Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not everybody wants to spend $600 or more for a second- or first-gen Intel at least, and not everybody likes PC's either, so that covers a good amount of people. A lot of people like them better, in fact. Apple's a different company than they were before, and it's shown in their products. If you look at the specs, they're enough for most things, especially now that Flash is dying.
I agree really. Thinking non buying an iMac G5 for 195 pounds. It's a lot of money for what it is though.

Overall good condition
Minor screen marks from general use

Specification:

Apple 17" G5 iMac
G5 PowerPC 1.8 GHz Processor
17" Screen (1440x900)
1GB DDR Ram
80Gb Hard Drive
Airport
Geforce FX 5200 Ultra 64mb
Combo Drive
Loaded with OS X 10.5 Leopard
Will not run snow leopard 10.6 or Lion 10.7
90 Days RTB Warranty

What's in the box:

Apple iMac
Power Cable
Restore Disks
iLife 08

Thoughts?
 
I recently bought my first ever PowerPC mac. It was a 1ghz iBook G4 for £40. The guy I bought it off couldn't get it to power up and I fancied a little project to see if I could revive it. After about 3 days, an extra £20 spent on replacement parts and a fresh install of Leopard I managed to get it running perfectly!

I'm amazed at how it can still hold its own at most household computer tasks! It far surpassed anything I expected it to do from an 8 year old computer. The only thing that isn't up to modern everyday standards really is youtube, but after reading up I can see why and so am not that bothered.

It made a nice present for my mom anyway when I finished fixing it. She has had no computer for a few months and as a family we are struggling a little too much financially recently to splash out for a new one. Shes been very happy since :)
 
I agree really. Thinking non buying an iMac G5 for 195 pounds. It's a lot of money for what it is though.

Overall good condition
Minor screen marks from general use

Specification:

Apple 17" G5 iMac
G5 PowerPC 1.8 GHz Processor
17" Screen (1440x900)
1GB DDR Ram
80Gb Hard Drive
Airport
Geforce FX 5200 Ultra 64mb
Combo Drive
Loaded with OS X 10.5 Leopard
Will not run snow leopard 10.6 or Lion 10.7
90 Days RTB Warranty

What's in the box:

Apple iMac
Power Cable
Restore Disks
iLife 08

Thoughts?

I wouldn't buy a G5 iMac at any price but they are beautiful!
 
I wouldn't buy a G5 iMac at any price but they are beautiful!

If you wanted a G5 iMac mainly for its looks and want it to be a bit more future proof then surely for a bit more money an early white intel imac would be better? Of course, it wouldn't have the big G5 logo on it.

As for buying a powerpc imac solely on looks, I think my only choice would have to be a G4 iMac. Still, in my opinion, one of apples greatest and most beautiful pieces of design they have produced.
 
As for buying a powerpc imac solely on looks, I think my only choice would have to be a G4 iMac. Still, in my opinion, one of apples greatest and most beautiful pieces of design they have produced.

I totally agree there still useable and I brought one.

I have nothing against the iMac G5 its just the capacitor issues that stop me from buying one, its not difficult to repair, its just a headache.
 
Not everybody wants to spend $600 or more for a second- or first-gen Intel at least, and not everybody likes PC's either, so that covers a good amount of people. A lot of people like them better, in fact. Apple's a different company than they were before, and it's shown in their products. If you look at the specs, they're enough for most things, especially now that Flash is dying.

Great post! You took the words right out of my mouth (This isn't supposed to be sarcastic so I apologise if it sounds that way).

----------

I totally agree there still useable and I brought one.

I have nothing against the iMac G5 its just the capacitor issues that stop me from buying one, its not difficult to repair, its just a headache.

Same here.
 
I doubt flash is dying in the next 5 years at least. 12 or 18 months ago it looked like hmtl5 was quickly on the march, but a side from youtube and vimeo I can`t see much evidence of it. All (!!) the new major net TV players are adobe flash. There were attempts at making html5 players but they were all set aside for for various reasons. I`m not sure why, but they have trouble with streaming copyright material with approved coding and actually making it work. For powerpc Flash will be an issue for ever it seems. If only there were ways around adobe flash for these type of sites.
 
Adobe is not going to support Flash in Jelly Bean, it's not supported in iOS, it's not supported in Linux except through Chrome...Flash is on it's way out..
 
I hate that textbook distributers think they need to distribute textbooks via flash. They seem to think it can't be copied or pirated, but they are as usual wrong. Flash is crap and needs to die a swift death. We should kill Microsoft C# as well... another POS.
 
I hate that textbook distributers think they need to distribute textbooks via flash. They seem to think it can't be copied or pirated, but they are as usual wrong. Flash is crap and needs to die a swift death. We should kill Microsoft C# as well... another POS.

And worse yet, you need the latest version of Flash just to update AIM and ICQ profile pictures online...
 
True! But there is a difference between buyin what you want with your money AND showing others what to do. Hes the one saying he needed a Mac Pro to do his work, which I don't believe at all. And now he says how people should totally avoid PPC macs. To me this sounds totally biased. Of course I must be biased towards PPC, but that guy isn't fair.

This guy isn't even aware of Tenfourfox. That guys knows nothing on what to use in 2012 for modern PPC experience. You can't use outdated or not optimized PPC softs and compare them to the latest Intel softs. It's like comparing apples and oranges.

If someone is gonna make a fair video on Intel VS PPC, he/she should at least compare a modern PPC (with the right software) to an Intel, and then tell what you can't do on a PPC. It is obvious that PPC has several disadvantages, no one should deny this. But at least make a fair comparison. I still believe that on a budget, a good G4 tower is the best computer money can buy. It's almost free, built like a tank, and can be used as a main machine for the average user.

I agree that your bias is showing. I love my iBook, and I'm also very well aware of its limitations. But he's not addressing me or other veteran Mac users.

Given that his target audience is PC people interested in switching to Mac, I think he presented a well informed and balanced perspective. I think it will also prove helpful to people with the concerns he addresses.

For people who mainly check their email, visit Facebook and do minimal text and/or photo editing, the PowerPC is fine. But if you're a power user who needs current software to keep up with changing standards in your field, the PPC is not for you. I don't think he was ambiguous or unfair about this at all.

I don't know that there exist equivalent forums for PC users as there are for those of us who use Macs. Buying a PPC Mac means you'll likely need to make hardware and software adjustments along the way in order to stay happy. Given that several PPC models also have long-known hardware issues, someone jumping into the Mac fray may become quickly frustrated with the limitations and known issues for their purchase.

My first computer was an Amiga 1000. My first Mac was a PowerBook 500C. I started working on my PowerBooks very early, and have continued to do minor repairs and such things as adding RAM and upgrading my hard drives all along. Not everyone who wants to switch from PCs to Macs is either willing or feels competent to do this.

As an example, I put in a larger hard drive, added RAM, Disabled AirPort Extreme (due to known kernel panics for my iBook) and replaced it with a WiFi dongle, and just today, replaced the DC-In Board (another known problem for my iBook). If I didn't enjoy doing these things, knowing that they'd improve my experience of using my PPC (or that they'd simply allow me to use it at all), I wouldn't have made the effort. I imagine that my experience doesn't describe the vast majority of PC users. I also saved hundreds of dollars by doing what I'm able to do.

The kid seems passionate about what he does. At seventeen, he's doing a lot more than a lot of other kids his age -- and older. Maybe he doesn't need all that power, but it's his money, and I'm happy to see he's able to enjoy what he does.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.