Coming from the days when phone camera photos were mostly pixelated blobs, all of these look fine to me. 😁
It’s a shame there aren’t any 100% crops to show the differences in detail.
I’m on a well calibrated screen at the moment, and those SE photos definitely have the best looking color. I’m glad Apple didn’t go with the cooler blueish cast of the iPhone 11 Pro.
The iPhone 8 and SE photos make me want to vomit
Nearly every DLSR owner also has a phone. When you don't have the DSLR on you when there's an opportunity, you're gonna use the phone, says every pro photographer I know."The iPhone SE is a passable camera of course that's going to take great every day shots, but those seriously interested in better iPhone photography..." That's quite a sentence! Those seriously interested in photography aren't going to be seriously into iPhone photography. For a phone, all 3 take great pics, but compared to DLSR's or mirrorless ILC cameras, there's no comparison, especially when the light, motion, and/or distance, gets challenging. I'm not saying anything new or non-obvious of course, just commenting on the absurdity of "..seriously interested in iPhone photography..."
Because they're bad or because they make the 11 seem not worthwhile?The iPhone 8 and SE photos make me want to vomit
😂 Yeah, I have an 11 Pro and I was impressed by the SE, especially the Portrait Mode shots. All of this press about the SE makes me really want to pick one up. Looks to be a really really good phone for the money. I’m blown away by what it offers at $400.If you have Amazon Delivery Now available, search for Dramamine or an equivalent. It appears the elite bias bug is making you sick to your stomach.
Because you paid 3x for the iPhone 11 Pro? Cause SE photos actually look identical to 11 Pro in most examples in this article.The iPhone 8 and SE photos make me want to vomit
Similar, not identical. At least to my eyes.Because you paid 3x for the iPhone 11 Pro? Cause SE photos actually look identical to 11 Pro in most examples in this article.
Maybe you need a better scanner?
Similar, not identical. At least to my eyes.
You’re alluding to the that the photos have to be good enough. Cameras are a hot turf war and manufacturers are tripping over themselves to up their camera game. The raw format of these photos can be accessed and to those interested can post process the way they want. People presumably pay money for the pro features of the 11 pro, one of which is a better camera.The thing is, the photos are all very good (Certainly good enough) and when you sit back and realise that, you then start to grasp the fact that these companies have that “hook“ in which to keep making your phone appear inferior to try and create that insatiable need for a new phone. These tiny incremental “improvements“ are ridiculous and are contributing to consumerism that has gone mad.
[automerge]1588141453[/automerge]
When you go around to
That‘s the thing though, according to your eyes...this is the insanity of it. Would you go around to a friends or relatives house and take the pictures off the wall and debate which phone camera they were taken with or perhaps whip out a magnifying glass and start to discuss the edge detail around “those trees,“ I doubt it.
99% of these photos are never seen again, sitting in memory on a phone. If they happened to be shared, it is on social media in a compressed format, where those who see them, see them via their (various aged eyes), on any old screen, with their random contrast, brightness and resolution for a few seconds.
These phone cameras, like most cameras are for capturing memories, not some forensic record of the subject. You don’t look back on a photo and say we enjoyed that day, but they were bad times and feel so embarrassed that I wasted the moment because I used an iPhone SE; I’m so sorry.
Yep. Would be interesting a detailed comparison between XR and SE.The iPhone SE is not the only iPhone to rely on software only for portrait mode. The XR does the same.
But it’s true, since most of the photos nowadays are taken with a phone, and a relevant percentage of those photos are taken with an iPhone."iphone photography" is such a hilarious sounding thing.
An ISP is hardware. There seems to be some sort of strange wording trend here in recent articles because of a few articles they published which referenced other sites which made this mistake. There is little if any software improvement specific to the SE, it's all hardware.Very impressive. I've always wondered how Apple's most recent ISP would fare with an older lens
I think this is impressive how the same lens can take better pictures thanks to the ISP
Just goes to show this is the way of the future with smart phones cameras. Only so much you can do with the physical lenses - only so many combinations of size, aperture and focal lengths that can fit in a smart phone camera
Apple and Google have the right idea by focusing on the ISP and less on the hardware side - the hardware is "pretty damn good" already
I'm impressed because in this price range, nothing but the Pixel 3a (and soon to be 4a) comes close.
I have looked and I have not found anything else.
Its not for me, but if I am recommending a phone, it makes the SE (and even the 8 depending on budget!) an attractive recommendation.
The iPhone 8 can be had for 250$ CAD all in used (but mint!) or less than 500 brand new (I have seen 450 for factory sealed models), and for some people that is much more attractive than the 670$ CAD all in of the SE up here, so depending on the budget and user needs, I feel confident in recommending both devices.