not worth it. $100 too much. Maybe if it had a 10GB ethernet port. but it does not.
also slower SD card transfer rates.
also slower SD card transfer rates.
This 100%. Satechi one is awesome and $100+ cheaper from BeatBuy.As an alternative, I love my Satechi Thunderbolt 4 dock. Got it $50 off from Best Buy late last year for $250. Does everything I need— 3x USB A, 3x TB4 plus more. And sleek, too.
It isn't a well designed product if HDDs or any disk still receives a signal and power once the host is off and disconnected. This isn't restricted to USB A either, it does this over the additional Thunderbolt port and 3.1 Gen2.And I on the contrary will only ever buy CalDigit docks in the future, I've never been as happy with a dock as I've been with my CalDigit TS3+. But I don't connect harddrives over USB, I use AirPods for audio, and I don't keep my dock in my lap so it doesn't matter if it gets a little hot. Actually I expect it to get a little hot, it's doing a lot.
That’s why I said “switch”. Peripherals are switched as a set between machines.i'm all for making things easier, but how would this work though? imagine you connect a keyboard, should it work on both devices at the same time?
Um, this is Thunderbolt, as in Thunderbolt 4.Nothing we can do about it. The world is moving away from good old VGA to HDMI and Thunderbolt.
Only mentioned it since someone joked about it lacking a Firewire and Mini-DP port and how those are surely of no use anymore ....
I'd really like a dock like this new Caldigit for my new Macbook Pro 16 M1 Max notebook. (I bought it mainly for things like FCP X video editing work and to just have an all-around great performing laptop with lots of battery life.)
But for now, hanging onto my first-edition iMac Pro running OS X Mojave and a Win 7 VM under VirtualBox..... Music gear has a longer useful "shelf life" than computer makers seem to believe it does or should.
Those are the ones we’re likely to get. This is just nice for the extra ports but we don’t really want the extra clutter of needing to strap the 10G box into the mix as well. I know we COULD it just would have been nice to not need to.Simply get the 10GbE as a separate dongle. I know of only one TB3 dock that currently includes 10GbE out of the box and that’s the OWC Thunderbolt Pro Dock.
CalDigit today introduced its new Thunderbolt Station 4 dock with 18 ports, which it claims is the most on any Thunderbolt dock ever.
Tbh I'm surprised you'd buy monitors that only have HDMI. In my experience it comes with headaches (**** color formats for a monitor most of the time) so I could on the contrary complain that there is only one DisplayPort.The most ports on any Thunderbolt dock ever, maybe… but still no HDMI. Can someone explain to me why the makers of these things seem to have such an aversion to it? It seems silly that I can pay so much money for one of these things but still have to use a dongle to connect any monitor I own to it. Is it a licensing issue?
I would argue that it's a badly designed HDD enclosure if it's spinning up drives based on USB power rather than detection of a USB-host device and interaction with an OS driver, but I don't have any examples to give you of enclosures functioning differently, on account of me not using USB-enclosures (I'm a programmer, I rarely need disk IO so fast it can't be done over TCP/IP).It isn't a well designed product if HDDs or any disk still receives a signal and power once the host is off and disconnected. This isn't restricted to USB A either, it does this over the additional Thunderbolt port and 3.1 Gen2.
IMO, it isn't doing a lot of good if it is isn't working properly.
The audio of any Thunderbolt dock is going to be provided by a USB adapter internally. Therefore, find a USB audio device that has the features you want and connect it the the Thunderbolt dock externally.Hmmm so we lose the digital optical out? Is there an alternative way of getting hi res audio out of an M1 MacBook Pro and into a seperate DAC?
CalDigit today introduced its new Thunderbolt Station 4 dock with 18 ports, which it claims is the most on any Thunderbolt dock ever.
![]()
The dock features three Thunderbolt 4 ports, with one of them providing up to 98W of pass-through charging to compatible Macs, including the latest 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro. The dock is also equipped with three USB-C ports (3.2 Gen 2), five USB-A ports (3.2 Gen 2), SD and microSD card slots (UHS-II), one DisplayPort 1.4 port, one 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet port, an audio in jack, an audio out jack, and a combo audio in/out jack.
The dock is also compatible with Macs and iPads featuring Thunderbolt 3 or USB-C ports, with some functionality limited depending on the device.
While the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro brought back many ports, the dock can expand connectivity even further and serve as a hub for connecting external displays, microphones, headphones, speakers, and other equipment.
