People use their iPhones in very unique ways. Data is a big part, but I use quite a few voice minutes too.

That said, CNET UK's generalizations aren't accurate for everyone either. I haven't had any of the problems they've claimed the iPhone is so universally plagued with.

Truth be told, the phone side of the iPhone is a lot like any other phone. Some people love it and have great experiences, and others hate it. We just give more attention to the iPhone because, well it's the iPhone, and everyone assumes that if they don't love the iPhone, it's because it must suck.
 
Actually, to make a generalization like that isn't really accurate. People use their iPhones in very unique ways. Data is a big part, but I use quite a few voice minutes too.

You are making a generalization that people use their iPhone uniquely based on your personal usage of voice minutes.

It has been shown that iPhone users use 10X as much data on average. I did state in my OP, that calls are a small part of use for 'typical' users. There are some who talk on their iPhone a lot. I use over 1,000 minutes per month, which is more than most but by no means a high number. But when you break it down to how often is the phone actually in my hand making a phone call, it is certainly less than 10%. Do I have any proof that I'm right, no. But I certainly don't think I'm wrong either.
 
Calls make up a small percent of what typical iPhone users do while using their phone.

IT'S A PHONE! I don't give a **** what else you can do with it, IT'S A PHONE! Check this out: iPhone. It's in the name!

But look at the iPhone, so many people have it. If that many people have the iPhone, it's not a bad device.

Look at some of the flaming idiots lots of people vote for in elections. Look at some of the garbage lots of people buy. Walmart is one of the largest stores in the US and they sell almost nothing but cheap, near worthless trash. Numbers mean it's popular, period. They say nothing about quality. Millions of people can be wrong and I can point to eight years of recent US history that prove it.

That having been said, the iPhone isn't awful, it's certainly not the worst phone I've ever owned, but it's probably the worst phone I own right now. Compared to my Fuze, Blackberry 8800 and Android phone, the radio has pretty bad reception and audio is flat and far too quiet. It might be a good device but as a phone it blows and if I just a portable network device, I'd have put a sim card in my netbook's 3G card.
 
swiss_army_knife1.jpg


Sure it has scissors, a nail file, a saw and a pair of pliers. None of which are as good as the real thing.

But not all of that fits in one pocket.
 
I have better call quality, battery life, and signal with my iPhone than with any previous phone I've had, be it Nokia, Motorola, LG or Samsung. For me it works great as a phone. I think the author of this diatribe is confuses "not the right phone for me" for "worlds worst phone." They are not the same thing.

IT'S A PHONE! I don't give a **** what else you can do with it, IT'S A PHONE! Check this out: iPhone. It's in the name!

If all you want is a phone, then you purchased the wrong device.
 
swiss_army_knife1.jpg


Sure it has scissors, a nail file, a saw and a pair of pliers. None of which are as good as the real thing.

But not all of that fits in one pocket.

Are you excusing the iPhone because it has a lot of stuff?

Quality, not quantity.
 
IT'S A PHONE! I don't give a **** what else you can do with it, IT'S A PHONE! Check this out: iPhone. It's in the name!



Look at some of the flaming idiots lots of people vote for in elections. Look at some of the garbage lots of people buy. Walmart is one of the largest stores in the US and they sell almost nothing but cheap, near worthless trash. Numbers mean it's popular, period. They say nothing about quality. Millions of people can be wrong and I can point to eight years of recent US history that prove it.

That having been said, the iPhone isn't awful, it's certainly not the worst phone I've ever owned, but it's probably the worst phone I own right now. Compared to my Fuze, Blackberry 8800 and Android phone, the radio has pretty bad reception and audio is flat and far too quiet. It might be a good device but as a phone it blows and if I just a portable network device, I'd have put a sim card in my netbook's 3G card.

I'm not a Walmart fan, but Target, Koals and Walmart sell Wrangler Jeans, I get it where I get them the cheapest. Walmart sells the same "cheap, near worthless trash" as Target and any other place. They both sell Wrangler jeans, Rubbermaid stuff, Nike shoes, and the list goes on. So again how does Walmart sell "cheap, near worthless trash" when they sell the same stuff as Target and Kmart?
 
I'm not a Walmart fan, but Target, Koals and Walmart sell Wrangler Jeans, I get it where I get them the cheapest. Walmart sells the same "cheap, near worthless trash" as Target and any other place. They both sell Wrangler jeans, Rubbermaid stuff, Nike shoes, and the list goes on. So again how does Walmart sell "cheap, near worthless trash" when they sell the same stuff as Target and Kmart?

Because they all sell the same worthless crap, the difference is in the name on the door. All of the products you mentioned where never intended to last.
 
Because they all sell the same worthless crap, the difference is in the name on the door. All of the products you mentioned where never intended to last.

Nothing lasts. I buy work pants, and use them to climb polls, go in manholes, crawl around in them. How do you expect them to last? You really expect a $100.00 jeans from abercrombie will last through that? Now the Rubbermaid box I have in my house have lasted over 20 yrs so I guess some things were made to last.
 
I'm not a Walmart fan, but Target, Koals and Walmart sell Wrangler Jeans, I get it where I get them the cheapest. Walmart sells the same "cheap, near worthless trash" as Target and any other place. They both sell Wrangler jeans, Rubbermaid stuff, Nike shoes, and the list goes on. So again how does Walmart sell "cheap, near worthless trash" when they sell the same stuff as Target and Kmart?

Uh....are you really going to argue about a generalized example used to demonstrate a larger picture? I'm not, I made my point. Choose your battles a little better.
 
Are you excusing the iPhone because it has a lot of stuff?

Quality, not quantity.

Yes, I am.

Is it the best iPod? No. Is the Google Maps app the best GPS you can buy? No. Mobile Safari? The phone?

Nope, none of those thing are the best available on the market. But to have the best of all of those things, I'd need a wheelbarrow instead of a single pocket (and a couple thousand dollars more to spend).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.