Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not gonna lie, that's the OnePlus 11 pictures looks pretty good for $699. Well, $599 since you get an $100 Amazon gift to spend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InnSuu
So true.
A Mirrorless (Full Frame, APS-C, 4/3) along with respective DSLRs will always blow phone cameras out the water. Not that the phone cameras aren't good, but dedicated cameras are better.

Do you honestly think an iPhone or Android is going to take a better picture than a $1000+ camera body with a dedicated lens?

Now that being said, a photo you get with a cellphone that you otherwise wouldn't get is a great photo.
I completely agree with the mirrorless/DSLR is better than a phone camera. You don’t even have to go into those 1000+ price categories, though. I do have DSLR in that category but my partner has one for less than half and… it’s still better overall.

The thing is: it’s better if you know what you’re doing. Which most people probably don’t because mirrorless/DSLR isn’t a “point and shoot” sort of deal.

And, as always with these things: the best camera is the one you have with you 😬
I can’t count how often I cursed myself for having left the DSLR at home - but then I might still get a passable shot on my phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lcgiv and dk001
I completely agree with the mirrorless/DSLR is better than a phone camera. You don’t even have to go into those 1000+ price categories, though. I do have DSLR in that category but my partner has one for less than half and… it’s still better overall.

The thing is: it’s better if you know what you’re doing. Which most people probably don’t because mirrorless/DSLR isn’t a “point and shoot” sort of deal.

And, as always with these things: the best camera is the one you have with you 😬
I can’t count how often I cursed myself for having left the DSLR at home - but then I might still get a passable shot on my phone.
Years back I preferred talking photos with DSLR. So I carried it everywhere I travelled. Since iPhone 12PM I don't do it. I know that certain occasions I missed my DSLR but most of the times the phone was enough. When it comes to a moment that I want to take the picture in very short time, phones do a much better job than changing settings in a DSLR. A point and shoot photo taken with smartphone flagships looks better than with a DSLR. Photos those are taken with time are much better than any smartphone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lcgiv
Apple designs their cameras to perform as close to Professional cameras as is possible with the technology available within a pocket sized multipurpose device. So accuracy is their purpose and Apps can provide the other like you said.

Maybe Apple does from a hardware technology perspective. Not from a software perspective. That is where the majority of Apple’s camera function resides. Their software has issues.
 
Isn't the OnePlus 11 like half the price of the iPhone 14 Pro? That makes this a rather strange comparison, and a little sad for the iPhone.
I thought it was an interesting comparison on the photography comparison, as they are similar spec'ed
OnePlus - 11 5G 256GB (Unlocked) - Eternal Green $799 USD

While Apple sells the iPhone 14 Pro w/256GB is $1099
iPhone 14 Pro Max w/256GB is $1199

One could say that the new camera technology is a lot more competitive and Apple doesn't have that much of a advantage if only looking at that aspect.
 
Last edited:
I see slight color casts on most of the Android pics which is a minor nitpick but it still bothers me when I see that. I'm assuming that's intentional and that the Android camera app is doing that to enhance the photos. Looks like it produces ok results, but in a couple cases, it uses a color shade that doesn't look right to me. I generally don't see any similar coloring on the iPhone photos.

EDIT: should have cited an example so people know what I'm talking about. The photo of the kid in the skeleton shirt smiling. Compare the white shelf in the background to the same on the iPhone photo. There's a slight orangey/pinkish cast there. I'm betting the Android software is picking up that it's a person photo and adds the color cast to warm it up but it muddies things to my eye. I prefer less enhancement by the camera. That kind of thing can always be done afterward.
 
I see slight color casts on most of the Android pics which is a minor nitpick but it still bothers me when I see that. I'm assuming that's intentional and that the Android camera app is doing that to enhance the photos. Looks like it produces ok results, but in a couple cases, it uses a color shade that doesn't look right to me. I generally don't see any similar coloring on the iPhone photos.

EDIT: should have cited an example so people know what I'm talking about. The photo of the kid in the skeleton shirt smiling. Compare the white shelf in the background to the same on the iPhone photo. There's a slight orangey/pinkish cast there. I'm betting the Android software is picking up that it's a person photo and adds the color cast to warm it up but it muddies things to my eye. I prefer less enhancement by the camera. That kind of thing can always be done afterward.
The review should have used some Nikon DSLR camera as a reference and then the two smartphone photo comparison would have been easier to judge how far we have improved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aston441 and dk001
It seems like the OnePlus 11 is more saturated and warmer but doesn't capture shadows nearly as well. Interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lcgiv
Years back I preferred talking photos with DSLR. So I carried it everywhere I travelled. Since iPhone 12PM I don't do it. I know that certain occasions I missed my DSLR but most of the times the phone was enough. When it comes to a moment that I want to take the picture in very short time, phones do a much better job than changing settings in a DSLR. A point and shoot photo taken with smartphone flagships looks better than with a DSLR. Photos those are taken with time are much better than any smartphone.
That last bit about point and shoot is exactly what I mean.
Say I want to take a picture of a cute cat, it's probably better to whip out the phone and use that. If I get my DSLR ready for it, I might have to take a test shot to see what settings I need etc, and by the time I'm ready the cat has run out of patience - or decided it needs to inspect the camera and walk over to me 🙄😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lcgiv and dk001
Another great reviewing video, zippy, clear voice, great tone, informative. One picky thing, you say iPhone 11 at 7.44, instead of 14.
 
Isn't the OnePlus 11 like half the price of the iPhone 14 Pro? That makes this a rather strange comparison, and a little sad for the iPhone.
I don't agree, for a couple of reasons.

First, the differences in phones aren't limited to the camera system. There are other reasons why iPhone buyers might want to choose iPhone over something else, and those differences may be worth the money to some.

Second, referring to photography specifically, once a camera is fairly advanced, you start to see diminishing returns after that. While it's common to see very large differences between mid-market cameras, a high-end camera might cost significantly more because even small differences are worth the cost to some. Here, the iPhone camera is better overall (IMO, at least), and that's worth a premium. Of course, if you disagree and are not in need of other iPhone-specific attributes, then choose the cheaper one.

We see the same thing in many other markets, for example loudspeakers. These days, you can get competent audio playback for under $300. If you want the best sound available, you're looking at $10,000+. The diminishing returns happen at the middle: Spend, say, $3000 and you're closer to the $10,000 sound than you are to the $300 sound. Above that point, the differences diminish.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.