I bet that 99% of the mac users will not notice a change in the cpu.
Big changes are given by RAM, GPU, and hard disk speed.
Even Bus speed has minor impact.
I obviously assume that a normal user plays with office, ilife and iwork.
If your life is ripping and encoding DVDs 24/7 then don't buy a mac.
Average people will enjoy their user experience even with the crippled down hardware of the MBA.
PS:
I really hope that the next MB and MBP will match the MBA form factor.
Andrea
I am about to buy 2 x 23 inch cinema displays - any news out there on updates?
Cool article. Am I the only one who thinks Apple will skip the Penryn and Santa Rosa combo and will wait until June to update it to Montevina?
First of all, buying Macs since 1983 is... well. Impossible.I've being waiting a long time for a new Mac (read Imac with better video card), almost bought a alu Imac
but kept reading that the 20inch lcd was subpar even compared to the previous version.
Don't get me wrong, I've been using and buying Macs since 1983 and I know this is heresy
but how come we see quad-core core2 processors in pc's with powerfull graphics cards (for a ridiculous price) and can't get something similar for
Macs? example:
http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/pr...3&atab=&spviewed=&newlang=EN&logon=&langid=FR
I'd be willing to pay extra for such a machine just to have Mac software onboard.
As stated above, I just got a new MacBook less than 6 months ago, so I'll be waiting at least until the first, if not the second, (to avoid first gen problems), generation of Nehalem powered MacBooks. So it looks like either MacWorld '09 or WWDC '09 is when I'll be upgrading. If these processors even come close to living up to the hype - it will be close to the speed jump between a G4 iBook and a MacBook C2D.
Seriously... a buyers guide... from MacRumors...
Taking product & purchase advice from this site is the absolute last thing any current or potential Mac user should do.
My opinion (not worth much)... just read MacRumors for entertainment.
In short: if you did wait, it'd be for nothing. You could have already been using it.
"Oooh! So, excited... Can't wait for new Macbook Pro updates!"
"What, why did the iMac get an update, they suck."
"Where's my freakin' MBP update!? Come on Apple get with it!"
... 3 months later.
"Apple! Where is my Update, I have been waiting to buy!"
"Can't wait any longer!! I heard they'll include space based brain lasers."
... finally, the update arrives.
"Pathetic update, not worth upgrading."
"What was Apple thinking, might as well have updated the Mini."
"I can buy a Dell for less."
If you need something faster, but only have a gig RAM in your MB, then upgrade that ram ASAP. 1 GB is not enough for heavy users of Leopard. I put 4GB in my MB, and the difference is like night and day.
I was shocked at how slow my brand new MB was, but with 4GB, it absolutely flies. It's like getting a whole new machine all over again. Now I'm happy with it and have no intention of upgrading for a long time (apart from needing a bigger HD).
4GB is only about $70 or so. If you have an early MB that can't take 4GB, even 2GB will make a huge difference, and is even cheaper.
Replacing RAM in your Macbook is a trivial 10 minute job, and does *not* violate your warranty! So why not do it? RAM is absurdly cheap right now, too (as long as you don't buy it from Apple ;-) .)
That is logical. Instead of spending <$100 to max out your RAM - you are blaming the laptop and planning on spending >$2000 to get a slight improvement.
The specs and performance difference between the MacBook and the MBP are minimal at best. The only real improvement comes from the graphics card - not the processor or RAM. And the newer MacBooks even have improved graphics - sure it's shared memory still - but it's 144 MB instead of 64 MB.
I've been grateful for the MR Buyer's Guide for several years. It's what helped me strategically plan for the jump from my old 1998 Beige G3 to my new 2008 Mac Pro (8-core). I figured I was caught up in the "keep waiting" routine long enough.
I know better technology is coming out next year, but I can't keep putting off my immediate plans for something continuously down the line. Besides, I do plan on replacing my 12" Powerbook G4 in 2010, hoping the Nehalem chips will make its way into MacBook Pros by then.
As for the iMacs, if you're at consumer level then any speed gains for the next generation of chips could be negligible for what applications you plan on using. If you fall into this category, then just get the next rev of the iMac. Day 1, of course.