Priced at $359.95 in the United States, £324.99 in the United Kingdom, and €324.99 in the EU, the dock can be ordered through CalDigit's online store in those regions starting today. CalDigit said the dock will launch in other regions in mid-March.
Article Link: CalDigit's New Thunderbolt 4 Dock for MacBook Pro Features 18 Ports
I’ve had constant problems with my TS3+ as well. Video glitches and then all hard drives disconnect. I no longer attach any usb hard drives to it and instead use a Dell 3100 dock for that. Caldigit support offers unuseful suggestions like try it with a different Mac or use an intel Mac. Also they now say I can’t use a usb hub with it. Maybe it’s Apple that is at fault but at this point I wish I had just bought a separate more basic TB hub like OWC’s, a Displayport adapter for my second monitor and then add what I need in terms of cheap usb hubs and card readers, etc.Personally, while I think this dock has most everything you could want, I’m extremely hesistant to buy it, b/c the TS3+ has constant issues w/ my 16” M1 Max. It randomly drops the video feed from my two monitors, and the picture will occasionally flicker badly. It could be the MBP or the Dell Monitors, but I’m almost positive it’s the dock, because if I hook the MBP directly to the monitors, there is no problem.
Caldigit support acts like this is some kind of anomaly and offers to replace my TS3+, but I’ve seen countless other posts complain about the same thing. I’ve also tried Satechi, and had refresh rate issues with that TB4 dock, but it was definitely stable, with no flickering or picture drops.
I just want a one cable setup that allows me to dock my MBP without any issues. Why is that so hard to accomplish??? I think I’ll wait until the external monitors from Apple are released, hopefully this year, and then I’ll bypass the dock all together, if possible, and, again, if possible, daisy chain the monitors, so I have a one cable solution.
Pretty sure that's called a funny.Who the eff needs FireWire and miniDP in 2022?! ?
I've never had a problem, running one 4-in, 4-out audio interface alongside another 4-in, 8-out - but I make sure that each latency-critical audio device is connected to the "top level" USB ports on the computer, and the aforementioned 7+3-port USB hub mops up the mice, keyboards, backup drives, scanners, phones/tablets, MIDI devices etc.but I was really more worried about the way USB devices tend to be connected in a series, so that 480Mbps speed gets divvied up among all the things plugged in. I've seen recording rigs on Windows where rolling the mouse around a lot while it was working with multiple audio tracks could create little pops or blips in the sound (USB wired or wireless mouse with USB transmitter dongle).
It's not. I own 2 TS3+ docks that I use every day. These things are the epitome of rock solid and fully dependable. They just work. Wake up instantly, fully reliable. I have an Elgato as well which is a total disaster in comparison (almost never connects on wake up, have to unplug and replug almost every single time with that one.)how niche is this market?
The most ports on any Thunderbolt dock ever, maybe… but still no HDMI. Can someone explain to me why the makers of these things seem to have such an aversion to it? It seems silly that I can pay so much money for one of these things but still have to use a dongle to connect any monitor I own to it. Is it a licensing issue?
You get one more power brick, and consolidate everything with one TB cable.$20 per port is marginally cheaper than individual adapters, or more depending on brand
For comparison I have a Dell WD15 USB-C dock hooked up to my Mini as well. It has a multitude of ports like the TS3+ but just without Thunderbolt. Disks do what they are supposed to and stop spinning after my Mini is powered down.I would argue that it's a badly designed HDD enclosure if it's spinning up drives based on USB power rather than detection of a USB-host device and interaction with an OS driver, but I don't have any examples to give you of enclosures functioning differently, on account of me not using USB-enclosures (I'm a programmer, I rarely need disk IO so fast it can't be done over TCP/IP).
I concede that it would be a great additional feature to be able to control how each USB port behaves individually with respect to power status while no host-device is connected. It's great to be able to plug my mouse into my dock and have it keep charging while I'm at a meeting, but it's not worth it if it breaks the USB-spec and ruins hard drives functioning correctly.
It's just I'm not sure you're right here, it seems like a poor design choice for a USB HDD enclosure to decide when the drive is spinning based solely on being supplied power or not, but I haven't read the USB spec or implemented any USB products, so I don't know how this is supposed to be done, I'm just making educated guesses based on how I would want to implement those aspects of such a device, with no knowledge whether or not that's possible in the USB spec (I should think it is, but that it requires a more complex USB device).