..who are you to think you know everything there is about her? To criticize the media for publicizing her life while at the same time saying that the media makes her look bad... where do you get the grounds that she's not that bad? From the media as well?
Your post seems to just try to contradict everything I have written in mine. Before making a reply like that again, please read my other posts - where I clearly say a few times 'Britney has problems. Britney has done things wrong'. And like I have also said, this post is not about that. This post is about her self destruction in front of the world, and people carrying on making her feel and look worse and worse. No one knows fact from fiction, but if the life of Britney Spears' children was so bad, they would have been taken from her long, long before this.
It's Hollywood - its hard to seperate fact from fiction. The papers aren't going to sell copies showing what a brilliant mother she is, thats more OK or HELLO!'s style. The papers want to tarnish her, dish the 'dirt'. Never once have I seen them print anything positive about her, or even well wishing her.
All I am saying is stop, and listen to where your getting all your information from. Papers, who have slagged who off in the past? Everyone. And how many times have papers printed something one week, to completely reverse their allegations the next? Not only is it Hollywood, but its the media - and mixing the 2, when they often go hand in hand, can have disasterious effects.
Britney has been very, very bad - thats well document from photographs of her out partying. Now its not the partying thats bad, its when she does it (ie: after court hearings). But we don't know whats going on behind closed doors.
Take this an example of what I'm saying. A lot of Britney's ex-staff are writing stories on her, and jumping onto K-Fed's side of the fence. Fair enough, they're doing their part ''because she's causing the children harm". But, when they were on Ms. Spears' payroll and earning God knows how much, where was their concern for the children? Where was their disgust, which is ''turning them to exploit all the lies"? They've suddenly developed good-will characteristics.
Anyway, back to my example. Priness Diana was loved by all. Now, before any of you get on your high horse saying "Don't compare her to Britney - close your mouths, and read my post properly. After her death, her closest aide, Paul Burrel, did the dirty on her, and sold a lot of secrets on her, did TV interviews, wrote books - the whole 9 yards. She was an angel - and nothing like Britney Spears, yet in the name of money and personal gain, even her staff turned their backs on her.
Now, think of it in Britneys case, except, add Hollywood, an already deep interest by the tabloids. It's too easy. It wouldn't surprise me if every account written by her staff in the media was a load of bull****.
Actions show louder than words, Britney isn't getting special court treatment for the kids, they're treating her just as if they'd treat any normal citizen in this type of situation.
Yes, as they should. However, the media aren't.
She is not getting the chance to respond, she's conflicting with herself over what to do, people are leaving her and turning their backs on her in the name of money left, right and centre. Her Husband, who she idolised against the whole worlds' wishes bled her dry and left her, even her own Mother who apparently dispised Kevin has now moved over to his camp. She's completely and utterly broken, in every sense of the word. She's probably on anti-depressents and God only knows what else.
She needs to left alone, no media, nothing. They should see just what its doing to her and her children. She needs a circle of strong, supportive people around her to get better - however long it takes. Writing things that are hear say will only make her go round in circles. The dogs who feed off her name aren't stopping, so why should she bother? No ones noticed that she's trying to improve.
Just because other people have got over things, myself included, we aren't all the same. The point someone made about people who have nothing getting over things is quite possibly the most ridiculous, idiotic thing I have heard in my life. Because she has assistants, money and a nice life.. it should make it easier? Your really have a lot to learn about 'people'.
That might be true, but the direction her career took in its later stages was under her complete control. She started off as a goody-two-shoes singer, and she exploited herself.
Not really. Record companies have a lot of control over their artists. While Britney's has nothing at all over her now - they did. Remember the time when it was ''Her naughty school image has gone - look at her NOW!". Britney Spears', like others, such as Christina Aguilera, had their Teenage Rebellion in front of the camera - at the support of the record companies and tabloids. Why? It made them all money.
As for the last few years where has simply been 'out of the spotlight' (or at least tried). She has had a very troubles personal life. She seems like a very needy person. She chose Kevin Federline to fill that need. And look at what he did. A divorce or bad relationship is bad normally - imagine having your dirty laundry flaunted every day, across billboards, magazines, papers, TV and the internet. I would hate to think how I would cope. I don't think I would.
Perhaps her name doesn't need to be dragged down further, but she also doesn't help matters by continuing her activities in the public spotlight. It's not even a matter of us judging solely on what is published in the rags about her, it's about what she does so publicly.
There is no perhaps about it. It doesn't. End of story.
Continuing her activities in public? So, because of who she is, she's not allowed out to party, because it will wreck the pedestal image we are meant to hold of her? She has gone out at all the wrong times, and last year especially, all the wrong people. But people should have the common sense to see that she's literally breaking down - there is nothing left. She's going crazy.
You don't know anyone who's gone out and got wasted? Drowned their sorrows? She can't go anywhere non public and do this, other than her own home. And if she does that, her Staff are going to write things about her. At least if she goes out and does it, she can't be classed as directly hurting her children. They at least have someone looking after them.
I agree that she shouldn't get into the states she does, or at least as often, in public. But shes young, and lost. I can see it from what I would imagine is her point of view.
She can't go out without being classed as trying to 'createa public display' or exhibit herself - as the press are always after her. They literally chase people. It's their jobs and they do not care - they hunt people down.