Maybe a 2.4 will run everything you need VERY well long after Nehalem is introduced?
That is logical. Instead of spending <$100 to max out your RAM - you are blaming the laptop and planning on spending >$2000 to get a slight improvement.
That would create even more problems.
Imagine if Apple discounted the iMac a dollar a day (or $10 a week, or whatever currency in your country) due to the aging technology inside, and when the iMac is updated the price goes back to full retail.
When would everyone buy an iMac? It would be a crazy game of trying to buy an iMac right before the update to get the best discount. So if the iMac is updated once a year, then Apple is going to permanently lower the price point of the iMac buy $360 or so. That is a losing situation for Apple as it would be giving away the margin gravy that they currently make.
This probably would not be the case for upgrades like the current Core to Nehalem upgrade, but these kinds of updates don't happen near as frequently as minor updates and speed bumps.
Sounds to me like evryone here is on the same page. I'm using a G4 powerbook from '03 and over the last year or so I swapped out my harddrive for a 160GB, went from 512mb to 2gb of memory, and picked up a lacie 500gb external for time machine. All in all I spent like $400 for all that gear and the result is a 03' G4 that goes toe to toe with all my friends PC laptops that they bought within a year. I stuck out over $2400 for my G4 and even when the format jumped to the intel platform I was still pleased with the superior product I bought. So I'm up to $3000 now and I'm running the newest operating system (which I know will not be updated for quite some time) and my mac still runs all the complex music applications I need right now.....That's why I spent $3000 on a laptop. 5 years ago, my PC friends were like "$2400?, you are insane" but mac gives an incredible value for the high price.
Waiting for nehalem is the kind of decision that will give you another great 5 year laptop that will probably survive the demands that sofware writers are forcing us to upgrade to for years to come. If you buy a new Mac every time they release some minor change then you don't care about any of the advice the author of the article shared-go buy a new mac now and then get another one next year.
But if you are one of us who like to squeeze every single thing you can out of $3000 then a solid and somewhat emotional "thank you" is the response to the author of this article. You felt our anxiety over this lack-luster "update" to the MBP and you gave us GREAT advice.
P.S. I am giving my old G4 powerbook to my wife and she is beside herself with joy to be getting such an awesome machine, because even the oldies are still goodies when it comes to MAC.
People buy PCs all the time and this is essentially what they do. The difference is that PC makers actually tell people about upcoming products. The way Apple releases their products is one thing that really bugs me. Makes it impossible to plan for (which is pretty much required in an enterprise setting).
WOW!!!a 1998 computer that is still running!!!!!!! Dude that is 10 years!!!
Can't say the same for the PC world. very few PC's that old are still functioning- or if they are, you just do not want to use them anymore.
Not really, it more depends on your own particular business. As was said before, the improvements from the current model to the new one is always small, and if a business needs the tools to do the job then why would they be waiting to get new machines.
Most enterprise markets don't sit on the fence waiting to get new machines when they can just buy one and get back to work.
I said it once before, and I will say it again. APPLE does not care about it consumers. Anyone who buys a device that is 8 months old, and pays top dollar for it is a fool. And thanks to these fools, Apple will continue this practice because the bottom line is they are making money on an outdated machine.
All the loyal mac users can argue this point all they want. The facts are the facts. Apple is the only company that I know that does this. They dont even give you the option of customizing the IMAC ...
As far as I am concerned, I am done being treated like a sheep. Apple and Steve can go **** themselves.
Hahahaha...you certainly seem to be loyal customer that they're losing, Mr. PCNot. Apple has its business model and if it works for them I hardly fault them for it. Whoever said that every company had to follow the exact same paradigm? We already see what that's left us with - lots of different companies, all producing the exact same things without innovation and just sticking their brand logo on it so people will buy it. What kind of future for the market is that? Just because one company doesn stuff differently than others doesn't automatically make them wrong.
so is MacRumors stating that the iMac will not see penryn updates until June? if so, why would Apple wait so long after the MacBooks to update to the same chip?